My stories keeps got sent back and I don't understand why.

[53550]

I must have done this three or four times in the last five years, but I'll send you a PM tomorrow. I don't know if it's a rule or just etiquette, but it's not cool to mention other such sites in Lit forums.

Thank you! I'll wait.

There's a ballbusting subreddit?

Yes! It's r/BallbustingStories

Do you actually find that kind of thing interesting?

Kinda. I really don't know how to explain it aside from "I find it hot". It's probably due to the dominat role of the woman, but i can't quite give you an answer. I really wouldn't do that irl because it hurts very much, but in a sexual fantsy it turns me on. But it's tied to that, since i'm not into whipping or other stuff like that.

I've also broken an elbow and had a dislocated finger, and those weren't erotic either.

It's a bit different, but i really can't explain how.

who caught this peeping Tom character and "busted his balls?

The two cheerleader. Basically he peep on one, giving his back to the shower. The other one exit from there and bust him. They punish him, but they're kinda sadist so they got turned on and force him to lick them off. Also one of them is the daudther of the principal, so he can't risk to make her angrier.

And who sent that debt collector?

Another woman. BAsically the mc is in debt with her, so she send the debt collector to his house. She brutally bust his nuts sa a warning, then ive him an hultimatum.

 

[53550]

There's a scene in the Bible where Adam and Eve first realise they're naked, and they make themselves clothes from fig leaves.

A lot of classical sculptors and painters were deeply, deeply horny people who really liked drawing and painting attractive people naked. But a lot of them were working for the Church, which wasn't keen on paying people to make outright porn. So they would often add a fig leaf so that the figure wasn't technically naked. (Or in some cases, they created it fully nude, and then somebody else added a fig leaf afterwards.)

Here's an example, from Michelangelo's "Creation of Adam". If you look really closely, you can just see the tiniest imaginable fig leaf covering his dick.

View attachment 2278441

So in English "fig leaf" has become an expression that means doing something very small to excuse something that would otherwise be unacceptable.

An example in porn is all the videos with "step-parents", "step-brother" and "step-sister" and so on. Nobody takes the "step" part seriously. But it's an excuse that lets them pretend the videos aren't about incest.

Coool! Thank you!

 

[53550]

The OP needs to take his work to a site with actual rules that are consistently enforced. Here you have lies, hypocrisy and forum suck ups.

I sense some kind of dissatisfaction here

 

[53550]

Don’t forget limbo. My latest release is still stuck there at least one more day.

At least this place has fun social media.

I've got another story in pending for more than 2 days. I hope I'll got an answer soon.

 

[ElectricBlue]

I've got another story in pending for more than 2 days. I hope I'll got an answer soon.

You're new. Expect to wait at least a week, and don't touch your story in the meantime, or you'll bounce it to the end of the queue.

 

[53550]

You're new. Expect to wait at least a week, and don't touch your story in the meantime, or you'll bounce it to the end of the queue.

Oh well, guess it's time to wait then...

 

[madelinemasoch]

Oh well, guess it's time to wait then...

Patience is a virtue...

 

[53550]

Patience is a virtue...

I have the power of completely forget about this for a month, so I'm not scared

 

[purvis2]

As Bamagan has put it: if your characters are a doctor and a lawyer, then of course they're over 18 because outside Doogie Howser nobody gets to be a Doctor until they're 25 or so. Ditto with lawyers. So you need to think about who these characters are and what they do, and if they e.g. still live with mum and dad then something needs to be added to show that they still live with mum and dad despite being adults (so you might have a character complain about having to live with parents because of the shitty housing market, etc).

As for the pleasure part, I suspect that Bamagan has identified the issue you are having - the victim is truly a victim, rather than in their fantasy. I have written a story in which someone was truly a victim, but there was a pay-off, a factor which modified the situation. And I made sure the act was committed by a perpetrator a reader wouldn't have sympathy for, and there was a negative long-term result for the perpetrator. There was no glorification.

Usually good to put the characters in college instead of HS. You know, with the vast majority, they are 18 and over.

 

[purvis2]

I was told it was a requirement here. My hands were ties... ugly, ugly ties.

View attachment 2278576View attachment 2278577View attachment 2278578

I know dang well they had a secret relationship behind the scenes.

 

[AmonKo]

So does it mean I am an artificial being? because I do not understand why It is sent back (it is entirely possible that I am just dull) If it would be stated that because of my deviancy, I would accept it, fair play, but this?
me no machine

 

[Bamagan]

View attachment 2281905
So does it mean I am an artificial being? because I do not understand why It is sent back (it is entirely possible that I am just dull) If it would be stated that because of my deviancy, I would accept it, fair play, but this?
me no machine

Did you remember to click the box that proclaims you are not a robot? How can they be sure you're made of meat if the box is not clicked?
Just joking. But you should probably ask one of the editors to examine it. You might also take a closer look at any dialogue in your story. AI dialogue tends to be simple, choppy, and it often makes characters narrate or announce their actions, and some human writers do the same thing. There are several other similar 'flags' that can make something look machine generated when it's actually just not polished.

