But is any of that actually based on gender or what genitalia someone has?
A short, small-framed guy with a friendly disposition does not elicit the same reaction as a hulking bodybuilder with prison tattoos. The same is true of a similar spectrum of women.
My foster daughter’s mother is a smallish woman but there is something in her demeanor and the look in her eyes that tells me this is someone dangerous - I saw it the first time I met her before I knew anything about her.
I’d say gender identity is far less important for safety considerations than other characteristics, it just so happens that more men are intimidating and pose a greater physical threat because of their stature - not because of their gender.
It might be tricky to compare experiences; there's nature and nurture involved to some degree... but...
From my own experience, but I have been around a lot of people skilled in violence in a previous job.
I've never felt physically threatened by a woman, despite there being women who were very very capable.
Subconsciously, for some reason, I'd still feel more of a threat from a smaller man than I would from a larger woman. Some of these women were large as in muscular rather than just you know... big.
In another example; I lived in a rough area and knives were a commonly carried and utilised weapon. A man or a woman, regardless of size, can use one with terrible consequences. BUT I never looked at woman with half as much concern as I looked at men. Then again it comes to experience, the few times I was attacked it was by guys. One of the tactics used was acting friendly first and then using the weapon, so maybe that's why demeanour carries a lower importance to me.
Interestingly - what you said about your foster daughter's mother - it always puts a chill down my spine when I see that in someones eyes. That instinct will serve you well.