I know you too well to share my kinks.

[PrettyLilPussy19]

How many are in a horde? I’m thinking a horde.

I’ll leave that to your discretion. It’s not just for my entertainment, after all.

Yes. I’d like this to get Oscar® consideration.

I prefer to treat this like a Zombie apocalypse. I want to be chased, tackled, stripped and fucked, by Sex Zombies. Instead of BRAINS, they say COCK!

Showering is acceptable. When we’re finished I never want to see these people again as I will be pretty embarrassed that I allowed this to happen. Everyone will have to run away, in unison, the same way they came in.

Ive never read so many right answers in a row.

 

[MissSNG]

Meeting the local holy-man (priest, rabbi, preacher...)

Is this a bad thing or hot???

Just me?

 

[UsuallyPresent]

Is this a bad thing or hot???

Just me?

Given most of the holeymen I'm aware of around here, I'd not consider it hot. A couple of the younger born-again preachers or their wives, maybe, but I'm not really interested in Domming any 'of the cloth' in general. Whilst I'm twisty and kinked, I'm not particularly bent that way.

 

[MissSNG]

Given most of the holeymen I'm aware of around here, I'd not consider it hot. A couple of the younger born-again preachers or their wives, maybe, but I'm not really interested in Domming any 'of the cloth' in general. Whilst I'm twisty and kinked, I'm not particularly bent that way.

I’m thinking more along the lines of the priest from Fleabag
Or this hot vicar from TikTok specifically lol

 

[UsuallyPresent]

I’m thinking more along the lines of the priest from Fleabag
Or this hot vicar from TikTok specifically lol

I dunno Fleabag, sorry - culturally illiterate, I know.

Buttttt I did find this! https://nypost.com/2021/09/11/conservative-catholic-bishop-leaves-church-for-erotic-writer/

 

[Wand3rlust]

I’m thinking more along the lines of the priest from Fleabag
Or this hot vicar from TikTok specifically lol

To be fair, Andrew Scott is just hot.

 

[MissSNG]

View attachment 2562286

To be fair, Andrew Scott is just hot.

Yassssssss

 

[hotwords229_A]

Some of you may need to confess your sinful thoughts . . .

^^^CAUTION: Super Hot Porn.

 

[MissSNG]

I dunno Fleabag, sorry - culturally illiterate, I know.

Buttttt I did find this! https://nypost.com/2021/09/11/conservative-catholic-bishop-leaves-church-for-erotic-writer/

For anyone who has the TikTok look up the hot vicar - Thomas I think?

 

[UsuallyPresent]

Some of you may need to confess your sinful thoughts . . .

^^^CAUTION: Super Hot Porn.

the WHAT of the Lord?!?

 

[Apisto42]

Here's ChatGPT's job description for you:

Position Title:
Strategic Partner, Reverse Harem Operations

Department:
Personal Services & Intimate Logistics

Reports To:
Chief Executive Empress (CEE)

Position Overview:
The Reverse Harem Division is seeking highly motivated, multi-skilled gentlemen to fill immediate openings as Strategic Partners. This position requires excellence in both independent performance and collaborative ensemble work, with a demonstrated ability to handle fast-paced environments, extended engagements, and shifting positions. The ideal candidate will be flexible, adaptable, and willing to perform at peak levels under close supervision—or, when requested, take initiative without oversight.

Key Duties & Responsibilities:

Deliver consistent, high-touch service with a focus on satisfaction metrics and long-term retention.

Rotate responsibilities across multiple service verticals, including but not limited to: emotional support, physical maintenance, morale boosting, and full-spectrum entertainment.

Demonstrate proficiency in both high-intensity and low-intensity workloads (e.g., sprinting and lounging).

Uphold high standards of presentation (uniform optional, confidence mandatory).

Participate in regular performance evaluations; feedback may be immediate, verbal, or delivered via subtle body language.

Ensure timely delivery of compliments, acts of devotion, and strategic cuddles.

Maintain discretion regarding all sensitive information (and sensitive areas).


Minimum Qualifications:

Bachelor’s degree in Charm, or equivalent field experience in Flattery & Seduction.

Proven track record of stamina in demanding roles; endurance testing may be administered.

Demonstrated ability to follow instructions while also providing assertive leadership when called upon.

Strong oral and interpersonal communication skills (fluency in multiple tongues encouraged).

Capacity for heavy lifting (spirits, shopping bags, and occasionally the Empress).

Reliable availability, including nights, weekends, and spontaneous overtime.


Preferred Qualifications:

Advanced certification in Massage Arts, Culinary Pleasures, or Bedside Management.

Strong improvisational skills with a flair for roleplay and scenario-based problem solving.

Ability to thrive in a competitive yet collaborative team setting; comfort with rotational scheduling.

Excellent time management, particularly in balancing quick turnaround projects with slow, luxurious deliverables.

Prior experience in high-touch hospitality or intimate concierge services highly valued.


Desired Competencies:

Flexibility (physical and metaphorical).

Resilience under pressure, with a positive attitude and a safe word-friendly mindset.

Strong sense of humor with willingness to engage in witty repartee and double entendres.

