That's one of the best explanation of him I've seen!!Sometimes I wonder if he's really one of us, and just wants to make the other side look even worse than they already do.
If so, he's doing a great job!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's one of the best explanation of him I've seen!!Sometimes I wonder if he's really one of us, and just wants to make the other side look even worse than they already do.
If so, he's doing a great job!
Because Indians were considered peoples of a different nation(s). Indian land within the US are considered independent nations by the federal government.. The relationship between Indians and the US is complicated.. Basically US federal, state, county laws do not apply on Indian lands except when agreed upon by treaty..There could be a question to this claim since her parents were foreign citizens at the time of her birth here:
I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural-born citizen; but, sir, I may be allowed to say further that I deny that the Congress of the United States ever had the power, or color of power to say that any man born within the jurisdiction of the United States, not owing a foreign allegiance, is not and shall not be a citizen of the United States. [emphasis added]
My question was/is why do they?Trumplikans will believe what ever come out of Trump’s ass. No reason to argue with shit
This shit doesn’t even have a kernel of truth on it
Did Haley back Trump’s earlier Birtherism?
It's largely because the Trump supporters are dumb as rocks and are happy believing what they want to believe.My question was/is why do they?
I understand why Trump does it, Harley is gaining on him in the poles he has nothing to lose by playing the birther card it worked in the past it may work again if it doesn't, he isn't any worst off.
What puzzles is why people buy the bullshit?
Does she back Birtherism I have no idea.. I will guess if she thinks it will get a vote she will, if it doesn't offer her an advantage in the polls she doesn't.. Probably preaches both views on the same day to different audiences. I believe I have politicians pretty well figured out what I don't have figures is their supporters.. That's what I'm trying to do..
Trump made it OK to be openly racist for the first time in two generations. They love that.What puzzles is why people buy the bullshit?
Nebraska governor stands firm on rejection of federal money to feed food-insecure children
Nebraska’s governor is standing firm on his plans to reject $18 million in federal funding to help feed children who might otherwise go hungry while school is out.
"He has drawn a firestorm of criticism for later defending that stance at a news conference by saying, “I don’t believe in welfare.”"
"Neighboring Iowa is also opting out of the program, with Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds announcing that decision last week and saying, “An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic.”"
Not OK.
Oklahoma Rejects Plan To Help Feed Hungry Kids
Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt said "certain agenda items" stopped him from approving a USDA food program for children in the summer.
.
"The letter questioned Rosenworcel's testimony at a recent House hearing in which she warned that 25 million households could lose Internet access if Congress doesn't renew the ACP discounts. The ACP was created by congressional legislation, but Republicans are wary of continuing it. The program began with $14.2 billion a little less than two years ago.
"At a hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on November 30, 2023, you asserted—without evidence and contrary to the FCC's own data—that '25 million households' would be 'unplug[ged]…from the Internet' if Congress does not provide new funding for the ACP," the letter said. "This is not true. As Congress considers the future of taxpayer broadband subsidies, we ask you to correct the hearing record and make public accurate information about the ACP.""
"Many of the current ACP recipients may have previously acquired broadband service through a predecessor discount program, so they weren't necessarily paying full price to begin with. The FCC implemented the $30 monthly ACP benefit in early 2022, replacing the previous $50 monthly subsidy from the Emergency Broadband Benefit Program that started enrolling users in May 2021. Both programs were authorized by Congress."
"The White House said in October that the ACP has proven to be especially critical for rural, remote, and tribal communities. While the standard discount is $30 a month, the program provides $75 monthly subsidies on tribal lands and in "high-cost" areas where the cost of building broadband networks is higher than average.
"Without this funding, tens of millions of people would lose this benefit and would no longer be able to afford high-speed Internet service without sacrificing other necessities," the White House said when it asked Congress for more ACP funding."
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...n-to-kill-program/?comments=1&comments-page=1
========================
This is the main 'Pub base, rural, remote and/or low income. They want to directly harm the people most likely to vote for them.
But I got a kick out of this comment:
"Rafael Edward Cruz; if he doesn't want people to use names that aren't on their birth certificate, he doesn't get courtesy for his own chosen name."