MFM is the new FMF??

I don’t mind either, seeing my wife fucked by another guy is hit but so is seeing her with another woman. It’s just how we feel at the time that depends on which type of partner we want to play with
 
MFM for me as long as I get a shot at getting the guy's cock in my mouth. I would love to try a MMM too.
 
Love ambitious men like my hubby but a change of thought is required. Like already stated any horny woman can easily exhaust, pleasure and drain two men... But one cock vs two horny Pussys in need , sorry boys you won't be able to satisfy both..****o women will only work if women are open to being bi x

http://juicygif.com/albums/userpics/2014y/11/15/5/1/0346-double-penetration.gif

http://a.im9.eu/two-females-one-male-ffm-5-hardcore-xxx-mff-sex.gif

These are super hot p hotos by the way. I'd love to do either. I have wondered about what you said. From a practical standpoint is a threesome with 2 women and 1 man only going to really work if the girls are willing to play with each other? Is it normal or common in that threesome that they do? I am very bi curious so I would certainly be willing to play with another beautiful woman along with my husband. I'd love to hear from other women that did a 3some and hear how it went.
 
These are super hot p hotos by the way. I'd love to do either. I have wondered about what you said. From a practical standpoint is a threesome with 2 women and 1 man only going to really work if the girls are willing to play with each other? Is it normal or common in that threesome that they do? I am very bi curious so I would certainly be willing to play with another beautiful woman along with my husband. I'd love to hear from other women that did a 3some and hear how it went.

Hi Lynn, think about really, one cock can only fuck one pussy at a time and sharing wild you a building to orgasm is quiet frustrating. It just works better if the women interact during FMF , both sucking cock together for the man pleasure but you lips are so close you might as well kiss and while one of you is getting fucked instead of having a third wheel it hotter to eat eachother out too X it's quiet hot to share cum too at the end .this is very basic terms of course you can mix it up

https://78.media.tumblr.com/12afccd9f0c46fddb6f905f52ce831c0/tumblr_nche8rLT9S1txm2w5o1_500.gif

https://78.media.tumblr.com/7d81274fc033ee562ea7312ab2008ab0/tumblr_o82le6Aufc1qilbqfo1_500.gif

https://78.media.tumblr.com/e493e1659e5e131acef4cbc7b356c671/tumblr_n5n6tclCwq1rs6a2oo1_500.gif

Two guys though, much more straight..women will go the distance, simultaneously please two cocks either orally or using our other access points hehe x
 
These are super hot p hotos by the way. I'd love to do either. I have wondered about what you said. From a practical standpoint is a threesome with 2 women and 1 man only going to really work if the girls are willing to play with each other? Is it normal or common in that threesome that they do? I am very bi curious so I would certainly be willing to play with another beautiful woman along with my husband. I'd love to hear from other women that did a 3some and hear how it went.

Lynn - In my experience, FFM's have generally been much more pleasurable than FMM's, and, as DarkGemini suggested, lasted far, far longer.

True, the poor guy usually can't last as long as I'd like when he's the center of attention for two women, but if the two women like each other, and I mean like-like each other lol, they can continue to play with each other while he watches and recovers and then join back in when he's ready.

In my experience, this means playtime can last up to an hour and a half or more for me! (30 minutes of seduction/talking about it/(slowly)taking our clothes off :), 10-15 minutes of the three of us playing together until he bursts the first time, 15-20 minutes of me and the other woman getting to know each other better as he watches us and recovers, 15-20 minutes of him taking turns with us again, 15-20 minutes of her and I cleaning up his second mess. Rest. Cuddle. Repeat if all goes well. :heart:

With FMM everything happens much faster. It's hot, but it's way different. It's usually talk about it as you're being stripped by the guys (usually about 5 minutes max), 5 minutes of orally getting them both up to speed, 15-20 minutes of being bent and pulled, tossed around and stretched until first one guy explodes and then the other. They tend to last a little longer because most guys are kind of competitive and certainly some are a little uncomfortable being naked in front of another guy so that works in your favor too.

If you're at all bi-curious, I would highly recommend a FFM your first time. That way you have the sense of safety and security and familiarity that comes from being with your husband and the freedom to go only as far as you like with the other woman. I imagine the same thing might be true for bi-curious husbands in an FMM, but I'll let one of them speak to that. For the woman, being desired by two men (or more!) at the same time is a huge ego boost. If one of the guys is your husband or bf, you feel much safer exploring your wilder side. (the desire to feel safe in your explorations is probably more important to women than it is men, but idk.

Hope that helps. Feel free to PM me with any questions you don't want shared in public Lynn :rose:
 
Lynn - In my experience, FFM's have generally been much more pleasurable than FMM's, and, as DarkGemini suggested, lasted far, far longer.

True, the poor guy usually can't last as long as I'd like when he's the center of attention for two women, but if the two women like each other, and I mean like-like each other lol, they can continue to play with each other while he watches and recovers and then join back in when he's ready.

