HarlotMinx
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Posts
- 832
My point remains that you were able to get married. Too many people have the view that the U.S. is suppoed to be entirely homogenous, with every state looking and feeling the same. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Um.... yes but her marriage license is not recognized here in Virginia, further more she is not afforded any of the benefits due to a married couple. For example, when she files her taxes she can't file as a married couple, if her partner is in a pension plan and dies then etoile wouldn't see a penny of it even if she also contributed her own money to the pension plan, she can't hold a child as a couple with her spouse. Unless their is a will, if her spouse dies she has no control over the funeral arrangements or ANY of the estate and she would have to suffer the tax penalties on that estate like a unmarried couple. Without power of attorney she can't help her spouse make any medical decisions.... yeah great she's married in CT.... she's married in name only as long as she lives anywhere else. She gets no Social Security, Medicare, and disability benefits through the government, for that matter most insurance plans will refuse to cover the other as a spouse nor can she take family leave or bereavement leave if her spouse is sick. No privileged marital communications and my favorite, she can't sue for the wrongful death of her spouse.
Their are some laws that should be state regulated and not homogeneous but marriage is a legal contract between two people with a set of benefits and very clearly should be federal. If non same sex marriages have federal recognition of benefits then so should same sex if it's recognized in even one state. Marriage should not be a states law and the only reason it's not federal is that the supreme court and the current legislation have been avoiding the topic like the plague. And when it comes to marriage, your right it's not religion per se that causes people to be intolerant of it, it's the people themselves but religion sure as hell is being used as the vehicle to unite people against same sex marriage and in this case IS an example of religion limiting someone's rights. The fact that religions are being used as a tax free means of moving million of dollars into anti homosexual advertising makes it involved.