lovecraft68
Bad Doggie
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Posts
- 42,032
He seems to have gone through phases. And then at some point, he absolutely let others publish under his name, and their writing was amateur as fuck.
One thing I've noticed - as writers achieve more fame, their editors seem to stop cutting their work, and it shows. You need to let your editors hack your work, no matter how much people love your work. They know what they're doing. Longer isn't better, if half of it's pointless drivel that you wrote to explain something to yourself.
So, I'd agree with you. But I also agree with this quote. At this point, in my own evolution.
Best example of that was when King released the unedited version of the Stand. The first published version was in the 800 page range, the extended 'director's cut' was over 1100 I can tell you that whoever cut those 300 pages did their job because it was a bunch of rambling crap and excessive details the original read better without.
I recall in Cujo I think...the wife was having an affair and broke it off and the guy comes into the house when they're not home and it someone how turns into pages of his bitterness while he whacks off on her sheets.
Insomnia was the last book I read it was the cure for its title.
I think for me, he peaked at Pet Sematary.
As for fame making authors think they don't need an editor or just editors being afraid to edit them...FFS someone get Rice an editor. Better yet stop her from writing at all.