Yeah, this included long details going on about how the story could have been improved, all based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the premise and how it played into the twist at the end. That could be my fault, maybe I didn't communicate it well. But I think I did. A story like the kind done for April Fool's needs to sometimes have subtle implications without giving away too much. It can be a tricky balance.
There was also a factual point he was wrong about but made a whole long paragraph about. And I know that that one was very explicitly described in the story.
But that aside, it was at least constructive and not insulting. Hey, @Comentarista82, if you're lurking here, the thread has some advice you could use to make your comments more valuable. It's a conversation, not a lecture. You could be a great boon to writers if you had a better bedside manner.
Almost.
