XirixSeven
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2017
- Posts
- 132
Thanks for your post, jimmytm.
I quote this one sentence of it as a prime example of how language and terms must needs adapt when social norms change and people's shared experience tells a tale which will no longer fit the 'old' language. Perhaps there was a time when hardly anyone could conceive of the arrangement we're discussing here except in terms derogatory of the husband. That probably links with the old notions of a wife being in some sense the 'possession' of her husband. Experience has thankfully moved us on from that. The term, once accepted for the whole range of the possibilities of that lifestyle, fits it no longer. So we need to either drop it altogether, or give it a much narrower definition.
90% of what you wrote suckonsimon is valid. Men turned on by watching their wives with another man does not fall into the traditional concept of cuck. But certainly, even in our post-feminist times, cuck can still be a thing. A man whose woman stays with him for financial security and lives off of his sole breadwinning, occasionally she gives him sex, but she makes it clear she has other encounters, and he stays with her because she's hot, and she does not include him in her other encounters, that man is a cuck. A woman fucking every guy in town, including the men the guy knows, and he is clueless of this, she is cucking him and he is a cuck. There are other such examples.
I think you point out correctly that we need another term of language, as this consensual thing is merely a form of fetish excitement.