Is "equal protection under the law" a complete and total lie?

[Angel]

I was thinking very similarly but on a different topic on another thread about a week ago.

He's very focused.

I was going to my boyfriend's "Sociology Of Sexuality" classes with him for awhile.

You'd swear you were taking a "WOMEN WILL TAKE OVER THE WORLD OR ELSE!!!!!!!!!!" class.


I had to stop going, it was really, really irritating.

 

[Oscuridad]

I was going to my boyfriend's "Sociology Of Sexuality" classes with him for awhile.

You'd swear you were taking a "WOMEN WILL TAKE OVER THE WORLD OR ELSE!!!!!!!!!!" class.


I had to stop going, it was really, really irritating.

Absolutists are always tiresome. It comes of paying attention to nothing else for far too long.

Our culture messes up boys who turn into messed up men.

He's taking his beef to the extreme.

 

[Angel]

Absolutists are always tiresome. It comes of paying attention to nothing else for far too long.

Our culture messes up boys who turn into messed up men.

He's taking his beef to the extreme.

I was thinking about inviting her to Lit and hooking them up. I wonder if it would recreate the Big Bang.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

I was going to my boyfriend's "Sociology Of Sexuality" classes with him for awhile.

You'd swear you were taking a "WOMEN WILL TAKE OVER THE WORLD OR ELSE!!!!!!!!!!" class.


I had to stop going, it was really, really irritating.

Here's a hint for ya. You never left that class.

Read Maureen Dowd some time. Does she sound familiar? Of course.. she only says what women are thinking deep down.

 

[Bent]

I'm thinking that LT was denied WIC as a child.

 

[Angel]

I'm thinking that LT was denied WIC as a child.

I was under the impression that WIC benefits were for human children.

 

[Bent]

I was under the impression that WIC benefits were for human children.

My bad.

 

[Peregrinator]

(2) The following priorities based on categorical eligibility shall
be applied when vacancies occur after the local agency has filled all caseload, except that these priorities shall not apply to the minimum protected caseload assigned under Sec. 247.10(a) (2)(i).
(i) Priority I. Pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and infants.
(ii) Priority II. Children ages 1 through 3.
(iii) Priority III. Children ages 4 through 5.
(iv) Priority IV. Postpartum women.
(v) Priority V. Elderly persons.

I'm, like, not seeing where this has anything at all to do with WIC benefits for men, but hey, that's just me.

*sigh* Wriggle, wriggle, wriggle.

Sec. 247.7 Certification.

(a) Eligibility requirements. To be certified as eligible to receive
supplemental foods under the Program, each applicant shall meet the
following requirements:
(1) Categorical eligibility as an infant, child, pregnant,
postpartum or breastfeeding woman, or elderly person;

C'mon, LT, you can do better. The law clearly states eligibility. Though it's tempting, I'm not going to insult you by explaining the quoted bit above. Just say, okay, the law provides for children , infants, and breastfeeding moms. Whoops. And get on with the rest of your argument. One exploded example doesn't take your whole case down. Let it go.

Oscuridad: Focused was a very neutral way of putting it. I appreciate that you're not playing poopyhead, either.

 

[Calamity Jane]

If not, then

Why do they have "Women, Infants and Children" vouchers and no "Men, Infants and Children" programs?

Because WIC is a nutrional program aimed at pregnant and breastfeeding women. It's geared towards making sure that children and pregnant/lactating mothers receive proper nutrition, in an effort to ensure healthy children. Incidentally, a low income father can qualify for WIC, based on his children. He just wouldn't be able to qualify for the additional vouchers that pregnant/lactating mothers qualify for unless he was pregnant or lactating.

Why the "Violence Against Women Act"? Why isn't there a law against violence against men?

I actually have problems with this and other 'hate crime' issues. Assault is assault, I really don't care who it's aimed at.


Why do men have to sign up for the Draft and not women?

Because it's an archaic law?

Why are men required to pay more for insurance than women?

Because men tend to take less notice of their health, and therefore are a greater risk for expensive procedures. Statistically, men don't live as long, so the insurance company is more likely to have to pay out on their policies.

