Why Did Bill Clinton And Loretta Lynch Meet On Her Airplane In Phoenix This Week?

Are you surprised?

Along with denial, outright lying, deflection, attacking the source, and answering questions with another question, deflection is one of the hallmarks of liberalism. They can't support their beliefs with facts or knowledge.

They're political zombies.
 
Are you surprised?

Along with denial, outright lying, deflection, attacking the source, and answering questions with another question, deflection is one of the hallmarks of liberalism. They can't support their beliefs with facts or knowledge.

They're political zombies.
You learned all those words from someone describing you.
 
You learned all those words from someone describing you.

Damn, Fro, you killed two birds with one stone.

You deflected the OP and attacked me at the same time. Perfect!

So what do you have to say about the subject of the thread?
 
Here's miles' idea of responding to the subject of a thread.:rolleyes:

I dont know why, but I expected BETTER of you then shit like this,

and shit like you saying Gowdy was a SHIT prosecutor, when he was anything but

as someone who purports to be IN DEPENDS

you are 10000% behind the DUMOH talking points



I am sad for you
 
The tarmac summit sent a signal. It is a signal to all of the hardworking FBI agents who have the goods on Hillary.

The attorney general has made it clear what team she is on. The attorney general isn’t on the side of justice. She’s on the Democratic Party team.

This is the unspoken message from Lynch to all of the FBI agents on the case and to all the front-line lawyers at the Justice Department:

When you send your recommendation to refer Hillary’s case to the grand jury, you had better realize your burden to convince me I should sign off on a grand jury request is higher than you thought. These are my friends.
 
Damn, Fro, you killed two birds with one stone.

You deflected the OP and attacked me at the same time. Perfect!

So what do you have to say about the subject of the thread?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

So that's your answer to the question in the OP.

Did anyone say they didn't have a right to free speech? They didn't, did they? It has absolutely nothing to do with the OP, which is exactly why you brought it up.

Give yourself a big, fat zero, straw man.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So that's your answer to the question in the OP.

Did anyone say they didn't have a right to free speech? They didn't, did they? It has absolutely nothing to do with the OP, which is exactly why you brought it up.

Give yourself a big, fat zero, straw man.
Whatever Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch chose to talk about, it is none of your beeswax. Get it now?
 
Whatever Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch chose to talk about, it is none of your beeswax. Get it now?



Apparently straw man arguments are the best you can do.

It's not an issue of whose "beeswax" this is. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Lynch is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States and the lead attorney for the Department of Justice. Holding a private meeting with the spouse of someone of the same political party who is under criminal investigation by her own DOJ gives the appearance of impropriety and conflict of interest - regardless of what they talked about. It looks bad...REALLY bad...even to other Democrats.
 
Apparently straw man arguments are the best you can do.

It's not an issue of whose "beeswax" this is. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Lynch is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States and the lead attorney for the Department of Justice. Holding a private meeting with the spouse of someone of the same political party who is under criminal investigation by her own DOJ gives the appearance of impropriety and conflict of interest - regardless of what they talked about. It looks bad...REALLY bad...even to other Democrats.
You seem thoroughly convinced that Hillary is under a criminal investigation, and she is not.

Sounds liks a straw man to me.
 
You seem thoroughly convinced that Hillary is under a criminal investigation, and she is not.

Sounds liks a straw man to me.

Man, puhleeeze!!!!

What is it, a "security review?"

That aside, what does that have to do with the OP? Nothing. Absolutely nothing, just like every other post of yours in this thread.

You're hopeless.

Give yourself a double zero.
 
Whatever Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch chose to talk about, it is none of your beeswax. Get it now?

They were talking about their grandchildren, no conspiracy in the making. Umm wait, Lynch doesn't have any grandchildren. Bill was discussing Lynch's future in the NWO.
 
Back
Top