Why and how is abortion a state's rights issue?

[ll74]

No, I haven't, I've triggered the shit out of a white knight though. You got a crush on her or something? Sad...

They are irrelevant. What does CU a 1A case have to do with abortion and 10A??? Nothing.

She's deflecting, trying to pretend 10A isn't there or doesn't say what it very clearly says.

You continue to blame others when being called out for your stupidity. It's entertaining. You mentioned the 10a yet failed to refute her arguments about that assertion and instead just dismissed them because it was above your reading level.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Nice link to a leftist propaganda site.

I await your citation to back up your previous claims.

It’s been provided. Perhaps you’ll have better luck the next time you make a bad argument.

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

Bodily autonomy is not a right? So then the government can come for your blood and tissues. To preserve the life of another.

Not anywhere in the Constitution or under federal law.

If you're suspected of a crime they can already in most circumstances. States can mandate experimental vaccines,

I don't see why they couldn't come take a blood/tissue sample for "national security" reasons...I mean after all, if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about right??

I think bodily autonomy should be a right that is protected, but it's not.

Personally I'm all the way pro-abortion for women, under the condition that men also get to choose if they want to be a father or not via legal/financial abortion.

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

You continue to blame others when being called out for your stupidity. It's entertaining. You mentioned the 10a yet failed to refute her arguments about that assertion and instead just dismissed them because it was above your reading level.

I didn't blame anyone for anything.

They didn't make any arguments. They deflected to 1A and 4A cases that have nothing to do with 10A or my reading level thus their dismissal.

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

It’s been provided. Perhaps you’ll have better luck the next time you make a bad argument.

No a link was provided. You didn't actually cite anything thought, probably because there isn't anything in that link that backs you up.

 

[adrina]

Not anywhere in the Constitution or under federal law.

If you're suspected of a crime they can already in most circumstances. States can mandate experimental vaccines,

I don't see why they couldn't come take a blood/tissue sample for "national security" reasons...I mean after all, if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about right??

I think bodily autonomy should be a right that is protected, but it's not.

Personally I'm all the way pro-abortion for women, under the condition that men also get to choose if they want to be a father or not via legal/financial abortion.

So then why can't the government harvest your organs and compel blood donation without your consent?

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

So then why can't the government harvest your organs and compel blood donation without your consent?

Coercion pretty explicitly means you're not donating.

Coercion and force as when they hold you down and take blood when suspected of a crime, happens every day in the USA.

As for harvesting your organs, that would arguably very much violate the eighth amendment. But the progressives in China are big on that one so there is hope for Democrats to get the same power one day.

 

[jaF0]

Nice link to a leftist propaganda site.

I await your citation to back up your previous claims.

Gotta be BotFlyToi.

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

Because the highest court in the land says so.

/thread

Funny how that's all the justification needed when the court rules the way they like.

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

Gotta be BotFlyToi.

How am I a tropical parasite because spiderman has the citation skills of a house cat?

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

I am pro abortion. But this thread, like all Adrina threads, is retarded.

100%, the more lefties chopping their kids up the better, fuck I think they should be able to waste their crotch trophies till age 10. It's the only way to be sure!!

She seems pretty off her rocker "10A isn't valid and doesn't protect states rights because states aren't people!!" and then her obsession over unrelated 1A and 4A cases... as if they have anything to do with abortion or 10A.

She seems mad about Roe getting called out finally for the weak legal activism that it was and unable to hold the Democrats at all responsible being so slimy they won't do anything to protect the right to abortion, even though they absolutely can and have bipartisan support to do so RIGHT NOW.

Is the place a Tumblr refuge??

 

[jomar]

In Roe the fundamental constitutional right to have an abortion was based on 14A by SCOTUS. Then 50 years later the current SCOTUS, 3 of whom said Roe was settled law during their recentish confirmation hearings, decided it wasn’t a constitutional right in the Dobbs ruling.

I suppose a case for judicial activism can be made for both rulings. But since we’re back to underground abortions, women are going to die.

As an aside, Roe had the baby who, now an adult and a mother herself, released a statement speaking out against the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe, which is interesting.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

You would have to read up on the citizens united decision for those details.

You could have just said “ she seems pretty off her rocker”.

Mad cow disease.

Understatement.

 

[ll74]

I didn't blame anyone for anything.

They didn't make any arguments. They deflected to 1A and 4A cases that have nothing to do with 10A or my reading level thus their dismissal.

Lol...keep working this angle. It's fun.

 

[Dribble]

Yes, rights.

But abortion is not a right. Back to needing actual legislation or even better an amendment to protect it as such.

Equal health care opportunities are a right. Just as equal educational opportunities. Long long long history of Court Cases backing this up.

Now...like I said...you don't want equal opportunities...cool. Let the majority of the GDP go its own way as progressive States leave. We will pay Republicans to leave. We will pay to have the best workers and companies to employ them move to the Progressive States

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

Lol...keep working this angle. It's fun.

Stumped you pretty well.

 

[ll74]

Stumped you pretty well.

Yes, I get that you believe that

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

Equal health care opportunities are a right. Just as equal educational opportunities. Long long long history of Court Cases backing this up.

Now...like I said...you don't want equal opportunities...cool. Let the majority of the GDP go its own way as progressive States leave. We will pay Republicans to leave. We will pay to have the best workers and companies to employ them move to the Progressive States

Yes, those OPPORTUNITIES (not the services themselves) are a right.

No I do want equal opportunities. It's the equal outcomes that 'progressive" leftist promote that I want nothing to do with.

Progressive states like CA and NY could do that now, but they won't and are hemorrhaging their workers and companies to more moderate if not red places at record rates while crime, poverty and homelessness skyrocket. So best of luck to them with that.

What's any of this got to do with 10A protecting a states right to regulate that which the feds do not??

 

[ll74]

What's any of this got to do with 10A protecting a states right to regulate that which the feds do not??

Obtuse as shit.

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

Yes, I get that you believe that

It's a fact. Neither citizens united nor the recent decisions on Qualified Immunity had nothing to do with 10A or abortion.

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

Obtuse as shit.

How so? Please try to make the connection.

 

[ll74]

It's a fact. Neither citizens united nor the recent decisions on Qualified Immunity had nothing to do with 10A or abortion.

You don't understand her argument well enough to refute it even though that's what you believe you e done.

Sorry. It's definitely fun to watch you try.

 

[AsmodeusPrime]

Not really. You've not demonstrated at all why abortion is a state's right issue when it comes to regulation. No one outside of your choir has been convinced of your perspective. You've convinced no one but those who already believe as you do.

Is that success?

Because there isn't federal regulation or amendment taking the power from the states, and the letter of the law point blank as explicitly as it gets says that means the authority to regulate is with the states.

You can ignore 10A all you like, it's not going away.

Those are the facts. Your belief is not required.

 

[ll74]

How so? Please try to make the connection.

She has and so have I.

 

[ll74]

Because there isn't federal regulation or amendment taking the power from the states, and the letter of the law point blank as explicitly as it gets says that means the authority to regulate is with the states.

You can ignore 10A all you like, it's not going away.

Those are the facts. Your belief is not required.

My god you're such a dumbass.