Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm planning to get myself tied while my domina's going to shop with my money.
I'll last approx. 2-3 hours, but I'd need an interesting and safe position to be tied of.
Could you, more experienced users show me some? Thanks
You folks are "gloome's", you always look at the down side.Physical injury is a real possibility when you've been immobilized too long, even if your body isn't stressed by the binding.
On top of that, being immobilized without someone being right there and aware you cannot escape to safety in the event of an emergency is kinda stupid. No one can predict a natural disaster, heart attack, or something else equally catastrophic.
It's not gloom, it's just being safe. Even if the bondage itself is unharmful, there're a million things that can go wrong.Live a little and have some fun and adventure.
I would suggest using a rope which is tied in such a way which allows the loop ends to be locked with padlocks. It would restrict your movement to a certain degree, for example a wrist tied to an ankle, or a wrist tied to another rope around your hips / thigh (obviously with a padlock holding it in place and the keys nowhere near you).
This would allow you to feel some element of bondage; you would still be locked up but you would also be able to cut the rope if you had any type of a problem with your free hand.
Personally, I would never allow a submissive to be alone in a position they were unable to get out of. (I all of a sudden feel like a preaching Bondage-Mother that wasn't my intention.) I wish you all the best and hope you enjoy a safe session.
Sigh. So we have 10 people warning him, but he actually only answers for what looks like the most unsafe bondage suggestion. Because people come to BDSM forums to hear only what they like to hear sometimes.
If there's a vanishingly small chance of a disaster, but I can avoid it by just not doing stupid things - I will do that. Besides, most fires come from electrical malfunction nowadays.A locked cage with the sub inside but unrestrained achieves pretty much the same effect. In a modern house with a conventional central heating system the chance of a fire occurring is vanishingly small. I have used this method for a couple of hours at a time.
Sigh. I think I'll have to answer with my own quote from the very previous post, because clearly you read only the first sentence.You have to see it in context though. People go mountaineering, motor bike racing, horse riding, hang gliding. All those activities carry far greater risks than being locked inside a cage for a couple of hours within an otherwise safe environment. But people do them because they enjoy them to such an extent that it outweighs the risk.
...because it involves only you and no one else. Or the responsibility is equally split.Risking life for entertainment is stupid. Yeah, I'm aware that you can say that every extreme sports is risky, but then again the control is always in your own hands. No one's pushing you out of a plane or down the mountain. This risk is acceptable...