Feminists in England prevent women from being punished for raping men

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://i.imgur.com/etlBjRO.png
A woman cannot be punished for rape if she forces herself on a man.

Thanks, feminism!

No wonder only 7% of the populace wants to be identified with you anymore.

 

[Rachel_X]

http://i.imgur.com/etlBjRO.png
A woman cannot be punished for rape if she forces herself on a man.

Thanks, feminism!

No wonder only 7% of the populace wants to be identified with you anymore.

How exactly would the man be raped if not by forcing his penis to penetrate a woman?

 

[lovecraft68]

Meanwhile in India a young girl was raped by her father and the village elders had her whipped.

Oh, the poor poor men LJ, they suffer so.

 

[nerfhearder]

How exactly would the man be raped if not by forcing his penis to penetrate a woman?

Using a dildo or strapon is rape. Forcing a man to eat pussy would be rape.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Using a dildo or strapon is rape. Forcing a man to eat pussy would be rape.

You hush....everyone knows it's impossible for men to be raped, they are just whiny babies that need to 'man up' and stop all that whining.

Saying anything else CLEARLY = misogyny and promoting violence against women.

 

[badbabysitter]

A woman cannot be punished for rape if she forces herself on a man.

Thanks, feminism!

You cannot be this stupid, you seriously can't

Section 2 and 3 directly show that a woman can be punished if she forces herself on man

if you did the most basic of research like reading the actual fucking law you'd know that

the reason that section 1 of the Sex Offense Act of 2003 wasn't changed is that specifically deals with penetration by men to women or men.. Sections 2 and 3 directly deal assault by women, by objects and non penetrative non consensual sex acts



if you changed section 1, you would have rendered the other sections meaningless and unenforcable


words cannot describe the stupid

No wonder only 7% of the populace wants to be identified with you anymore.

now it's 7% .... that's amazing , your last study that you claimed that 82 % were opposed to feminism, ....butttttttt how actually 20 % identified as feminists with and additional 62% believed in feminist ideology and just didnt want to be identified as feminists , and those that opposed feminisim turned out to only be 8%... I'm dying to see where you got this new number

 

[badbabysitter]

You hush....everyone knows it's impossible for men to be raped, they are just whiny babies that need to 'man up' and stop all that whining.

Saying anything else CLEARLY = misogyny and promoting violence against women.

hilarious.. you fell for it too

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

You cannot be this stupid, you seriously can't

Section 2 and 3 directly show that a woman can be punished if she forces herself on man

if you did the most basic of research like reading the actual fucking law you'd know that

the reason that section 1 of the Sex Offense Act of 2003 wasn't changed is that specifically deals with penetration by men to women or men.. Sections 2 and 3 directly deal assault by women, by objects and non penetrative non consensual sex acts



if you changed section 1, you would have rendered the other sections meaningless and unenforcable


words cannot describe the stupid




now it's 7% .... that's amazing , your last study that you claimed that 82 % were opposed to feminism, ....butttttttt how actually 20 % identified as feminists with and additional 62% believed in feminist ideology and just didnt want to be identified as feminists , and those that opposed feminisim turned out to only be 8%... I'm dying to see where you got this new number

There you go again, expecting LeJerkalope to actually READ!?

98% of all statistics on the Internet are made up.

LeJackass believes all of them, as long as they back his twisted vision of reality.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You cannot be this stupid, you seriously can't

Section 2 and 3 directly show that a woman can be punished if she forces herself on man

For a lesser crime than rape. Which hardly matters since women get less time in prison than men for the same crime, anyway. And women are less likely to get convicted at all.

now it's 7% .... that's amazing , your last study that you claimed that 82 % were opposed to feminism

18% of people support feminists in America, dumbass.
Only 7% in England.

http://i.imgur.com/aBc9HLS.jpg

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

hilarious.. you fell for it too

Nah, that is how feminism works nowadays. He nailed you.

 

[badbabysitter]

My time is very limited today, so I'll make sure to point out your logic blunders as quickly and as succintly as possible

For a lesser crime than rape.

Since section 1 and 2 face identical sentencing, this is a complete falsehood... also included in the Act in later parts are child pornography, bestiality, necrophila, pedophilia, sexual trafficking, etcetera... just because they appear in different parts of a list does not make them " lesser" crimes

Which hardly matters since women get less time in prison than men for the same crime, anyway. And women are less likely to get convicted at all.

Yes and no. The most comprehensive study on this was in 2014, but was not entirely conclusive even by the authors own admission.. it did show that men did in fact serve sentences up to 63% longer then women commiting the same crime... but wasn't considered conclusive, as women were 5 times more likley to accept plea deals and 3 times more likely to enter rehabilatory programs.. and nearly 3 times less likely to be repeat offenders.. all of which are HUGE factors in sentencing

so yes, there is certainly a massive problem in gender disparity in the sentencing system.. but with the other factors in play, it's difficult by any stretch of the imagination to conclude this based solely on genitialia

18% of people support feminists in America, dumbass.

according to your study 20 % people identify as feminists, not support feminism as you claim.. in fact , according to your study 62% of people support the ideology but dont identify as feminists...stop making up numbers

Only 7% in England.

still cant read articles, can you... here's a few interesting tid bits

Eight per cent of young people aged 18-34 expressed this view compared to two per cent of people aged more than 55.

