Is "equal protection under the law" a complete and total lie?

LovingTongue said:
Crysede would you be happy if I, like, laid my coat in the mud for you to walk on? :D :p :devil:

I don't know about Crys, but that would certainly keep my shoes dry.
 
LovingTongue said:
Crysede would you be happy if I, like, laid my coat in the mud for you to walk on? :D :p :devil:
Hiking boots caked in a layer of good, honest mud are the sign of a healthy mind.

You coat-laying freaks are responsible for everything that’s wrong with the world today :mad:

Oscuridad said:
Crysede is my personal posting hero.
:eek:

So . . . do I get a cool posting-hero outfit? :D

Peregrinator said:
And, hi. You're new to me...nice to meet you.
Hi :)
 
Their is no such thing as equal protection. We are all slaves to big corporations. There the overlords, and the goverment is the plantation owner
 
Because of my eternal deppression. Add in disdain for all the repeative things in life. Get up at1AM to go work, come home and by the time im finished doing all the bullshit its time to go to sleep again . After 12 years of being a drone im just spent.
 
To be honest im to chicken shit to do the shotgun to the head thing.... and i wish i had some happy pills. So I get to internalize it and hope i dont snap eventualy and start sniping people:)
 
crysede said:
Hiking boots caked in a layer of good, honest mud are the sign of a healthy mind.

You coat-laying freaks are responsible for everything that’s wrong with the world today :mad:
That's the problem with people like you. You blame everything on the men.

You, who buy stuff that is made from dead trees, and drive stuff that pollutes the environment, and who basically live off the largesse, hard work, blood sweat and tears of the men you vilify, have no integrity when you try and accuse "coat laying freaks" aka men of being "responsible for everything that’s wrong with the world today".

But that gets down to the point of why you're in this thread in the first place.

You, as a woman, don't like to hear men deciding they're not going to be chivalrous foot slaves any more. You see it as a threat to your "have my cake and eat it too" world where you get to complain endlessly about how men are keeping you down and doing mean things to you while at the same time you enjoy favoritist discrimination from law enforcement, insurance companies, and especially in times of emergency when it's your ass that gets rescued first from a burning building or a sinking ship. You're like that man hating loser Emerald Eyed who whines about how she has to be a man's cook, maid, prostitute and all that bullshit, while having your hand out 24/7 saying "I'm a woman, buy me a this do that for me blah blah blah". That's the full extent of your character, if you mind that I be so generous as to call it that.

You don't want equality... you want the same thing as any male chauvenist pig wants - you want to have all the priviledges and none of the responsibilities.

You are exactly what you accuse people like Frimost of being.

THAT's why you're in this thread talking so much shit.

So now... can we please get back to the old recycled "LT can't get laid" comebacks? :D
 
LovingTongue said:
You, as a woman, don't like to hear men deciding they're not going to be chivalrous foot slaves any more.
Exactly. The reason I don’t want you laying your coat across mud puddles for me is that I want you to be my chivalrous foot slave.

Makes perfect sense.

You see it as a threat to your "have my cake and eat it too" world where you get to complain endlessly about how men are keeping you down and doing mean things to you while at the same time you enjoy favoritist discrimination from law enforcement, insurance companies, and especially in times of emergency when it's your ass that gets rescued first from a burning building or a sinking ship.
No, no, no, that’s not it at all. I see coat-laying as a threat to my “I ain’t no pretty-girl you coat laying freak; isn’t there a kitten up a tree somewhere that needs saving?” world where I get to chuckle endlessly about people assuming my ass is in need of their rescue :p

You're like that man hating loser Emerald Eyed who whines about how she has to be a man's cook, maid, prostitute and all that bullshit, while having your hand out 24/7 saying "I'm a woman, buy me a this do that for me blah blah blah". That's the full extent of your character, if you mind that I be so generous as to call it that.
Actually I’m much, much worse.

