Why Did Bill Clinton And Loretta Lynch Meet On Her Airplane In Phoenix This Week?

[phrodeau]

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/14/fbis-probe-of-clinton-email-server-is-a-criminal-investigation-judge-says/

The judge has been watching too much Fox News.

 

[snugglestruggle]

The judge has been watching too much Fox News.

Or You've been smoking some pipe weed from down Bywater way.

 

[miles]

Or You've been smoking some pipe weed from down Bywater way.

Weed would probably make him smarter.

 

[miles]

The judge has been watching too much Fox News.

He's a black man appointed by Bill Clinton...must be on of those escapees from the liberal plantation.

You aren't doing too well in this thread, are you?

 

[phrodeau]

And what does that have to do with the OP?

 

[miles]

And what does that have to do with the OP?

Time for you to take a Lit break.

 

[Knot Again]

Dem Senator: Lynch meeting “sends the wrong signal”


http://hotair.com/archives/2016/06/30/dem-senator-lynch-meeting-sends-the-wrong-signal/

 

[phrodeau]

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-judge-investigation-224314#ixzz4D6K7Rhck

A former information technology aide to Hillary Clinton received immunity from the Justice Department in connection with a criminal investigation, a federal judge confirmed Tuesday.

Bryan Pagliano, a computer expert who worked at the State Department while Clinton was secretary of state and was also paid privately by her, was previously reported to have received immunity in connection with statements he gave to the FBI about Clinton's private server set-up.

However, there had been no explicit confirmation that the investigation—which Clinton has repeatedly referred to as a "security review"—is actually a criminal probe.

 

[miles]

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-judge-investigation-224314#ixzz4D6K7Rhck

You just can't control yourself, can you?

Why don't you post this week's baseball scores and the standings in each division. They're just as relevant to the conversation as the horse shit you keep shoveling.

Are you related to Spidey?

 

[Colonel Hogan]

The judge has been watching too much Fox News.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-judge-investigation-224314#ixzz4D6K7Rhck

A former information technology aide to Hillary Clinton received immunity from the Justice Department in connection with a criminal investigation, a federal judge confirmed Tuesday.

Bryan Pagliano, a computer expert who worked at the State Department while Clinton was secretary of state and was also paid privately by her, was previously reported to have received immunity in connection with statements he gave to the FBI about Clinton's private server set-up.

However, there had been no explicit confirmation that the investigation—which Clinton has repeatedly referred to as a "security review"—is actually a criminal probe.

The judge understands the law, and apparently you don't. Pagliano was given "use immunity." Had there been not at LEAST a suspicion of criminal activity there would have been no reason not to give him transactional immunity. Use immunity only protects him from prosecution based solely on the testimony he gives. It does NOT protect him from prosecution based on other independently produced evidence. Here's the difference as explained by the DoJ itself:

U.S. Attorneys » Resources » U.S. Attorneys' Manual » Criminal Resource Manual » CRM 500-999 » Criminal Resource Manual 701-799
717. Transactional Immunity Distinguished

Title 18 U.S.C. § 6002 provides use immunity instead of transactional immunity. The difference between transactional and use immunity is that transactional immunity protects the witness from prosecution for the offense or offenses involved, whereas use immunity only protects the witness against the government's use of his or her immunized testimony in a prosecution of the witness -- except in a subsequent prosecution for perjury or giving a false statement.

https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-717-transactional-immunity-distinguished

You don't typically give anyone immunity of any kind but for the purpose of gathering evidence for a potential criminal prosecution. The taking of that immunized deposition alone pretty much constitutes a criminal investigation on its face. And the fact that he was only given use immunity indicates the increased belief on the part of the grantor of immunity that not only has a crime taken place, but that the immunized witness is not about to get a TOTAL PASS for his part in that crime if independent evidence can establish his guilt.

 

[Knot Again]

Judicial Watch Asks Justice Inspector General to Investigate Loretta Lynch-Bill Clinton Meeting


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...vestigate-loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-meeting/

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Whatever Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch chose to talk about, it is none of your beeswax. Get it now?

The Foundation is under investigation, his wife is under investigation and Lynch is in charge of the investigators.

It is the people's business. If they just wanted to banter, they could have pulled a reporter or two in...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You seem thoroughly convinced that Hillary is under a criminal investigation, and she is not.

Sounds liks a straw man to me.

Yes she is. The FBI has already confirmed this.

 

[miles]

Yes she is. The FBI has already confirmed this.

Fro is doing a superb imitation of Spidey and Sean Renaud.

 

[hashtag45]

I just noticed Busybody's new siggy.
What the hell?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

However, there had been no explicit confirmation that the investigation—which Clinton has repeatedly referred to as a "security review"—is actually a criminal probe.

This is the MSM using the talking points given to the by Hillary. The head of the FBI said, we do not do security reviews.

The Colonel is right, you should at lest think about what he posted.

The MSM trick, right now, on the meeting is that sources tell them that all the talk was just howdy-doody. Notice sources not witnesses. Now who would the sources be if not people from the Administration, the Foundation or her campaign?

Her server was set up for convenience. Turned out to be a lie.

So the next talking point was that there was nothing marked classified on it. It was a lie.

So, the next incarnation was, there wasn't any BIG C documents, another lie.

Now Huma Weiner is telling us in a deposition that it was all just to keep private stuff private...

That's a lie!

All she had to do was log into any one of many mail services and set up her free email account.

They are all involved in a conspiracy to elect a criminal to the Presidency.

Oh, and the newest cover/dodge from the State Department? They've decided to ask for another 27 months to turn over the Foundation email records...

WTF???

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I just noticed Busybody's new siggy.
What the hell?

He, and a couple of others are the reason I turned the sigline feature off...

 

[hashtag45]

He, and a couple of others are the reason I turned the sigline feature off...

Well, Zumi's screen-stretchers are annoying as hell.
But BB's are the main reason that I keep the feature on. His signatures alway make me laugh. It's like a knee-jerk reflex already, whenever I open his threads.
If he put his creativity to better use he''d be a millionaire already, I reckon.

 

[hashtag45]

He, and a couple of others are the reason I turned the sigline feature off...

Here's why I laughed:
This is how the page looked like, when I opened the thread: Busybody's posts and and siggy on top of the page, towering over all your guys' posts:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmMe86jWEAAHZ9N.jpg

 

[Knot Again]

ExCuntClinton said under OATH and threat of prosecution for PERJURY she turned over all emails

every day

we now know

that she didnt

but NOTHING will happen

TRUMP TACOZ

 

[Knot Again]

He, and a couple of others are the reason I turned the sigline feature off...

if you have SIGGYS off


the SIGGYS cum t you

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmMe86jWEAAHZ9N.jpg

 

[miles]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmMe86jWEAAHZ9N.jpg

I don't care who you are...that right there is funny.

 

[Adre]

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said. Her decision removes the possibility that a political appointee will overrule investigators in the case.

 

[miles]

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said. Her decision removes the possibility that a political appointee will overrule investigators in the case.

That's pretty bold considering the "career prosecutors" report to Loretta Lynch, as does the FBI Director.

There won't be a recommendation to prosecute her. The Obama administration is corrupt to the core.

 

[Adre]

That's pretty bold considering the "career prosecutors" report to Loretta Lynch, as does the FBI Director.

There won't be a recommendation to prosecute her. The Obama administration is corrupt to the core.

Of course you'd say that. Because you get to have it both ways, and as we know FBI directors are known liars.