Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 66,568
He was in the WH meeting where the collusion narrative was being proposed.Don't know about the others, but Obama was never charged with anything nor referred for prosecution.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was in the WH meeting where the collusion narrative was being proposed.Don't know about the others, but Obama was never charged with anything nor referred for prosecution.
Guess who's running the *Disinformation Governance Board* The person who promoted the above disinformation. See how that works.The FACT that the laptop in question is HB’s is not and never was, in question. The FACT that “21 former intelligence officials agreed that it was likely Russian disinformation” has ALWAYS been known to be political propaganda.
None that you’re aware of. Unless you have insight into the Durham investigation, you don’t know if it does or does not, exist.You speculate and extrapolate, without a brain.
I'm not saying nothing exists that's a problem...I'm saying that the evidence doesn't exist to prove illegal activity.
I say the same about Trump's bullshit
You're still an idiotNone that you’re aware of. Unless you have insight into the Durham investigation, you don’t know if it does or does not, exist.
“Ohhh, he’s an angry little Elf!”You're still an idiot
One thing I don't understand. How is Hunter selling access to his father an impeachable offense for Biden?
Another thing I don't understand. People around politicians sell access to that politician all the time in Washington. It's so widespread it's considered normal there. So what's so fucking high crimes and misdemeanory about Hunter doing it here? I mean other than you don't like Biden but will overlook when Jared and Ivanka and Michael Flynn did the same thing for Trump during his administration.
Well, when sleepy Joe demanded publicly that Ukraine's top prosecutor Shokin be fired all the while Hunter was a board member or no **buckaroos for you** is *quid pro quo* in its purest form, and yet impeach Trump because the head nutjob speaker had the house majority without a legit statutory violation to impeach and hid behind the fact that impeachment is a political stunt, unethical but legal. Hypocrisy thick enough to cut with a knife
Oh I see. There's no real principle behind it. The only reason is the Democrats made impeachment a political stunt first so it's retaliation time.
Trump was cleared of any conspiracy charges
Trump never obstructed the investigation
Not angry at all...never have been.“Ohhh, he’s an angry little Elf!”
Your responses say otherwise!Not angry at all...never have been.
Your interpretation of my responses.Your responses say otherwise!
Personal insults are your MO apparently as is your inability to address the point. You fit the lefty stereotype perfectly.Your interpretation of my responses.
I'm typically shocked at how stupid you are....not angry
Then it's a good thing that wasn't the case with either of Trump's impeachments. Blackmailing a foreign leader for your own political benefit and inciting a riot with intent to overturn an election most certainly are offenses.If no offense was committed you shouldn't conjure up false charges because your head nutjob doesn't like someone.
Then it's a good thing that wasn't the case with either of Trump's impeachments.
Blackmailing a foreign leader for your own political benefit and inciting a riot with intent to overturn an election most certainly are offenses.
Trump never blackmailed a foreign leader. There was never Quid Pro Quo. The president has an obligation and is well within the purview of the executive branch to investigate corruption before allowing millions of dollars to transfer hands. That's protecting US and american interest.Then it's a good thing that wasn't the case with either of Trump's impeachments. Blackmailing a foreign leader for your own political benefit and inciting a riot with intent to overturn an election most certainly are offenses.
I want to remind you that impeachment is good,
removal is bad: Kamala...
No, there's not.There's an interesting conspiracy theory that they're trying to get her gone now,
replace her with Hillary and then retire Joe...
lmao A single disgruntled moron with an editorial doesn't make it a rumor. Plus you didn't read the article for comprehension which is an epidemic with you people.