I have a question - where are the Lit experts?

[Very_Bad_Man]

If a women has a sex change to become a man and after has sex with a dude does that make the transgender a homosexual now?



answer the poll

 

[Jm J Bullock]

If a women has a sex change to become a man and after has sex with a dude does that make him a homosexual?



answer the poll

Who? the dude?

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

Who? the dude?

fixed the question

 

[Saint Peter]

Was it a really tranny surprise, or did you know the truth before the junk flew out of the panties?

 

[Peregrinator]

It makes the person asking the question queer.

 

[Jm J Bullock]

Was it a really tranny surprise, or did you know the truth before the junk flew out of the panties?

In all fairness, he thought it was a sock.

 

[Saint Peter]

In all fairness, he thought it was a sock.

Other than the hair and a few pimples he thought it was just like a chick's ass.

 

[Jm J Bullock]

Other than the hair and a few pimples he thought it was just like a chick's ass.

So he's from the Ukraine.

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

If none of you know it is fine

 

[Jm J Bullock]

It makes you bi.

 

[Liar]

Multi choice poll on this?

I guess that's sort of apropos.

 

[CHNOPS]

What are you trying to tell us?

 

[ksmybuttons]

It would only matter if I was one of them and then it wouldn't matter because it would be my choice and I don't need the label. Simple... .

 

[rosco rathbone]

No faster way to get a hormone-rage fuelled handbag upside the head than calling an MTF straight transgendered person gay.

 

[Peregrinator]

It makes the person asking the question queer.

What are you trying to tell us?

.....

 

[Comshaw]

If none of you know it is fine

Jesus fucking Christ...where do you think you are???? EVERYONE on the GB is an expert and knows everything FFS!!!

Now if the party of the first part knew the party of the second part at one time had genitalia that was similar to the party of the first part and the party of the first part engaged in sex with the party of the second part while those genitalia were present, then the party of the third part can call the party of the first part a homosexual. BUT, if the party of the first part had no knowledge of the removed genitalia and had vaginal (constructed as opposed to natural vagina) sex with the party of the second part while believing the vaginal construct was natural then the part of the the third part can in no way assume or imply the party of the first part is homosexual.

Simple...

Comshaw

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

Jesus fucking Christ...where do you think you are???? EVERYONE on the GB is an expert and knows everything FFS!!!

Now if the party of the first part knew the party of the second part at one time had genitalia that was similar to the party of the first part and the party of the first part engaged in sex with the party of the second part while those genitalia were present, then the party of the third part can call the party of the first part a homosexual. BUT, if the party of the first part had no knowledge of the removed genitalia and had vaginal (constructed as opposed to natural vagina) sex with the party of the second part while believing the vaginal construct was natural then the part of the the third part can in no way assume or imply the party of the first part is homosexual.

Simple...

Comshaw

thank you for clearing this matter up

 

[Comshaw]

thank you for clearing this matter up

You're welcome. And if you need any other opinions, I will be happy to make another trip to the restroom to consult my law library.



Comshaw

 

[mark197205]

Your poll is moot, there is no Dolf option.

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

Your poll is moot, there is no Dolf option.

yeah the thing is

i just don't give a fuck about her.

 

[CHNOPS]

Your poll is moot, there is no Dolf option.

That's not what moot means, but it doesn't matter.

 

[mark197205]

That's not what moot means, but it doesn't matter.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/moot

I intepret it as points 2 and 5.

 

[KRCummings]

This is the kind of thing that only men consider.

 

[CHNOPS]

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/moot

I intepret it as points 2 and 5.

You meant it to be a verb?

 

[mark197205]

You meant it to be a verb?

No, point 5 would be the closer interpretation by me, I mentioned point 2 because it specifies making something pointless or of no value.