Top 7 reasons why single black men don't approach black women

Remove user from ignore listDesEsseintes
This message is hidden because DesEsseintes is on your ignore list.


I need to go, SeanR.
Got to get going + I'm also afraid that my own trolls are starting to line up in this thread.
Have a nice day.:)
 
Oh just a clarification re my current username, Bronzeage :

Under my former one (Aella) I made some unwise comments (even if I had no intent to point out to the underage thingy) so Laurel banned that username, as per forum rules.
 
Seriously, you can admit that Laurel banned you and not get banned again? I mean I'd always assumed that Laurel was just cool about the "I think this is you but I can't prove it" but FFS.
 
What's that got to do with you being a thug?
You lack the credibility to judge anyone else's character. Least of all mine.

Because honestly it's ideal in many cases to attack the poster. We've as a society come to the mistaken theory that it's bad to shoot the messenger to the point that it should never be done. At a certain point however it's the only tactical option. If the leader of ISIS came in here you wouldn't politely listen to his points on Jews and Christians and do research to prove each of his points false including a few that a probably true from a certain perspective or extraordinarily difficult to prove one way or the other. You'd just call him a bigoted moron and go on to something else.
The fact that you compare posters on the Internet to ISIS shows just how abysmally ignorant you are. And it doesn't in any way change the fact that you are a known habitual rage quitter when it comes to logical debate.
 
No. I can say I'm not among their number by any rational measure but that's not what's being discussed here.

This would be like showing up to a Trump rally and saying "Well Trump politics aside can you say there aren't any racist attitudes among certain Americans."
^^^ From the guy who says he doesn't care about rape victims.
 
I think that these Are relevant.
Because you guys are implying that LJ is a 10 on the misogyny scale (figuratively speaking).
So what sort of standard or criteria are you using?
Sean Renaud's definition of misogyny, and everyone else's on here, is the act of debunking the notion that women are morally superior to men.

Plus there's a reason why nobody ever discusses the facts that I put forth, like the OP - they cannot be refuted.

On the General Board, when you cannot refute facts, you don't concede, you attack the messenger. I post stuff here to show the world how out of touch this forum is. When I want a serious fight I go to Tumblr. Even they are smarter than this crowd. (It doesn't hurt that I have 1400 followers there, easily an order of magnitude more people than detractors that I have here.)
 
You cozy up to lovecraft all the time. Despite his white trashy comments. Like hssh said you ain't in a position to throw stones little shit.

Proof? You have none. You're a liar.

Want examples of where I've nailed him? Go ahead, ask - I'll provide them. Embarrass yourself further. :cool:
 
Proof? You have none. You're a liar.

Want examples of where I've nailed him? Go ahead, ask - I'll provide them. Embarrass yourself further. :cool:
You're giving his racist bullshit a free pass right here.

Your lying ass has been busted right here, bitch.
 
You're giving his racist bullshit a free pass right here.

What are you talking about? Where have I given him a pass in this thread?

If I post ad nauseam that he's a racist jerk, like I did with Cade, will you make a subsequent thread supporting him, like you did with Cade? Just 'cause I got under your skin once upon a time?

lol, you're fun; no wonder you're one of the forum's punching bags. Thanks for sticking around. :rose:
 
What are you talking about? Where have I given him a pass in this thread?
When I called him out, you went after me, not him.

If I post ad nauseam that he's a racist jerk, like I did with Cade, will you make a subsequent thread supporting him, like you did with Cade? Just 'cause I got under your skin once upon a time?
I made fun of Cade, and I made fun of SeanH, who threatened to kick his ass and then wussed out.

lol, you're fun; no wonder you're one of the forum's punching bags. Thanks for sticking around. :rose:
You're the laughing stock of the world. You're the freak show exhibit that the rest of us like to come in and aggravate.
 
So someone who disagrees with your opinion is a troll, according to you. Awesome…

I can't help but notice the irony in what you're saying:
What is the reason that You keep posting in these threads? Half of you guys have been mainly posting mainly trolling comments (accusations of misogyny and references to LJ's personal life). Instead of also coming up with counterarguments that address the thread topic - like SeanR did, for instance.
/////

There are plenty of people who disagree with me, who are not trolls.

You really want counter arguments as to whether black men have reasons to avoid black women?.

I could look for some internet posting about the subject, but I have many black friends who are men. They have no trouble approaching black women, so I'll go with personal observation.

What you go on, is your problem.
 
There are plenty of people who disagree with me, who are not trolls.

You really want counter arguments as to whether black men have reasons to avoid black women?.

I could look for some internet posting about the subject, but I have many black friends who are men. They have no trouble approaching black women, so I'll go with personal observation.

What you go on, is your problem.

