a question for american men

am off. going through probation and then it's full steam ahead. and honestly, it's like the same old men shaking their sticks at progress, female emancipation and uppity negroes (won't even touch on queerness). I miss some folks, but mostly it's just dinosaur after dinosaur or fluffers.

Hello!

:)
 
For some women, the size of a man's wallet is a key criteria that must be met for them to date.

For others, it doesn't matter at all.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves.
 
For some women, the size of a man's wallet is a key criteria that must be met for them to date.

For others, it doesn't matter at all.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves.

they were looking for men, you don't qualify.
 
hakim's pretty much discredited and most of the research in this area is based on quant self reporting using small samples, so it's not really of much use except for rags like the sun and daily mail.

further, you are actually citing 'research' which contradicts your position that women only want commitment from the peacocks. how do you reconcile that?

back up the statement or shut the fuck up.
 
things i learned in this thread:
vbm likes calling women names and seems perpetually angry.
...that's pretty much it.

things I have learned about dolf.

She is dysfunctional and stabs her friends in the back and nobody gives a rats ass about her opinion.
 
Here is the skinny.

It is normal for a women to "qualify her potential mate". However, the dysfunctional women of the GB along with the pandering men want us to believe women are somehow above all that. That somehow they ignore normal instinct.

Nobody wants a loser in a man. end of story. i never once stated that his income was the only motivating factor; however, his ability to provide and contribute financially is certainly of importance.

There is obviously no reason to provide links to these studies because the losers will tell you how that study or Doctor was discredited though they provide no links showing such or they just lack reading comprehension skills.
 
You're just another dumbfuck without the balls to admit when you're wrong.

I admitted I was wrong

I still say the pics looked like shit and the one that I saw did not look like them.

try paying attention.
 
I hate to bring this up but for you isn't long term commitment equivalent to paying for the whole night?

I honestly didn't see this before. *snerk*

try reading the results of questionnaires and studies you may learn sumptin.

and as a lesbian wtf would you know.

dumbass

^ See, this is where you really do look silly.
You asking a woman what a woman would know about a woman.

Not very bright, are you pet?

You are just what we call an idiot. Not an educated idiot, not an experienced idiot, just purely and simply an idiot.

Yup.

Quit your whinging, vbm.
 
^ See, this is where you really do look silly.
You asking a woman what a woman would know about a woman.

Not very bright, are you pet?

wrong.

No different than asking a straight man about gay men and their relationships.

Not very bright, are you pet?
 
You are just what we call an idiot. Not an educated idiot, not an experienced idiot, just purely and simply an idiot.

You love to repeat your stupid line, "no real world experience," but it is just that - a stupid line repeated ad nauseum by a moron. It is naught but the the empty and hollow words of someone who is out of his league.

yet you ran in our debate.

you were proven wrong by an idiot.

what does that make you.

I stand by my assertion, book learned and nuthin more.
 
Here is the skinny.

It is normal for a women to "qualify her potential mate".

Nobody wants a loser in a man. end of story. i never once stated that his income was the only motivating factor; however, his ability to provide and contribute financially is certainly of importance.

This is absolutely correct.
 
No, I'm not wrong. The fact that you can't see how idiotic your question to Kbate was only highlights how much of an idiot you are, pet.



fyp, yw. :)

that is just childish but then again I never been impressed with you.

fact is you women just refuse to admit what you are. at least I am much more honest in that regard.

;)
 
that is just childish but then again I never been impressed with you.

fact is you women just refuse to admit what you are. at least I am much more honest in that regard.

;)

I am pretty sure your sentence should read, "I have never been impressed by you."

However, if you prefer to keep it your way I will breathe a sigh of relief knowing for certain you never been impressed with me.

"You women" :D
 
things I have learned about dolf.

She is dysfunctional and stabs her friends in the back and nobody gives a rats ass about her opinion.

you alternate between ^^ this and telling me you would love to take me out to dinner, swinging from one to the other and then back again.

are you entirely stable?
 
you alternate between ^^ this and telling me you would love to take me out to dinner, swinging from one to the other and then back again.

are you entirely stable?

well for fucks sake woman

If you were not who you are I would not be interested in taking you to dinner.

I have always said you would be interesting to have a REAL conversation with face to face. More so I could read your eyes than anything else. Eyes tell all.

Normal women bore me to tears. Crazy has its advantages. I have never claimed you were not clever or smart. Two qualities I enjoy in a dinner companion.

I think you would discover something entirely unexpected beneath the GB persona when meeting me which will give you giggles to no end. :)
 
I am pretty sure your sentence should read, "I have never been impressed by you."

However, if you prefer to keep it your way I will breathe a sigh of relief knowing for certain you never been impressed with me.

"You women" :D

I talk how I talk and make no apologies (shrug)

and since you know what is meant it does not matter.
 
Back
Top