A sidenote, it costs FAR less to get private insurance for a man than it does for a woman of childbearing age.

 

[sharpchick]

Sigh

After much deliberation, I've decided that although it would be so much fun to continue to exchange witty repartee' with LT, it's just ain't sporting to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man. . .

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Sigh

After much deliberation, I've decided that although it would be so much fun to continue to exchange witty repartee' with LT, it's just ain't sporting to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man. . .

If you are this ineffective against me armed then maybe you need a tactical nuke wit attack to make things fair.

Oh yeah and I STILL got laid tonight after telling you so often what a fucking barnacle gold digging worthless sack of shit you are.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

*sigh* Wriggle, wriggle, wriggle.



C'mon, LT, you can do better. The law clearly states eligibility. Though it's tempting, I'm not going to insult you by explaining the quoted bit above. Just say, okay, the law provides for children , infants, and breastfeeding moms. Whoops. And get on with the rest of your argument. One exploded example doesn't take your whole case down. Let it go.

Oscuridad: Focused was a very neutral way of putting it. I appreciate that you're not playing poopyhead, either.

Indeed it provides for children , infants, and breastfeeding moms. My point *gasp* *ducks* is who it doesn't provide for. Does anyone know who that is?

 

[phrodeau]

Indeed it provides for children , infants, and breastfeeding moms. My point *gasp* *ducks* is who it doesn't provide for. Does anyone know who that is?

Yes, men without balls.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Yes, men without balls.

Leave
yourself
out
of
this.

 

[Bent]

Yes, men without balls.

I bet LT thinks it's the women's fault that he can't get pregnant and get WIC.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

I bet LT thinks it's the women's fault that he can't get pregnant and get WIC.

Don't you, like, have some mexicans to kill?

PS: I heard gay marriages are now legal in California. Got luggage?

 

[thegirlfriday11]

If not, then

Why do they have "Women, Infants and Children" vouchers and no "Men, Infants and Children" programs?

Why the "Violence Against Women Act"? Why isn't there a law against violence against men?

Why do men have to sign up for the Draft and not women?

Why are men required to pay more for insurance than women?




Equal protection? For who?

Do you guys really think you're ever going to get laid spewing all that servile "chivalrous" bullshit trollage that you're typing up right now?

when those laws were enacted, there was nothing that gave women and children rights and protection from people that would abuse and/or exploit them

only in the last few decades have women been bold enough to physically defend themselves or even attack men

laws do need to change with a changing society

the draft...women are considered to be the physically weaker sex, more likely to be "emotional", and likely more vulnerable during wartime...perhaps even considered problematic because of it

women are less aggressive drivers than males and have fewer costly accidents

 

[phrodeau]

WIC discriminates against rich people, too. It's just not fai-ai-air!

 

[thegirlfriday11]

I bet LT thinks it's the women's fault that he can't get pregnant and get WIC.

LMFAO

 

[Bent]

LMFAO

Well, it is our fault he can't get laid.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Well, it is our fault he can't get laid.

This coming from the supposedly married woman who clocks at 35 posts per day? Damn, that's rich. Too bad you can't find a man in real life willing to put up with you, much less support you, or you'd actually have a life.

 

[Angel]

Indeed it provides for children , infants, and breastfeeding moms. My point *gasp* *ducks* is who it doesn't provide for. Does anyone know who that is?

Men and Women who aren't providing nourishment for children via their body?

For about the 199238712876327154th time. WIC benefits are for the children.

 

[thegirlfriday11]

Well, it is our fault he can't get laid.

absolutely true

not on my life would i ever fuck him, would you?


yessireee... i gladly contribute to his lack of sex

 

[thegirlfriday11]

For about the 199238712876327154th time. WIC benefits are for the children.

absolutely

but at the same time, i don't think it's right for people to continue having children if they can't support the ones they do have

but in no way do i think the children should suffer for their parents stupidity, so they have to be cared for

 

[Rubenesque]

absolutely true

not on my life would i ever fuck him, would you?


yessireee... i gladly contribute to his lack of sex

You just made my skin crawl.