As North Korea have admitted to trying to build an atomic bomb...

Playing Poker With Korea
Jack Wheeler
Freedom Research Foundation
Monday, Dec. 30, 2002



Poker Beats Chess


One of the meta-reasons America won the Cold War is that Russians play chess, while Americans play poker.


Chess demands great skill and intelligence, particularly at developing complex long-range strategies and anticipating your opponent's moves. But it bears little resemblance to life in the real world. It is completely static and open. Nothing is hidden.

Poker is very different. You have to guess what your opponent has and the extent to which he is bluffing. In business, in politics, in life in general, the folks who know how to play poker will almost always fare better than those who know how to play chess.


Ronald Reagan never played chess with Mikhail Gorbachev. He played political poker. At the 1986 Reykjavik summit, Reagan bluntly told Gorbachev he was going to build and deploy a space-based missile defense (SDI). Then came the clincher.

"Mikhail," he said, looking the Soviet leader in the eye, "we both know that America can afford to do this, and the Soviet Union cannot. There is no way you can compete with us in military spending. So you are going to lose."


Gorbachev did not know if the U.S. could actually create a workable missile defense in space. But he did know it could afford to do so, while he could not. So he didn't call for Reagan's cards. He, and thus the Soviet Union, folded their own. In the real world, good poker beats good chess every time.


One of the great geopolitical puzzles of our day is why America has been outplayed at poker by a collection of primitive Stalinists in North Korea. The guys in Pyongyang are the best experts in the world at military bluffing and nuclear blackmail. They easily took Clinton to the cleaners.


Now they have decided to raise the ante against his successor. This may prove to be a fatal miscalculation. No one plays better poker than a Texan, especially one so smart and ruthless as GW.


A good poker player always looks for "tells" in his opponents, unintended clues and tip-offs in their demeanor. GW has undoubtedly noticed that Pyongyang has created a huge nuclear crisis at the precise time when it should have done the opposite: just when South Korea is experiencing such a spasm of anti-American resentment that it elected a new president pledged to appease North Korea.


Such a blatant "tell" informs GW that Pyongyang is holding a weak hand and is playing it badly out of hand-shaking desperation. Given such a "tell," a good poker player knows it's time to go for the jugular. In examining his options, GW may decide the best way to go for Pyongyang's jugular is with a spear.


Spearing Yongbyon


North Korea's claim that its Yongbyon five-megawatt nuclear reactor's purpose is to produce electricity is laughable. Five megawatts can light up little more than a good-size trailer park. The only possible purpose for such a graphite-type reactor is to convert uranium into weapons-grade Plutonium 239.


Reactivating the Yongbyon reactor can only mean North Korea intends to produce nuclear bombs. And this leaves GW with only one choice: The reactor must be physically destroyed.


Blowing it up like the Israelis blew up Saddam Hussein's Osirak reactor in 1981 (with bombs dropped by F-16s) is obviously not the best way – far too public, releasing a media firestorm. Far better to destroy it quietly, safely, stealthily and mysteriously.


With a spear. A steel rod 40 feet long and 4 inches in diameter, fin-stabilized, with a needle-sharp tungsten-carbide tip, equipped with a small JDAM guidance package including a GPS. It is non-explosive; there is no warhead.

You've heard of smart bombs. This is a smart spear.


You take a half-dozen of these Smart Spears up in a high-altitude bomber, like a B2 or B52, and drop them over Yongbyon at 50,000 or 60,000 feet. The Smart Spears have such a big sectional density that it will be like a vacuum drop – with no wind resistance, they will be going faster than the speed of sound when they hit their target.


Going so fast and with almost no radar signature, the GPS-guided Smart Spears will punch through the Yongbyon reactor and keep right on going, burying themselves in the earth several hundred feet deep. The North Koreans won't know what happened, and all there will be is some holes in the ground – plus a melted-down reactor.


The time to do this is just after the fuel rods have been inserted into the reactivated reactor and have started to burn. It will take up to three months for the uranium in the rods to be converted to plutonium-239. The fuel rods lie inside water-cooled pipes placed in graphite blocks. If holes are punched through the reactor core, rupturing the pipes, the uranium fuel rods – no longer being cooled with the water drained out – will catch on fire and the entire reactor will melt down.


