Der Fuhrer Donald Trump will do more damage to men's rights than a fucking Matriarchy

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
Hillary Clinton would do very little to harm men's rights in a worst case scenario.

The Paycheck Fairness Act will do nothing to harm men.
The overzealousness of Title IX is already being slapped down by lawsuits by MRAs.
There really isn't much else that Clinton could do to try to hurt men.

Trump, on the other hand?
He will most likely stand by while the GOP invigorates more Hobby Lobby-style behavior in GOP-dominated states, making it harder for women (but not men) to get contraception on their health care plan.
He will certainly stand by while the GOP destroys Title IX. This will swing the pendulum all the way back around to colleges totally ignoring / burying rape accusations. What is really needed is Title IX reform, in which all rape accusations go to criminal court, and general rape prosecution reform in which all rape kits in America are processed in a timely manner. But the GOP won't do that - they'll just blow the doors open so rape cases get ignored. Which is stupid and very bad for women.

Men's rights would flourish at the activist level under Hillary. We would continue to win victories as we have been, and the feminist element in Hillary's wake would, at worst, keep the Return of Kings and other misogynist alt-right nutters in check. MRAs already hate Return of Kings and even if they wanted to, they just don't have the resources to bail out the alt-right and their misogynist nutjobbery. The alt-right has too many low/no-value hills to die on, basically. Plus a Clinton presidency will mean anti-war Democrats relentlessly beating her on the head to keep out of wars (which mainly kill men) and more workplace safety laws which will prevent more workplace deaths (which statistically save primarily men's lives). Hillary won't cause a MRA backlash; instead men's rights will simply plod forward under her shadow, largely unimpeded, but the alt-right misogynists will be shit out of luck.

Herr Trump, on the other hand
This dude's going to absolutely piss off women for no good reason and cause a major feminist backlash. The GOP running wild on his watch will do much harm to homeless men, men in hazardous places, and when Russia gets out of control, guess who's gonna have to die on foreign hills to get them back in check? You guessed it, the men. But society's sympathy well for men will absolutely dry up because of what the GOP will be doing to women's rights.

Worst case scenario: MRAs stupidly hitch their horse to Trump and his alt-right Nazi brigade. The women allies we've attracted to our movement start to drop off, and the men's rights movement rides Trump's coattails down to political ruin for the next generation.

The best thing MRAs can do is repudiate Trump as loudly and effectively as possible. When he goes east, the movement needs to flee west as fast as they can. And no matter how much they think GOP laws might benefit men, MRAs need to say NO!!! to everything Trump or the GOP wants to do. Do not drink the kool-aid, do not eat the candy. The bigger the schism between the men's rights movement and the alt-right, the better off we will be when the alt-right is driven from power by the shifting demographics.

MRAs need to embrace pragmatism: stuff like equal pay laws aren't gonna hurt us, it's not a battle worth fighting, and a misogynist administration costs us female allies, and that's a bad thing.
 
Hillary Clinton would do very little to harm men's rights in a worst case scenario.

The Paycheck Fairness Act will do nothing to harm men.
The overzealousness of Title IX is already being slapped down by lawsuits by MRAs.
There really isn't much else that Clinton could do to try to hurt men.

Trump, on the other hand?
He will most likely stand by while the GOP invigorates more Hobby Lobby-style behavior in GOP-dominated states, making it harder for women (but not men) to get contraception on their health care plan.
He will certainly stand by while the GOP destroys Title IX. This will swing the pendulum all the way back around to colleges totally ignoring / burying rape accusations. What is really needed is Title IX reform, in which all rape accusations go to criminal court, and general rape prosecution reform in which all rape kits in America are processed in a timely manner. But the GOP won't do that - they'll just blow the doors open so rape cases get ignored. Which is stupid and very bad for women.

Men's rights would flourish at the activist level under Hillary. We would continue to win victories as we have been, and the feminist element in Hillary's wake would, at worst, keep the Return of Kings and other misogynist alt-right nutters in check. MRAs already hate Return of Kings and even if they wanted to, they just don't have the resources to bail out the alt-right and their misogynist nutjobbery. The alt-right has too many low/no-value hills to die on, basically. Plus a Clinton presidency will mean anti-war Democrats relentlessly beating her on the head to keep out of wars (which mainly kill men) and more workplace safety laws which will prevent more workplace deaths (which statistically save primarily men's lives). Hillary won't cause a MRA backlash; instead men's rights will simply plod forward under her shadow, largely unimpeded, but the alt-right misogynists will be shit out of luck.