In my experience, this means playtime can last up to an hour and a half or more for me! (30 minutes of seduction/talking about it/(slowly)taking our clothes off :), 10-15 minutes of the three of us playing together until he bursts the first time, 15-20 minutes of me and the other woman getting to know each other better as he watches us and recovers, 15-20 minutes of him taking turns with us again, 15-20 minutes of her and I cleaning up his second mess. Rest. Cuddle. Repeat if all goes well. :heart:

With FMM everything happens much faster. It's hot, but it's way different. It's usually talk about it as you're being stripped by the guys (usually about 5 minutes max), 5 minutes of orally getting them both up to speed, 15-20 minutes of being bent and pulled, tossed around and stretched until first one guy explodes and then the other. They tend to last a little longer because most guys are kind of competitive and certainly some are a little uncomfortable being naked in front of another guy so that works in your favor too.

If you're at all bi-curious, I would highly recommend a FFM your first time. That way you have the sense of safety and security and familiarity that comes from being with your husband and the freedom to go only as far as you like with the other woman. I imagine the same thing might be true for bi-curious husbands in an FMM, but I'll let one of them speak to that. For the woman, being desired by two men (or more!) at the same time is a huge ego boost. If one of the guys is your husband or bf, you feel much safer exploring your wilder side. (the desire to feel safe in your explorations is probably more important to women than it is men, but idk.

Hope that helps. Feel free to PM me with any questions you don't want shared in public Lynn :rose:

Liz,

An interesting read, thanks :)
 
Lynn - In my experience, FFM's have generally been much more pleasurable than FMM's, and, as DarkGemini suggested, lasted far, far longer.

True, the poor guy usually can't last as long as I'd like when he's the center of attention for two women, but if the two women like each other, and I mean like-like each other lol, they can continue to play with each other while he watches and recovers and then join back in when he's ready.

In my experience, this means playtime can last up to an hour and a half or more for me! (30 minutes of seduction/talking about it/(slowly)taking our clothes off :), 10-15 minutes of the three of us playing together until he bursts the first time, 15-20 minutes of me and the other woman getting to know each other better as he watches us and recovers, 15-20 minutes of him taking turns with us again, 15-20 minutes of her and I cleaning up his second mess. Rest. Cuddle. Repeat if all goes well. :heart:

With FMM everything happens much faster. It's hot, but it's way different. It's usually talk about it as you're being stripped by the guys (usually about 5 minutes max), 5 minutes of orally getting them both up to speed, 15-20 minutes of being bent and pulled, tossed around and stretched until first one guy explodes and then the other. They tend to last a little longer because most guys are kind of competitive and certainly some are a little uncomfortable being naked in front of another guy so that works in your favor too.

If you're at all bi-curious, I would highly recommend a FFM your first time. That way you have the sense of safety and security and familiarity that comes from being with your husband and the freedom to go only as far as you like with the other woman. I imagine the same thing might be true for bi-curious husbands in an FMM, but I'll let one of them speak to that. For the woman, being desired by two men (or more!) at the same time is a huge ego boost. If one of the guys is your husband or bf, you feel much safer exploring your wilder side. (the desire to feel safe in your explorations is probably more important to women than it is men, but idk.

Hope that helps. Feel free to PM me with any questions you don't want shared in public Lynn :rose:

That is a great response Liz. I imagine a mfm to be more raw sexuality and a mff to be more sensual and gentle. I would like to clarify some terms as well. I use mfm instead of mmf to clarify that in that instance the men do not play with each other where in a mmf they would. I generally us mff for a 3some with two women because from everything I read, in that threesome it is very very common for the women (even generally straight women) to play with each other some. Is that your experience? i think it could be hot to see the two guys do stuff iwth each other, it just seems rare. As you indicated, one woman is capable of entertaining two guys easily so there is no need for them to do MM stuff, where with two women, the women may need to get some attention from, or to, the other woman to keep everyone satisfied and involved. If my husband and I did a threesome with another woman, and he came pretty fast, i think it would be super hot to make love to the other woman alone while my husband watched and recharged.
 
That is a great response Liz. I imagine a mfm to be more raw sexuality and a mff to be more sensual and gentle. I would like to clarify some terms as well. I use mfm instead of mmf to clarify that in that instance the men do not play with each other where in a mmf they would. I generally us mff for a 3some with two women because from everything I read, in that threesome it is very very common for the women (even generally straight women) to play with each other some. Is that your experience? i think it could be hot to see the two guys do stuff iwth each other, it just seems rare. As you indicated, one woman is capable of entertaining two guys easily so there is no need for them to do MM stuff, where with two women, the women may need to get some attention from, or to, the other woman to keep everyone satisfied and involved. If my husband and I did a threesome with another woman, and he came pretty fast, i think it would be super hot to make love to the other woman alone while my husband watched and recharged.

I never thought about the order of the letter meaning different things but you might be and probably are right Lynn. Does anyone else know if that's true?

