fallenupright
Geekier than thou
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
- Posts
- 3,208
RocknRoll said:yes unfortunatly it doesnt seem to be liked much in essays! lol
I the dialectic approach... and I much prefer talking to typing when it comes to disscussing allot...
here *shrugs*...
thinking point for now:
If I say that there are only white swans because I have only ever seen white swans, and then someone shows me a black swan, should I then assume that there must be some grey swans and indeed some other coloured swans out there waiting for me to see them?
Of course not. You shouldn't assume anything. You don't even know that they exist. Besides, white, black, grey or pink... it's all relative. I mean, if you are colourblind, and I am not... you might see what I see as green as purple - and who is to say who is correct, or if any of us are. The object we see might not even be the object in itself. We all are looking at the world through our own eyes, and because of that, we won't ever know what is real.
Not to mention that is the same stupid example thing they gave us for argumentation in the dreaded "Critical Thinking" class I took in first year. All swans are white. X is a swan. Therfore X is white. ... argumentitive fallacy because The first premise is not true. o.0
AHH! You made me recall argumentation! How evil of you.