Commitment to professional growth, personal development, and ongoing… training sessions.


Compensation & Benefits:

Highly competitive rewards package, tailored to performance.

Ongoing professional development opportunities (on-the-job training provided daily).

Non-monetary perks, including unlimited pillow access, gourmet dining experiences, and occasional travel.

I’m so close…

 

[Apisto42]

Some of you may need to confess your sinful thoughts . . .

^^^CAUTION: Super Hot Porn.

I love the look of resignation.

 

[MindYaBitness]

I love the look of resignation.

Yes, that's my treasured compliment, when he tells me how much he loves my resigned my blow jobs

 

[Apisto42]

Yes, that's my treasured compliment, when he tells me how much he loves my resigned my blow jobs

Hey, I’ll take a resigned bj over no bj any day.

 

[hotwords229_A]

I love the look of resignation.

She must have a lot to abone for.

 

[Wand3rlust]

 

[Mei5ter]

Would you like to Bang my Gang?

Do you fantasize about taking part in a gangbang?

No.

Is it one of those fantasies best left a fantasy? Why?
Is being the center of a gangbang, for you, about being the focus of pleasure, being used like the town bicycle, a total breakdown of all social taboos, or just the feeling of so many bodies on yours?

As others have said, I'm not sure how a straight man can be the centre of a gangbang. Objectively, I can see the physical and emotional thrill of being at the centre, and being the person being fed an endless diet of cock. I can imagine that the sheer overwhelming physicality of that must be something you can't otherwise experience in quite the same way, although if you're creative with toys...maybe?

What is the appeal of being part of a gangbang if you’re the many and not “the one”? How does being one of many give you pleasure? (This isn’t worded well)

When you talk about one-to-many relationships, my first thought is of database design. And I'm not a database designer. So that gives you some idea of my enthusiasm here.

How many guys could you take at once, how many women, or how many of both?

This is honestly a question I've never thought about.

Let's start with the basics. I can only physically fuck one person at a time. I don't have a condition like diphallic terata (?sp), for example. And without making exaggerated size claims, my dick doesn't operate at the subatomic particle level, so there's no possibility of doing some kind of Schrodinger's cock thing where it's in two states simultaneously as long as it isn't being observed. Which is a shame, because otherwise it might be possible to fuck several people simultaneously as long as we keep the lights off. But I digress.

So then we're back to basic male physical limitations. If I'm going to cum with each person I fuck in a single gangbang session then...two?  Maybe three with a reasonable break between the second and third? But I'm not sure that would be any different, physically at least, from fucking one person twice or three times. For a woman it's different - she doesn't need to wait while her partner gets hard again (or doesn't) because the next man is already lined up and ready to go....

Is being out of control part of the thrill of a gangbang?

If you're on the receiving end, I guess?

Aside from the pic above, gangbangs seem generally geared toward the woman as the focus, what would a male centered gangbang look like in your mind?

As others have said, this is an interesting dynamic. The woman is definitely the focus - who remembers Guy #7? - but gangbangs feel like they belong in the territory of women being used for men's enjoyment so...an ambiguity there.

A male-centered gangbang? I can give you two possibilities. One might involve several women feeding a man dick pills and taking turns to ride him as a human sex toy, using him for their pleasure and to hell with whether he cums. Would that even be physically possible? No clue, but I put it out there as a fantasy men might like.

Personally? Gangbangs aren't my thing - I'm a one-on-one kind of guy - but, as a fantasy, I could get behind a line-up of three cheerleaders. As in...literally get behind. And take turns, with a couple of minutes fucking each in turn, to see who's going to be captain of the cheer squad. As a fantasy, that might work for me, purely for the visuals and the fact that sleazy, stereotyped male fantasies can still be hot occasionally?

Would you be an active participant, meaning sucking, thrusting, jerking and swallowing

....

or a passive participant, meaning lying, writhing and moaning?

If I want lying, writhing and moaning, I'll just watch that video of Nigel Farage being grilled by the Senate. And I don't.

What would you like to know about gangbangs?

Men? First or last?

 

[hotwords229_A]

I'm not sure how a straight man can be the centre of a gangbang . . . So then we're back to basic male physical limitations. If I'm going to cum with each person I fuck in a single gangbang session then...two?  

So now the questions becomes, is it a gangbang if it’s a bunch of women on a male in the center of it all.

I say YES! Mainly because of the original pic posted. Obviously, we are not capable of giving sexual satisfaction to a group of women. Some women would argue we can’t give it to a single woman!

The best number of women for a guy is 4, one on the dick, one on your face and one on each hand. Possibly 5 if she can get off using a strap on on your butt. However, due to the limitations of chewing bubblegum and walking, we obviously aren’t going to give them much in the way of oral, vaginal and fingering because our brain can’t focus on all of those things at once.

But, to me, a gangbang is, or should be, about the person in the center and not the group. I imagine being gangbanged by a group of women as just having their naked bodies all over mine. They are jerking me, teasing me, rubbing me, fondling, kissing, sucking, etc. it’s all about me and my pleasure.