Herr Trump, on the other hand
This dude's going to absolutely piss off women for no good reason and cause a major feminist backlash. The GOP running wild on his watch will do much harm to homeless men, men in hazardous places, and when Russia gets out of control, guess who's gonna have to die on foreign hills to get them back in check? You guessed it, the men. But society's sympathy well for men will absolutely dry up because of what the GOP will be doing to women's rights.

Worst case scenario: MRAs stupidly hitch their horse to Trump and his alt-right Nazi brigade. The women allies we've attracted to our movement start to drop off, and the men's rights movement rides Trump's coattails down to political ruin for the next generation.

The best thing MRAs can do is repudiate Trump as loudly and effectively as possible. When he goes east, the movement needs to flee west as fast as they can. And no matter how much they think GOP laws might benefit men, MRAs need to say NO!!! to everything Trump or the GOP wants to do. Do not drink the kool-aid, do not eat the candy. The bigger the schism between the men's rights movement and the alt-right, the better off we will be when the alt-right is driven from power by the shifting demographics.

MRAs need to embrace pragmatism: stuff like equal pay laws aren't gonna hurt us, it's not a battle worth fighting, and a misogynist administration costs us female allies, and that's a bad thing.

I hope you vote for secession.

Ishmael
 
Hillary Clinton would do very little to harm men's rights in a worst case scenario.

Nobody but a handful of dipshits ever thought she would or even could.

Trump, on the other hand?
He will most likely stand by while the GOP invigorates more Hobby Lobby-style behavior in GOP-dominated states

Oh noes he might let republicans live like republicans, manage their own shit......what ever will CA, IL and NY do if they can't boss the rest of the country around?

Gawd forbid they mind their own bidniz, that would be a fucking tragedy!! :rolleyes:
 
There's nothing at all inherently wrong with a patriarchal or matriarchal society. The problem comes from equalism. If nobody's in charge you have conflict.

The Navajos have had a matriarchal society for centuries; men are not abused there.
 
Nobody but a handful of dipshits ever thought she would or even could.



Oh noes he might let republicans live like republicans, manage their own shit......what ever will CA, IL and NY do if they can't boss the rest of the country around?

Gawd forbid they mind their own bidniz, that would be a fucking tragedy!! :rolleyes:
http://i.imgur.com/gOpH9s2.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/3czHWrU.jpg

This right here should explain to you why:
http://i.imgur.com/wmEpNVG.jpg

64 million people voted for Hillary, dude. THE DREADFUL HILLARY. 2 million more than voted for that Orange Nazi.

BUT MUH ELECTORAL COLLEGE-

You can't hold back that magnitude of rising left-wing electoral sea levels for long with statewide gerrymandering and electoral college hijinks. Eventually you become New Orleans, eventually the sea wins.

You're one Elizabeth Warren, Michelle Obama or Bernie Sanders away from a left-wing tsunami.

The men's rights movement needs to get their heads straight, rethink their lives, and get on the right, er left side of diversity and inclusiveness. Hitching our horse to the GOP and Conservatism is a moral tragedy and it is also pragmatically stupid. The GOP is doomed, long term. Look at those numbers, they do not lie.
 
MRAs need to embrace pragmatism: stuff like equal pay laws aren't gonna hurt us, it's not a battle worth fighting, and a misogynist administration costs us female allies, and that's a bad thing.

Equal pay laws benefit losers and hurt winners. Ergo MRAs are losers.
 
http://i.imgur.com/gOpH9s2.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/3czHWrU.jpg

This right here should explain to you why:
http://i.imgur.com/wmEpNVG.jpg

64 million people voted for Hillary, dude. THE DREADFUL HILLARY. 2 million more than voted for that Orange Nazi.

BUT MUH ELECTORAL COLLEGE-

You can't hold back that magnitude of rising left-wing electoral sea levels for long with statewide gerrymandering and electoral college hijinks. Eventually you become New Orleans, eventually the sea wins.

You're one Elizabeth Warren, Michelle Obama or Bernie Sanders away from a left-wing tsunami.

The men's rights movement needs to get their heads straight, rethink their lives, and get on the right, er left side of diversity and inclusiveness. Hitching our horse to the GOP and Conservatism is a moral tragedy and it is also pragmatically stupid. The GOP is doomed, long term. Look at those numbers, they do not lie.