While much of the radioactive contents and fission fragments will drain down the holes in the reactor floor made by the Smart Spears, some radiation will be released into the atmosphere through the holes punched in the roof. The longer the rods have been burning in the reactor, the more radiation will be released. The earlier the Smart Spears are dropped, the less radiation release.

It would also be psychologically more effective if Yonbyon is taken out within days of its going critical.


There would be no dramatic World War II-type bombing raid by carrier-launched fighter jets. There would be no large radiation leaks. There would be no announcement by the U.S. government before or after, admitting it had done anything. The North Koreans would be unable to produce any evidence of U.S. culpability (unless they want to dig down several hundred feet underneath the Yongbyon complex, which would take them a while anyway). It would just look like there was an unfortunate "accident," about which GW would be silent.


Our Turn to Up the Ante


Now it would be GW's turn to up the ante. He could inform Pyongyang that unless it begins a full disarmament process, he is prepared to initiate the following:


Instruct U.S. Trade Representative Bob Zoellick and Secretary of State Colin Powell to inform every country that does business with North Korea – including Russia, France, Japan and especially China – that they must choose between doing business with it or America.

For any country continuing to trade with North Korea – and again, especially China, which has recently sold 20 tons of tributyl phosphate (TBP, a chemical used for extracting plutonium from uranium fuel rods) to North Korea – every port in America will be closed to the importation of every product from that country. (It is worth noting that such a total trade embargo would soon cause the collapse of China's economy.)


Instruct the Pentagon to have one B2 bomber carrying 16 2,000-pound smart bombs with conventional high-explosive warheads blow up the Yongbyon Cooling Pond. This contains some 8,000 spent fuel rods, created before Yongbyon was mothballed in 1994, from which enough plutonium-239 can now be extracted for several nuclear bombs using the Chinese TBP. The destruction of the cooling pond would cause a radiation release in the atmosphere of less than one-tenth of 1 percent of Chernobyl's.


Further instruct the Pentagon to be prepared to incapacitate the entire firing line of rocket launchers and artillery cannons, of which there are several thousand, and annihilate the entire force of close to a million North Korean soldiers clustered along the DMZ (demilitarized zone) border with enhanced radiation weapons, either produced by us or borrowed from the Israelis, who already have hundreds.


ERWs – enhanced radiation weapons, or "neutron bombs" – are extremely localized. They produce minimal heat and blast, but emit a form of nuclear radiation that is intensely powerful over a very short range that is also very short-lived. The ERW's massive wave of neutron and gamma radiation will penetrate armor, hardened bunkers and several feet of earth within a radius of a thousand yards. Within this radius, every living thing will be quickly killed.


The danger rapidly decreases beyond a thousand yards, dropping to virtually zero after 2,000 yards. The radiation dissipates within 24 to 48 hours. One single B2 with 16 JDAM-guided ERWs will sterilize 24 kilometers of the North Korean front line, and less than a dozen will wipe out the entire line of North Korean forces and batteries along the DMZ – with no collateral damage to South Korean population centers such as nearby Seoul threatened by these forces and batteries just a few miles away.


Kim Jong-il and his gang should know full well that George Bush can't be bluffed, bullied and blackmailed like Bill Clinton. Once GW raises the ante to this level, they will realize they are in a poker game they are going to lose.


Saving Korean Face


Yet it is very unwise to give a dangerous and deranged enemy no hope of escape. Once Yongbyon melts down in a mysterious accident and GW conveys to Kim Jong-il in a fully confidential manner with no media leaks what he is next prepared to order, he can then offer Pyongyang a way to save face.


Cloaked in diplomatic euphemisms, GW could say to Kim:


"Look, my opinion is that you are human garbage and that the people of North Korea would be infinitely better off if you were dead. However, my job is not to get rid of you. My job is to protect my country and the lives of the 37,000 American soldiers in South Korea. Thus my job, as far as you are concerned, is to prevent you and your government from (1) being a threat to South Korea, and (2) selling weapons and technology to countries and groups that could be or are a threat to us.


"So here's the deal. You will dismantle your entire offensive military capacities – nuclear, biochemical, conventional. You keep only what you need – and we'll be the judge of that – for defense. You will submit to a rigorous WMD inspection program. You will sign a peace treaty with South Korea. You will engage in no military transfers or sales with any foreign company or country. In short, you will stop being a threat to us or anyone else. In exchange, you get to stay in power.


