a question for american men

seriously, do you honestly believe a woman's interest in you is directly proportional to the size of your wallet?

(not judging, just doing a little statistical investigation)

Low quality women will look for a man with a big wallet.

High quality women will look for a man with good personality.

It's just as true in this country, as it is in any other.



Also, guys who always fall back on this excuse, generally do it because they don't have a big wallet, or a good personality.

And to the grumpy men out there:
There's also that whole concept of "individuality", you know, in that you take each woman as an individual... and not a conglomerate of your bad experiences with women. I know it's a novel idea.
 
seriously, do you honestly believe a woman's interest in you is directly proportional to the size of your wallet?

(not judging, just doing a little statistical investigation)

Yeah, I do.....but, its innate, caveman stuff, like Fight or Flight....

don't believe reality by the movies you watch. Maid of Manhattan or Pretty Woman, are movies....
 
$ gets them in, the cock makes them stay....:cool:

All jokes aside, there is a pretty large segment of woman only interested in the size of the wallet. These woman have their place in my observation. In my industry, being successful also means traveling two weeks a month, always being on the phone, lots of entertaining and dinner meetings, emails 24-7.

I am lucky, I travel 50% less than the other partners in my firm. My wife would never accept me being away as much as they are. Their wife's accept it, and my guess is it is because the money. It takes a certain type of woman to accept that type of marriage, and in most cases $ is their motivation. I'm not saying there is not love, but it is a different kind of love.
 
$ gets them in, the cock makes them stay....:cool:

All jokes aside, there is a pretty large segment of woman only interested in the size of the wallet. These woman have their place in my observation. In my industry, being successful also means traveling two weeks a month, always being on the phone, lots of entertaining and dinner meetings, emails 24-7.

I am lucky, I travel 50% less than the other partners in my firm. My wife would never accept me being away as much as they are. Their wife's accept it, and my guess is it is because the money. It takes a certain type of woman to accept that type of marriage, and in most cases $ is their motivation. I'm not saying there is not love, but it is a different kind of love.

Its not the wallet and the size, its that most woman want to be secure, or made to feel secure. Its human nature. That said, most women don't want to be alone, or feel alone, can't blame them. Quite the dilemma
 
Interesting thread.

I'd like to turn the question around a bit (too lazy to start another thread, plus I'm on too many ignore lists to get a good cross-section):

Women, is an unemployed man an automatic disqualifier or a significant negative when assessing relationship potential?

(cue my detractors and their "Rob doesn't have no job!" jibba-jabba).
 
Interesting thread.

I'd like to turn the question around a bit (too lazy to start another thread, plus I'm on too many ignore lists to get a good cross-section):

Women, is an unemployed man an automatic disqualifier or a significant negative when assessing relationship potential?

(cue my detractors and their "Rob doesn't have no job!" jibba-jabba).

Not for me, no.
 
Interesting thread.

I'd like to turn the question around a bit (too lazy to start another thread, plus I'm on too many ignore lists to get a good cross-section):

Women, is an unemployed man an automatic disqualifier or a significant negative when assessing relationship potential?

(cue my detractors and their "Rob doesn't have no job!" jibba-jabba).

hasn't been an issue so far.

though, obviously, i see a difference between those who can't work (for health reasons, etc), those who are unable to find work and those who just don't want to work.
 
I think it is a combination of factors...which ones are more important varies by each woman.
 
I love how the "manly" men in here get to decide how women think. Interesting.

What women want isnt complicated to figger out. Cash, companionship, children, cock, chattel, and a casa. Did I forget CONTROL!
 
I think it is a combination of factors...which ones are more important varies by each woman.

Females are always UP for a starter guy but theyre impatient for the changes that make him a better catch.
 
if cash was important i wouldn't have given my ex the boot.

i'm quite content in relative poverty.
 
I will suck a rich man’s dick, but love a poor man’s dick better because he needs it more.
 
seriously, do you honestly believe a woman's interest in you is directly proportional to the size of your wallet?

(not judging, just doing a little statistical investigation)

Seriously, do you honestly believe that this question isn't phrased in a very judgemental way?
 
Depends on the woman.

I live in the very county of the U.S. most-often associated with the type of woman whose interest would be directed as such, and I can tell you that it's frequently true here. The women who are usually "hardcore" about it, i.e. adamant that their significant other be wealthy, usually come off as fucked in the head if you have any in-depth conversation with them.
 
Depends on the woman.

I live in the very county of the U.S. most-often associated with the type of woman whose interest would be directed as such, and I can tell you that it's frequently true here. The women who are usually "hardcore" about it, i.e. adamant that their significant other be wealthy, usually come off as fucked in the head if you have any in-depth conversation with them.

nice sentence structure....
 
Back
Top