You are absolutely delusional. Unless you plan on busing those extra two million voters all around the country strategically winning California which was already a foregone conclusion is meaningless. You could have added another four million or ten million Californians voting it still wouldn't change the outcome at all.

Gerrymandering helps to the tune of maybe one seat one way or the other in your state legislature but at some point you have actual people having to go and vote. They did they didn't like Hillary.

let's pretend that none of the 2 million extra vote she got it California illegal aliens let's pretend they're all actual citizens if it were closer in California you have no idea what the turnout might have been amongst people who don't like Hillary. In California voting against Hillary is a waste of time
 
This right here should explain to you why:
http://i.imgur.com/wmEpNVG.jpg

You're one Elizabeth Warren, Michelle Obama or Bernie Sanders away from a left-wing tsunami.

The GOP is doomed, long term. Look at those numbers, they do not lie.

Keep telling yourself that, the left is falling apart as they continue to alienate as many demographics as possible with their identity/victim politics.

Also it's going to be a lot harder to blame all their problems on the evil white cisgender male when there aren't any left. What then? (D) will be fucked and either have to find a new boogeyman or actually make their socialist bullshit start working.

LOL

Hitching our horse to the GOP and Conservatism is a moral tragedy and it is also pragmatically stupid.

Why is conservatism a moral tragedy?

What is immoral about it?
 
Last edited:
Keep telling yourself that, the left is falling apart as they continue to alienate as many demographics as possible with their identity/victim politics.
Please show where the left is falling apart.

Also it's going to be a lot harder to blame all their problems on the evil white cisgender male when there aren't any left. What then? (D) will be fucked and either have to find a new boogeyman or actually make their socialist bullshit start working.
This is assuming their policies will fail.

Why is conservatism a moral tragedy?

What is immoral about it?
The racism, the disdain for the working class, their educational system that produced self proclaimed high speed assassins posting from their momma's basement about how self sufficient they are...
 
Equal pay laws benefit losers and hurt winners. Ergo MRAs are losers.
Dafuq? So you don't mind being paid less than a man for the same work? You been hanging out with Uncle Ruckus as of late or something?
 
Please show where the left is falling apart.

They have no power, they lost it all except for a minority of states that's so small (R)'s are within striking distance of being able to re-write the US Constitution and their big response is to double down on their racist bullshit to try and hold on.

This is assuming their policies will fail.

Haven't been successful so far.

The racism

Conservatism =/= racism....there is nothing racist about conservatism.

the disdain for the working class

Conservatism doesn't carry a disdain for the working class, it's apathetic toward the nonworking class.....big difference.

their educational system that produced self proclaimed high speed assassins posting from their momma's basement about how self sufficient they are...

Nothing to do with conservatism.

Care to try again? Or are you going to go directly to name calling?

Dafuq? So you don't mind being paid less than a man for the same work? You been hanging out with Uncle Ruckus as of late or something?

LJ's perfect demonstration of lefty low expectations bigotry.

Maybe she would prefer the right to negotiate her own pay??

Nahhh can't have that!!!

Liburhulz that hate liberty say the STATE gets to negotiate and or dictate a persons compensation.....especially for women and minorities since they aren't capable of negotiating their own terms of employment.
 
Last edited:
Dafuq? So you don't mind being paid less than a man for the same work? You been hanging out with Uncle Ruckus as of late or something?

I am paid more than the white men at my job. (I know because I am in charge of the books, among other things.) I get paid more because they aren't my equals. Why do you assume that I, a black woman, can't get what I deserve without government interference? You view me as Less Than compared to white guys. Why is that? And why do you require laws to make to change your opinion of the value and competency of women?
 
Last edited:
I am paid more than the white men at my job. (I know because I am in charge of the books, among other things.) I get paid more because they aren't my equals. Why do you assume that I, a black woman, can't get what I deserve without government interference? You view me as Less Than compared to white guys. Why is that? And why do you require laws to make to change your opinion of the value and competency of women?

Liberals are infected with the soft bigotry of low expectation when it comes to minorities...
 
I am paid more than the white men at my job. (I know because I am in charge of the books, among other things.) I get paid more because they aren't my equals. Why do you assume that I, a black woman, can't get what I deserve without government interference? You view me as Less Than compared to white guys. Why is that? And why do you require laws to make to change your opinion of the value and competency of women?
It ain't about being less than. It's about white people in charge paying black women less in most situations.