If I were to join a group of guys banging a woman, it would be about her pleasure. Massaging, fingering, fucking, kissing, rubbing our cocks all over and inside her, etc.

Total debauchery. Sexual stimulation and a form of orgasm denial until it’s time.

 

[Mei5ter]

So now the questions becomes, is it a gangbang if it’s a bunch of women on a male in the center of it all.

I say YES! Mainly because of the original pic posted. Obviously, we are not capable of giving sexual satisfaction to a group of women. Some women would argue we can’t give it to a single woman!

The best number of women for a guy is 4, one on the dick, one on your face and one on each hand. Possibly 5 if she can get off using a strap on on your butt. However, due to the limitations of chewing bubblegum and walking, we obviously aren’t going to give them much in the way of oral, vaginal and fingering because our brain can’t focus on all of those things at once.

But, to me, a gangbang is, or should be, about the person in the center and not the group. I imagine being gangbanged by a group of women as just having their naked bodies all over mine. They are jerking me, teasing me, rubbing me, fondling, kissing, sucking, etc. it’s all about me and my pleasure.

If I were to join a group of guys banging a woman, it would be about her pleasure. Massaging, fingering, fucking, kissing, rubbing our cocks all over and inside her, etc.

Total debauchery. Sexual stimulation and a form of orgasm denial until it’s time.

Ah, now when you put it that way, I can see the appeal more.

When I think of gangbangs, which I don't often do, I tend to think of a woman having sex with lots of men, so that men can get off watching a woman having sex with multiple men. I've never really got the sense that her pleasure has come into it, beyond the fact that those men find it hotter if she appears to be enjoying it.

What you're describing feels like a different kind of dynamic to me - though I can get overly literal on definitions and this may not be the time for Venn diagrams.

I'm still not sure it's ever going to be an all-time fantasy for me, but the appeal of four or five people focusing solely on one person's pleasure is pretty obvious. I know lots of people love the liberation amd bliss of just being able to fuck, and feel, and cum, and that can one of the best ways to reset a racing and overthinking brain. I can see how lots of people would love to be so overwhelmed with pleasure that they can't think, and can only feel. I think it's just that while I'm definitely not a control freak in any sense whatsoever, I'd be fighting my primal urge to create order from this sexual chaos, because thinking is the way I know I'm not dead yet and I don't want to stop. Does that even make the slightest sense? I can see, objectively, that five cheerleaders focusing on my sexual pleasure ought to be five times as good as one cheerleader doing the same. But when it's just my one person, and I only have her to focus on, somehow my pleasure and feelings don't have to be shared and divided and fragmented and lessened.

Just me, I guess.

 

[Wand3rlust]

Would you like to Bang my Gang?

Do you fantasize about taking part in a gangbang?

Being the central focus? Yes.

Is it one of those fantasies best left a fantasy? Why?

Yes. I don’t think I’m confident enough to participate, and in my head, I’d imagine it WAY better than any reality…

Is being the center of a gangbang, for you, about being the focus of pleasure, being used like the town bicycle, a total breakdown of all social taboos, or just the feeling of so many bodies on yours?

It’d have to be me being the focus and also just the feel of so much skin, so many hands, mouths, tongues, breasts, cocks…

What is the appeal of being part of a gangbang if you’re the many and not “the one”? How does being one of many give you pleasure? (This isn’t worded well)

I’m not selfless enough for this, I want to be the focus and I want ALL the credit.

How many guys could you take at once, how many women, or how many of both?

4 - 5, no more than 7. *ahem*

Is being out of control part of the thrill of a gangbang?

I wouldn’t know.

Aside from the pic above, gangbangs seem generally geared toward the woman as the focus, what would a male centered gangbang look like in your mind?

The guy restrained, and teased to fuck.

Would you be an active participant, meaning sucking, thrusting, jerking and swallowing, or a passive participant, meaning lying, writhing and moaning?

Both.

What would you like to know about gangbangs?

When’s the next one, and where’s my invite?

 

[Endless_Night]

But, to me, a gangbang is, or should be, about the person in the center and not the group.

Ah. This throws things in a different light.

When I think of gangbangs, which I don't often do, I tend to think of a woman having sex with lots of men, so that men can get off watching a woman having sex with multiple men. I've never really got the sense that her pleasure has come into it, beyond the fact that those men find it hotter if she appears to be enjoying it.

This^.

My perception of a gangbang is that it is about the group's pleasure, not about the woman's (or man's). She is just there to be used. Or even forcibly raped. What you're describing seems more like . . . I'm not really sure what. A harembang? Is that a thing?

Looking at definitions, they seem to cite both. Consensual and nonconsensual. It feels like there should be a definitive line between the two.

Consensual is certainly more appealing, but I still don't really see the attraction. While my arousal and desire is wrapped up in power exchange, it's the emotional intensity in a one-on-one that does if for me. Diluting that among a group seems less that ideal.

I'm with @Mei5ter on this one.

 

[Apisto42]

What you're describing feels like a different kind of dynamic to me - though I can get overly literal on definitions and this may not be the time for Venn diagrams.

It’s always time for a Venn diagram.

And maybe a color coded spreadsheet.