Around 61 per cent of those aged 18-34 said they were sympathetic to feminism – a figure that jumped to 72 per cent for those aged more than 55.

Sam Smethers, the charity’s chief executive, said: “The overwhelming majority of the public share our feminist values but don’t identify with the label. However the simple truth is if you want a more equal society for women and men then you are in fact a feminist.

...

so...once again, you think not wanting to label yourself as a feminist somehow magically makes you opposed to it?

in the end, here's the biggest truth from the article you linked

Smethers continued: “Feminism is enjoying a welcome resurgence now, particularly amongst young women. But if we want to secure lasting change in our society we need to bring that mainstream majority with us. As feminists, the challenge comes back to us to include those women and men who want to achieve equality but who do not readily identify with the term.”

 

[lovecraft68]

LJ should be in his glory these days because see the Government is letting men go into women's bathrooms now to ogle and harass not just women, but little girls I gues women's rights don't matter anymore.

I can just see LJ's fat gross ass and his MRA friends walking into ladies rooms saying, "I'm a transgender uh huh uh huh uh huh and trying to look over the stalls so they can say they saw an actual pussy once in their lives.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

My time is very limited today, so I'll make sure to point out your logic blunders as quickly and as succintly as possible

And then you go and split the atom of DERP in the process...

Since section 1 and 2 face identical sentencing

Uh, NO they don't. You're insane.

Yes and no. The most comprehensive study on this was in 2014, but was not entirely conclusive even by the authors own admission.. it did show that men did in fact serve sentences up to 63% longer then women commiting the same crime... but wasn't considered conclusive, as women were 5 times more likley to accept plea deals and 3 times more likely to enter rehabilatory programs.. and nearly 3 times less likely to be repeat offenders.. all of which are HUGE factors in sentencing

They also get less time in prison than men who take plea deals, women get offered rehab more often, and that same "repeat offender" argument is used to justify keeping black men locked up longer. Nice job, Jim Crow.

so yes, there is certainly a massive problem in gender disparity in the sentencing system.. but with the other factors in play, it's difficult by any stretch of the imagination to conclude this based solely on genitialia

Actually it's because feminists have been agitating to get rid of prisons for women altogether.

according to your study 20 % people identify as feminists, not support feminism as you claim.. in fact , according to your study 62% of people support the ideology but dont identify as feminists...stop making up numbers

You're the one who is making up numbers. 80% of Americans don't identify as feminists because they do not see feminism as being about equality.

Sam Smethers, the charity’s chief executive, said: “The overwhelming majority of the public share our feminist values but don’t identify with the label. However the simple truth is if you want a more equal society for women and men then you are in fact a feminist.

That's not truth, that's brute force assertion. Feminism isn't about equality and hardly anyone believes it is anymore, because feminism has repeatedly shown itself to be a fraud.

You're trying to do spin control here and all it's doing is making you dizzy.

What part of "people do not see feminism as being about equality" do you not understand?

Smethers continued: “Feminism is enjoying a welcome resurgence now, particularly amongst young women. But if we want to secure lasting change in our society we need to bring that mainstream majority with us. As feminists, the challenge comes back to us to include those women and men who want to achieve equality but who do not readily identify with the term.”

Now she's speculating. And you are trying to pass that off as truth. Guess where the women against feminism is coming from? Also young women.

Oops. You have one foot in your mouth, care to go for four?

LJ should be in his glory these days because see the Government is letting men go into women's bathrooms now to ogle and harass not just women, but little girls I gues women's rights don't matter anymore.

Oh I see, not only are you a white trash racist but you're also a raging transphobe.

I guess the reason your daughter is dating a black man is because she thinks all white men are as simple minded and cowardly as you. Pity.

 

[Sean Renaud]

LJ should be in his glory these days because see the Government is letting men go into women's bathrooms now to ogle and harass not just women, but little girls I gues women's rights don't matter anymore.

I can just see LJ's fat gross ass and his MRA friends walking into ladies rooms saying, "I'm a transgender uh huh uh huh uh huh and trying to look over the stalls so they can say they saw an actual pussy once in their lives.

The real victims of this are men. I've been inside a women's bathroom. Everybody is in a stall where you couldn't spy on someone without being incredibly obvious. But women can now walk in and just see my wang at the urinal.

Not to mention they'll find out about that thing we have in the bathrooms.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

The real victims of this are men. I've been inside a women's bathroom. Everybody is in a stall where you couldn't spy on someone without being incredibly obvious. But women can now walk in and just see my wang at the urinal.

Not to mention they'll find out about that thing we have in the bathrooms.

Hahahahaha MRAs really whupped your ass good here.

Oh wait IIRC it was OBAMA who passed down this transgendered bathroom directive, wasn't it?

So this puts you in the camp of Trump and his Conservatives who hate this directive. Well whaddo ya know. You're back to your house negro mode in full glory. Fucking transphobe.