 

[AmonKo]

Did you remember to click the box that proclaims you are not a robot? How can they be sure you're made of meat if the box is not clicked?
Just joking. But you should probably ask one of the editors to examine it. You might also take a closer look at any dialogue in your story. AI dialogue tends to be simple, choppy, and it often makes characters narrate or announce their actions, and some human writers do the same thing. There are several other similar 'flags' that can make something look machine generated when it's actually just not polished.

Thanks for reply!



I brainstormed it a bit, maybe it is some HTML or something? since I copied and pasted it from other sites I posted. Well worst-case scenario, I will be banned, but since I am no Skynet, I will not go full Judgment Day on anyone



PS: AI stories are really a thing? lol!

 

[MillieDynamite]

What have the Polish people have to do with anything?

just not polished.

 

[AmonKo]

What have the Polish people have to do with anything?

"polish people" is an oxymoron

ps: it is not a racist slur since you cannot be self-racist

 

[MillieDynamite]

Hum... Like Jews for Jesus, does that make Mary an ox and a moron?

"polish people" is an oxymoron

ps: it is not a racist slur since you cannot be self-racist

 

[AmonKo]

Hum... Like Jews for Jesus, does that make Mary an ox and a moron?

Me from Europe, my homeland gangraped from every single direction through the last thousand years. Mongols, Russians, Nazis, ikea, you name it

Fun fact: The invading army killing local men but new babies are still born in every village :>

conclusion: me proper mix

also, 2% jew


It is not Mary's fault that Joseph was into all cockload thing

 

[MillieDynamite]

I wasn't talking about that Mary, but our Mary, @theWollstonecraftWoman.

 

[theWollstonecraftWoman]

Hum... Like Jews for Jesus, does that make Mary an ox and a moron?

What the hell, bitch! You're a meany.

 

[AmonKo]

I wasn't talking about that Mary, but our Mary, @theWollstonecraftWoman.

What can I say
me born catholic, me one track minded

 

[ElectricBlue]

View attachment 2281905
So does it mean I am an artificial being? because I do not understand why It is sent back (it is entirely possible that I am just dull) If it would be stated that because of my deviancy, I would accept it, fair play, but this?
me no machine

The editor thinks it's AI generated text.

 

[AmonKo]

If AI can generate text about goblins breeding kobolds with worgs I quit writing and just want this AI in my life

 

[MediocreAuthor]

The fig leaf that Lit has for allowing rape porn on the site is that the woman (it’s always a woman) being raped has to enjoy it at some point (yeah like that would happen).

I resent that. I have written almost as many instances of men being noncon'd as women.

Now depending on on your definitions, I write more "reluctance" than "rape" but I have multiple instances of men saying "No." and yet their pleas are ignored by the women, who continue regardless. I consider that rape.

Why, if the victim isn't consensual in a "non consensual" story, it got sent back? It's like not accepting a love story with a tag specifically for love story. What should I do?

I have written numerous non-con stories, (maledom and femdom) and I have never gotten a story rejection.

As others have said, just make sure both parties enjoy the sex by the end. One of the best ways to do that is through internal monologue. A character can outwardly be fully rejecting intercourse, but if we as the reader know that deep down they are wanting it, you're good.

In the story Eldritch Pact, a man gets prostate milked by a demigoddess, and he basically never fully goes along with the sex (although he does technically agrees to it before to prevent his own death). He even begs her to stop, and she ignores him... But he enjoys it by the end, so it passed without a hitch.

 

[RejectReality]

If AI can generate text about goblins breeding kobolds with worgs I quit writing and just want this AI in my life

Run a chunk of it through one of those free AI checkers and see what it says + what it highlights.

Any of mine I looked at said they were most likely human written, but it highlighted short sentences and a few other things.

Frankly I think depending on AI determining what's AI when there's a wealth of examples of false positives already circulating is more than a little concerning.

Resubmit and say it's entirely your work. No worries about getting banned for prohibited content. Work gets rejected, and that's the end of it. Plagiarism, bad behavior in the social areas of the site, spamming, and other unscrupulous activities may get you banned, but I've never heard of anyone getting banned for even multiple repeated story rejections.

 

[KeithD]

Just an observation about the "sending back" process here. For the first time in more than a decade, I had a chapter rejected--legitimately for something I didn't get changed when I previously published it where one of this site's rejection reasons doesn't exist. The send back quoted exactly the phrase in my 12,000-word submission that wouldn't fly. I corrected it easily and got it back into the submissions stream. The last time I had a rejection I had to figure out what in the text was a problem myself. My experience is that rejections have become more helpful to the writer there.