A while back, SamuelX started a very interesting thread about the same subject: inter-racial dating.
The topic was the reverse: Why do some black women prefer to date white men?

It was felt that one of the reasons had to do with internalized oppression.

I told him that I understand that notion from my own lived experiences.
-In that, I noticed that, during the first few years, some of my fellow immigrants (depending also on their nationality or worldviews and so on) deal in certain ways with the process of immigration/acculturation: Some of them idealise their own native culture or country while dennigrating their adoptive country. And others idealise their adoptive country while devaluing their own roots.
- Most of it has to do with their change in social status from that of a powerful majority back in their native country, to a minority in the adoptive country.

I could never understand these things and what it means to belong to a minority group (regardless of the status held by that group) until I lived that experience through migration.
 
Last edited:
A while back, SamuelX started a very interesting thread about the same subject: inter-racial dating.
The topic was the reverse: Why do some black women prefer to date white men?

It was felt that one of the reasons had to do with internalized oppression.

I told him that I understand that notion from my own lived experiences.
-In that, I noticed that, during the first few years, some of my fellow immigrants (depending also on their nationality or worldviews and so on) deal in certain ways with the process of immigration/acculturation: Some of them idealise their own native culture or country while dennigrating their adoptive country. And others idealise their adoptive country while devaluing their own roots.
- Most of it has to do with their change in social status from that of a powerful majority back in their native country, to a minority in the adoptive country.

I could never understand these things and what it means to belong to a minority group (regardless of the status held by that group) until I lived that experience through migration.

It's really simple. Women don't like assholes and douche bags, and they are very good at recognizing them.

It's really not that difficult. They are the guys who make threads like this one.
 
It's really simple. Women don't like assholes and douche bags, and they are very good at recognizing them.

It's really not that difficult. They are the guys who make threads like this one.

I'm not saying that LJ and the article are right.
And you certainly see also the "douchbags" or "pussies" that you guys are referring to. But at other times, there are also other factors that influence their attitudes. And trust me, I know - I came across a few different scenarios.
I think that it's an interesting topic that has many layers, and I'd be interested to see what people have to say. Moreover, LJ has been in a defensive mode here so I haven't seen him discuss the topic.

EDIT
Sorry, I have to go. But I'll check the thread later on.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying that LJ and the article are right.
And you certainly see also the "douchbags" or "pussies" that you guys are referring to. But at other times, there are also other factors that influence their attitudes. And trust me, I know - I came across a few different scenarios.
I think that it's an interesting topic that has many layers, and I'd be interested to see what people have to say. Moreover, LJ has been in a defensive mode here so I haven't seen him discuss the topic.

EDIT
Sorry, I have to go. But I'll check the thread later on.

You've confused defensive with delusional and paranoid.
 
You're bragging about the # of followers you have on Tumblr.

After insulting their intelligence in the previous sentence.

https://media.giphy.com/media/mTtDdazMpaFi0/giphy.gif
Okay you got me, recognizing that they're smarter than you is downright insulting to Tumblr users. LOL I bet you don't even realize how badly you herpaderped here. That's why Tumblr users are smarter than you.

And here I was, thinking you would say that "these 100 people on an internet forum are more credible than 14 times that many people on a social media site". But you didn't even get that far. :cool:
 
I'm not saying that LJ and the article are right.
And you certainly see also the "douchbags" or "pussies" that you guys are referring to. But at other times, there are also other factors that influence their attitudes. And trust me, I know - I came across a few different scenarios.
I think that it's an interesting topic that has many layers, and I'd be interested to see what people have to say. Moreover, LJ has been in a defensive mode here so I haven't seen him discuss the topic.

EDIT
Sorry, I have to go. But I'll check the thread later on.
Nobody wants to discuss the topic. It immediately became an attack on me and not the facts. People are afraid of the facts that I put forward. The real defensive folks are the ones who will not admit that the reason why less men approach women of any race (and I even stated of any race in the OP) is that there is not only a very low payoff involved, but we're fed up that women feel entitled to sit on their ass and let men make the first move, and worse yet, there is a significant actual risk involved.

Nobody wants to talk about that. It never gets talked about. Except in the manosphere. But then all these whiny articles pop up about why fewer men come up and talk to women and women wonder why

HELLO MCFLY-ITA, YOU MADE IT UNPRODUCTIVE AND SOMETIMES HAZARDOUS TO APPROACH WOMEN

and everyone is afraid to address that. It's easier to gather up a white knight racist posse and try to silence a messenger and pretend you can bully them into silence.
 
Yep I did get something right. hopefully you'll catch up soon.
Catch up to your idiocy? Nah I don't think sapient creatures can fall that far and remember to breathe before they die of oxygen deprivation.
 
Back
Top