I guess most of the times with two guys I'd have to describe at MFM then. I can only remember once where I guess you'd call it MMF. All of my experience with two women though has been FFM - because at the very least it always included light petting and kissing and hands that were free to roam as they pleased. :)
 
Yikes! I didn't realize how long it was! Sorry!

It was long, full and dripping with sexy hot info. Thanks Liz.

I like the idea of a woman being serviced by two guys, as long as she's the one in control.

I think this is one of the sexiest MFM's I've ever seen.
 
With FMM everything happens much faster. It's hot, but it's way different. It's usually talk about it as you're being stripped by the guys (usually about 5 minutes max), 5 minutes of orally getting them both up to speed, 15-20 minutes of being bent and pulled, tossed around and stretched until first one guy explodes and then the other. They tend to last a little longer because most guys are kind of competitive and certainly some are a little uncomfortable being naked in front of another guy so that works in your favor too.

Yikes! :eek:

That sounds awful, and not at all the way I imagine (or hope) that a 3-way with two gentlemen would go. :confused:

I saw Numi post recently that she likes her lovers to have skill and finesse. I certainly agree, and that takes t.i.m.e. Long, slow, langorous lovemaking, a slow burn is what i have in mind. Possibly a quickie in the beginning if they don't think they'll be able to hold off, but after that, I'd expect an extended period of very sensual back-and-forth as they take turns bringing me to climax. Several times.

Depending on their stamina and the length of their refractory period, I may want to get them off after I've had a couple of rounds, and then again later, of perhaps not let them come until the very end. I do have friends who enjoy being hard and thick for quite a while, without having a need for immediate release, I think that quality would be important for a potential partner to possess.

Of course, I have no RL experience with this, but I would hope *fingers crossed* that there would be some men out there who could accommodate my particular fantasy. :eek:
 
I never thought about the order of the letter meaning different things but you might be and probably are right Lynn. Does anyone else know if that's true?

I guess most of the times with two guys I'd have to describe at MFM then. I can only remember once where I guess you'd call it MMF. All of my experience with two women though has been FFM - because at the very least it always included light petting and kissing and hands that were free to roam as they pleased. :)

Yes, the MM or FF mean bisexual. My ultimate bucket list would be a MMFF.

I’ve done fmf, mfmf, mfm, mff, and mfff... they were all interesting but the ffm was my favorite for the reasons Liz said
 
Last edited:
I feel like if a girl is a friend of mine then I would gladly have a threesome with her in any combination--MFM, FFM, MMF, as long as we are all having fun I wouldn't care. BUT, if I was in love with her, I wouldn't want to share her with anyone, male or female.

This sounds kind of stupid, because if I love her then why wouldn't I want to pleasure her in every possible way--including bringing someone else into the mix (assuming, of course, that that is what she wants). But I don't think I would or could see someone else touching her like that without becoming jealous and territorial (not sure that's the word I should use, but that's the one that pops into my mind, especilly since it's a caveman-like emotion).

I don't know if that's romantic or selfish or both? Luckily, no one is offering so it's entirely academic.

Just wondering what everyone else thinks?
 
Both scenarios are very intense and exciting in their own right.. Generally I think women are more comfortable with having experiences with the same sex but both are just focusing on the different desires of each partner...

Men are excited visually and who can blame them for wanting two beautiful women but in my opinion it will work better in terms of satisfying both females if the women please eachother also..

http://66.media.tumblr.com/f6d2e746828fd3e8412eb5196274f145/tumblr_inline_o9p3f1ophj1rrkplo_500.gif

This is all about the girls , we can be insatiable so this all about trying to satisfy the thirst X hmm

https://images.sex.com/images/pinporn/2014/05/07/620/5907712.gif

Of course these are just two regular scenarios, everyone is more open to experiences now, so MMF is extremely hot, foursomes and Involving a trans would be extremely hot also...
 
Yeah, I don't see it as an "either/or", mutually exclusive situation. Why not do both? FMF and MFM both have their appeal and their uses, so it's best to experiment with both if you're into both. If you're not, well, that's also a valid option if you prefer one or the other that much.
 
One of my favorite positions btw - staring into my husband's eyes as he thrusts in and out of some poor little moaning cutie with his big, thick happy manhood as her mouth and tongue lap at my jealous, soaking wet taco is just such absolute bliss it's hard to describe if you've never experienced it! :heart:

I like this.....described from a woman's perspective, acknowledging the jealousy that men and women alike can feel, yet embracing and working through that jealousy to use it to enhance rather than poison a polyamorous arrangement and group sexual encounters.
 
Just wondering what everyone else thinks?

Early in our marriage, when my wife went visiting in our home town without me, I used to tell/remind her to take her diaphragm so she didn't come home with anything she didn't leave with because I recognized I had no control and I wasn't her first by several. Now, since BC is no longer relevant, if she came home with a little extra flavor, I would savor it. But I don't think it is likely.

She has long said she wasn't willing to share me. But I think the idea of a little MMF, MFM, FMF, FFM, or even just MM is hot (which is why I'm on Literotica.)
 
Back
Top