"We both know that's all you really care about – staying in power. You would rather have millions of your fellow countrymen starve to death than relinquish your power. Frankly, if they would rather starve than rebel against you, that's their business (just like it's the business of the people of, say, Zimbabwe regarding Robert Mugabe).


"I am making this offer to you because I think you are less of a danger than Saddam Hussein. There is no doubt whatever that if Saddam remains in power, he will build and disseminate weapons of mass destruction throughout the world. We cannot simply disarm him; we have to remove him. I think simply disarming you will be sufficient. But if it is not, believe me, Kim, I will take you out in a New York second.


"Has it ever occurred to you how impossibly vulnerable you have made yourself, placing the majority of your pathologically large army in one narrow line along the DMZ? Do you think I care any more about annihilating your million soldiers along the DMZ than Truman did about the inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? I will fry every last one of them if that's what it takes to eliminate your threat to the world. So – do we have a deal?"


That said, there remains another Korea to play poker with. With the folks in the south, the ante is straightforward. GW simply explains to incoming president Roh Moo-hyun that he no longer wants 37,000 American soldiers to be held as Korean hostages. So Mr. Roh is to cooperate with his program of disarming the North, and then all those American soldiers who annoy him and so many other South Koreans can come back home.


For far too long, Koreans in both Seoul and Pyongyang have been playing with America as if they held the high cards. They do not. The aces are in our hands. It is time for GW to use them and play to win.


Jack Wheeler is President of the Freedom Research Foundation.



©Copyright 2002 Dr. Jack Wheeler and the Freedom Research Foundation.
 
Eating Tree Bark
John LeBoutillier
Monday, Dec. 30, 2002


Most of the media pundits and 'talking heads' have missed the basic, underlying point behind North Korea's recent actions: They are broke!

The failed Communist North Korean economic system is a hard-line, traditional totalitarian, communist system – with almost all national assets devoted to a huge military force.

In such a system the leaders – in this case first the nation's founder, the brutal Kim Il Sung, and now his puny degenerate son, Kim Jong-il – run everything with an iron fist. They couldn't care less about 'public opinion.' Nor do they fear the voters' wrath in the next election – because there are no elections.

No, in countries like this, mere survival is the goal of 90 percent of the people; the other 10 percent – the 'Communist Party' – live high off the hog. Kim Jong-il's favorite activities are importing Scandinavian prostitutes for his personal pleasure and drinking expensive Scotch whiskey.

Meanwhile, North Korea has resorted to cooking tree bark to feed the masses.

Why is North Korea now throwing out U.N. inspectors and re-starting its nuclear reactor?

To extract dollars from the United States! Period!

They look at their top two allies – Russia and Red China – and they see renewed trade with the U.S. and targeted economic assistance from U.S.-directed programs (World Bank and IMF) and they want a share. But they haven't been able to get any because they refuse to bend their economic system – and they want to keep their nation as closed as possible because they fear social instability.

If you have ever been to South Korea you can see free enterprise thriving – just miles from a poor and dilapidated North Korea. That contrast says it all about the two competing economic systems. Unless and until Pyongyang changes its basic thinking, it will fall farther and farther behind.

Meanwhile, North Korea sees its ally in the so-called 'Axis of Evil' – Iraq – getting much world attention. Plus, despite the ongoing U.N. embargo, Iraq is awash in black market cash. And, of course, it has a huge oil reserve – which many believe is the real reason Bush is targeting Baghdad's regime.

SO, Kim Jong-il is playing the one and only card his barren nation has: the nuclear card. He is like a petulant child screaming out to get attention. And it drives him crazy when Uncle Sam ignores him.

The problem here for the Bush administration is this: Kim Jong-il is very likely to step up his petulance by selling a nuke to Osama or Libya or Syria – just the way he recently sold Scuds to Yemen. That way he gets a quick infusion of cash – and the blame for using the nuke goes to some Islamic group.

We should do one of two things: a) Surgically bomb and 'take out' the nuclear reactor in North Korea, or b) quietly try to 'buy off' the entire North Korean leadership with personal bribes, Swiss bank accounts and whatever it takes to defuse a situation that could kill literally millions of people.

We should also try to be consistent in international affairs. Why is Iraq – without nuclear weapons– more of a threat than North Korea, which has several nukes already and the capability to make more?

Prediction: The early part of the New Year 2003 is going to be filled with surprises. Team Bush's obsession with Iraq may be distracting it from other imminent crises.
 