See, I don’t just complain about being a homemaker, I actually refuse to do it: I won’t be the cook, I won’t be the maid, and I won’t be the financially dependent one. I’ve sunk so deep into the moral abyss that the term “character” can’t even be coherently applied :eek:

You don't want equality... you want the same thing as any male chauvenist pig wants - you want to have all the priviledges and none of the responsibilities.
Hell, man, I already benefit from more un-earned racial, social, and economic privileges than you could shake a stick at lol. If I wanted privilege without responsibility I could just sit back and enjoy :D

So now... can we please get back to the old recycled "LT can't get laid" comebacks? :D
That was totally over-the-line and uncalled for - I would never recycle a comeback :mad:
 
LT, I can't understand how you have decided that all women are sitting around waiting for men to "buy me, give me, take me." I have always paid my own way, and more than a few times, I was the one with a job, or my job contributed more to our income as a couple than his did.

The glass ceiling is still firmly in place, but we are chipping away at it. I think your stated belief that all women are whiny-assed gold-diggers must have been pre-empted at some point (maybe recently) by an independent woman who takes care of business, and didn't have the time or energy to put up with this line of bullshit from you. The more you spew on this topic, the more I believe what you really would like to see is women completely dependent on men, and totally subordinated to their will.

Fortunately, I know all men aren't like you.
 
sharpchick said:
LT, I can't understand how you have decided that all women are sitting around waiting for men to "buy me, give me, take me." I have always paid my own way, and more than a few times, I was the one with a job, or my job contributed more to our income as a couple than his did.
Those miniscule examples are superfluous and not even part of the original post I made.

The law itself favors women over men. You get preferential treatment when it comes to the selective service (not having to register), domestic violence disputes (women's complaints are taken seriously, and men's are not), crime (the DOJ stats show that women serve less time for the same crime, etc.), and so on. Child custody judgements and alimony are now weaker examples of preferential treatment toward women than they were in the past but the discrimination there continues to persist. You also have economic advantages as well, such as all sorts of lower insurance premiums.

All this, and still women gripe about how the evil male is out to keep them down and how men are pigs and blah blah this and Maureen Dowd that.

The glass ceiling is still firmly in place, but we are chipping away at it. I think your stated belief that all women are whiny-assed gold-diggers must have been pre-empted at some point (maybe recently) by an independent woman who takes care of business,
Ah hah. My original complaint that the law favors women over men and the tacked on references I made to the slavery of chivalry somehow comes from experiences with women who didn't want any chivalry?

Do you realize how stupid and ass backwards your argument is?

and didn't have the time or energy to put up with this line of bullshit from you. The more you spew on this topic, the more I believe what you really would like to see is women completely dependent on men, and totally subordinated to their will.
ROTFLMAO. It's desperate recycled bullshit like this that proves you aren't the big independent woman you say you are.

The moment someone starts railing against preferential discrimination it's always expected that some woman who's scared shitless of losing her legally preferred status will come along and accuse him of exactly the opposite of what he said: of wanting women to be subordinated.

Now if you can find where I said you shouldn't be allowed any rights a man has, then please, quote it here. Otherwise you're just spewing bullshit. But then again what can I expect? You'll recycle that "women completely dependent on men" lie another 15 pages or so without even a shred of reference to what I actually said. That's pretty much the extent of your character.
 
Sharpchick, how dare you confront LT with facts. He's having a difficult enough time coming to terms with all those laws created by male chauvinists which somehow favor women.
 
phrodeau said:
Sharpchick, how dare you confront LT with facts. He's having a difficult enough time coming to terms with all those laws created by male chauvinists which somehow favor women.
God damn, you're stupid.

Does the fact that women don't have to sign up for selective service favor
a) men
b) women
?

Explain.