This is like saying "what, are you saying I'm less?" when talking about abolishing Jim Crow.
 
They have no power, they lost it all except for a minority of states that's so small (R)'s are within striking distance of being able to re-write the US Constitution and their big response is to double down on their racist bullshit to try and hold on.
Whites won't be the majority forever. Their monopoly won't last.

The end.
 
Whites won't be the majority forever. Their monopoly won't last.

The end.

Well we don't have a monopoly, because the evil pieces of shit known as white people don't all vote the same, just like people of color. You can't just stick them all in one political type because of skin color you bigot.

Further more they will be for the rest of our lives and likely a lot longer.

And that doesn't mean the death of conservatism either, I'm sorry you're just delusional.
 
It ain't about being less than. It's about white people in charge paying black women less in most situations.

This is like saying "what, are you saying I'm less?" when talking about abolishing Jim Crow.
So this thread is about race now? I Still make more money, how does play into this?
 
So this thread is about race now? I Still make more money, how does play into this?

race/gender division....like most lefties that's how LJ sees the world.

Men v. women.

Minorities vs. evil fuckin' white pieces of shit.
 
Nice to see your name up here again. :)

A.He will certainly stand by while the GOP destroys Title IX.

B.This will swing the pendulum all the way back around to colleges totally ignoring / burying rape accusations. What is really needed is Title IX reform, in which all rape accusations go to criminal court, and general rape prosecution reform in which all rape kits in America are processed in a timely manner. But the GOP won't do that - they'll just blow the doors open so rape cases get ignored. Which is stupid and very bad for women.
I don't get this one. What's Title 9 and what does A have to dowith B?

Der Fuhrer Donald Trump will do more damage to men's rights than a fucking Matriarchy

Trump, on the other hand?
He will most likely stand by while the GOP invigorates more Hobby Lobby-style behavior in GOP-dominated states, making it harder for women (but not men) to get contraception on their health care plan.

This dude's going to absolutely piss off women for no good reason and cause a major feminist backlash.
Yup the eternal laws of physics. See the French Revolution where those who were oppressed had enough and dethroned the despots, yet in the process they became despots themselves.

and when Russia gets out of control, guess who's gonna have to die on foreign hills to get them back in check? You guessed it, the men.

But that's the whole point of having better relations with Russia: to avoid conflict escalation into war,
possibly World War 3.

First of all NATO were upping the anti against Russia too much, in order to maintain the US coalition sphere of influence in Europe. But by doing so, they were escalating a conflict which might have ended in war.

Secondly, russians are directly invested in stabilising Syria, whereas americans aren't. That's a ticking bomb especially since terrorism via ISIS has already made it's way in Europe.
Hillary would have only continued the lefacy of the former US presidents: more wars in the Middle East, more luves lost on both sides.
 
Last edited:
Nice to see your name up here again. :)


I don't get this one. What's Title 9 and what does A have to dowith B?
Title IX deals with sexual assaults on college campuses. It has pushed colleges to be overzealous, to the point of denying men basic due process rights. The end result has been a lot of lawsuits by men, now increasingly successul lawsuits.

Yup the eternal laws of physics. See the French Revolution where those who were oppressed had enough and dethroned the despots, yet in the process they became despots themselves.
Although in the end France achieved democratic rule.

But that's the whole point of having better relations with Russia: to avoid conflict escalation into war,
possibly World War 3.

First of all NATO were upping the anti against Russia too much, in order to maintain the US coalition sphere of influence in Europe. But by doing so, they were escalating a conflict which might have ended in war.

Secondly, russians are directly invested in stabilising Syria, whereas americans aren't. That's a ticking bomb especially since terrorism via ISIS has already made it's way in Europe.
Hillary would have only continued the lefacy of the former US presidents: more wars in the Middle East, more luves lost on both sides.
Russia is siding with Assad, which is going to lead to even more wars there by the people he's oppressing. Furthermore, they are invading neighboring countries to fulfill their agendas. And they pose a huge threat to Europe, and by Trump being Russia's puppet, he's going to leave the world with a much more aggressive Russia... and they're going to force Europe into war to defend themselves.

Guess who's going to be stuck backing them up. Yup, us.

And then Trump is also agitating China in a really bad way.
 
race/gender division....like most lefties that's how LJ sees the world.

Men v. women.

Minorities vs. evil fuckin' white pieces of shit.
My God, when it comes to white supremacism, you don't even have a gag reflex anymore.
 
Back
Top