Revisionist Reality Check
Geoff Metcalf
Tuesday, Dec. 31, 2002
Careful What You Ask For

Memories of the past are not memories of facts but memories of your imaginings of the facts. – Philip Roth
I was hosting a talk radio program in Dallas recently and received one of those classic smarmy liberal calls seeking to shift the blame for American complicity with North Korea away from the Clinton administration to ANY Republican.

The caller asked in those 'reasonable' questioning tones if perhaps we should have the 'full story' of how the U.S. enabled North Korea to reach the flashpoint we currently face. The suggestion/intimation/rhetorical question was, "Who 'really' allowed the North Koreans to become a potential nuclear threat?" She asked, "What if Bush senior or Reagan enabled Pyongyang?" This is typical liberal obfuscation. When confronted with facts that contradict their preconceived opinion or prejudice they seek to either ignore the facts or manufacture revisionist fiction.

And the Texas liberal is not the Lone Ranger. Subsequent to our exchange, George Stephanopoulos took a knife to a gunfight with Secretary of State Colin Powell on ABC. Boy George (relying on a Sen. John Kerry quote) tried to suggest the North Korea problem was created by the Bush administration.

Powell eviscerated the claim: "The fact of the matter is that this program was not started during the Bush administration. It was started during the previous administration. Back in 1998 and 1999, the intelligence shows clearly that North Korea had embarked on a program of enriching uranium. And so, we inherited this problem."

Before my Texas program was over (and with a little help from my friends) I was able to disavow listeners who took the bait of the liberal obfuscator. What was cool was that we were able to offer documentation from the chronically liberal news source CNN. http://asia.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/12/22/nkorea.nuclear.timeline.reut/

Notwithstanding protestations to the contrary, the FACTS demonstrate that it was NOT Reagan or Bush but ONLY Bill Clinton who orchestrated North Korea into its current position of threat.

CNN offers a very nice "TIMELINE: North Korea's nuclear history" from 1985 to the present.

In December 1985 North Korea joined the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). However, their participation had strings attached. They required any agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) contingent on removal of U.S. nuclear weapons from South Korea.

It was President George Bush (the elder) who ordered withdrawal of all U.S. tactical nuclear weapons deployed abroad, including about 100 based in South Korea, in September 1991.

As a result of that action, in December North and South Korea signed the South-North Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. In it they pledged not to test, produce, receive, store, deploy or use nuclear weapons. They also agree to mutual inspections. But obviously, they lied!

Just before the '92 elections in the U.S., IAEA inspectors discovered some hinkiness in North Korea's initial report on its nuclear program and asked for clarification on the amount of reprocessed plutonium.

Very early in Clinton's first term, the IAEA demanded special inspections of two nuclear waste storage sites. It claimed evidence that North Korea had been cheating on its commitments. North Korea flat-out refused. In March, with heat for special inspections, North Korea said it intended to withdraw from the NPT in 90 days.

After one full year of North Korea playing the IAEA and the Clinton administration, the CIA announced that North Korea might have produced one or two nuclear weapons. Hell-o?

When North Korea announced its withdrawal from the IAEA (June 1994), former (failed) U.S. president Jimmy Carter cut a deal with North Korea in which the North confirmed its willingness to freeze its nuclear arms program and resume talks with the United States. So they agreed to do what they agreed to do nine years earlier and had not.

Then in October 1994 the United States and North Korea concluded months of haggling and eventually adopted the 'Agreed Framework' in Geneva.

That was when North Korea presumably agreed to freeze and eventually eliminate its nuclear facilities and to allow IAEA special inspections.

But there was a 'quo' to the 'quid'. In exchange for agreeing to what it already had agreed to, Pyongyang scored two light-water reactors and annual shipments of heavy fuel oil.

With over a year left in President Clinton's term, the Advisory Group warned that the deal that was 'supposed' to derail Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program had instead backfired.

The Advisory Group warned that the provision of two light-water reactors provided North Korea with the capacity to produce enough fissile material for nearly 100 nuclear bombs ANNUALLY.
And the Clinton administration didn't do 'Jack'.

So, despite the revisionist dissembling of ABC's diminutive propagandist and doubt-sowing callers to radio talk shows, the FACTS are that the North Korean mess is yet another product of Bill Clinton. It also personifies the axiom that there ARE consequences to things we do and don't do.
 
Back
Top