Byebye Froggy, you lost again.
 
crysede said:

See, I don’t just complain about being a homemaker, I actually refuse to do it: I won’t be the cook, I won’t be the maid, and I won’t be the financially dependent one. I’ve sunk so deep into the moral abyss that the term “character” can’t even be coherently applied :eek:
The fact that you think not being financially dependent, etc., is defined by me as a lack of character, proves you have no reading comprehension skills.

Just like when you falsely accused me of making racist posts. :rolleyes:
 
I was referring to this:

LovingTongue said:
If you are this ineffective against me armed then maybe you need a tactical nuke wit attack to make things fair.

Oh yeah and I STILL got laid tonight after telling you so often what a fucking barnacle gold digging worthless sack of shit you are.

My relative success in life has not come from government benefits, nor the sweat of the brow of any man - it has come from me working my ass off and making my own way in my chosen field. I have not benefitted from any affirmative action programs, nor I have I slept my way up the ladder. I am fucking good at what I do, even in my male dominated profession, and it's been recognized, by both my peers and my adversaries.

For you to continue to deal in absolutes and sweeping generalities only underscores the total lack of understanding you possess about the "discrimination" you claim men face. Insurance rates are determined by actuarial tables. The longer life expectancy of women (for life insurance quotes, for example) is statistically due, in part, to the risk taking behavior of men of similar ages, and also takes into account genetic history of disease, etc. in families.

I don't expect you to believe any of that though, as you have proven - and obviously intend to continue to prove - that you are a pinhead for whom a little bit of knowledge about a few things suffices, and you feel no need to actually arm yourself with facts. If LT thinks it, then by god, it's gospel.

Makes you wonder who's the worthless sack of shit here. . .
 
crysede said:
Exactly. The reason I don’t want you laying your coat across mud puddles for me is that I want you to be my chivalrous foot slave.

Makes perfect sense.

No, no, no, that’s not it at all. I see coat-laying as a threat to my “I ain’t no pretty-girl you coat laying freak; isn’t there a kitten up a tree somewhere that needs saving?” world where I get to chuckle endlessly about people assuming my ass is in need of their rescue :p

Actually I’m much, much worse.

See, I don’t just complain about being a homemaker, I actually refuse to do it: I won’t be the cook, I won’t be the maid, and I won’t be the financially dependent one. I’ve sunk so deep into the moral abyss that the term “character” can’t even be coherently applied :eek:

Hell, man, I already benefit from more un-earned racial, social, and economic privileges than you could shake a stick at lol. If I wanted privilege without responsibility I could just sit back and enjoy :D

That was totally over-the-line and uncalled for - I would never recycle a comeback :mad:

Heh heh.

I :heart: this post
 
LovingTongue said:
You're like that man hating loser Emerald Eyed who whines about how she has to be a man's cook, maid, prostitute and all that bullshit, while having your hand out 24/7 saying "I'm a woman, buy me a this do that for me blah blah blah". That's the full extent of your character, if you mind that I be so generous as to call it that.

Now this has been recycled by you a few times.
 
sharpchick said:
For you to continue to deal in absolutes and sweeping generalities only underscores the total lack of understanding you possess about the "discrimination" you claim men face. Insurance rates are determined by actuarial tables. The longer life expectancy of women (for life insurance quotes, for example) is statistically due, in part, to the risk taking behavior of men of similar ages, and also takes into account genetic history of disease, etc. in families.
As usual, you miss the most bold faced points. Such as, if you're born a male, there isn't anything you can do that will get you equality in insurance rates. No matter how safe you live, or how safe you drive, you are still cursed for being male. All your life, no matter how good and healthy a person you are, you pay more than a woman will. At that point, it becomes in effect a males only tax. But again, you're too retarded to get it.

I don't expect you to believe any of that though,
Seeing as I just proved beyond a doubt why it's wrong...

If LT thinks it, then by god, it's gospel.
The problem is, you don't think. If your ass got stuck with registering for the draft and paying extra for insurance, you'd be the first one up protesting about it.

Hypocrite.
 
Back
Top