This Needed To be Said

Yes, I know. The name of the Party has no relation to the party's totalitarian goals and policies.
You said that already. That has no relevance to you correctly using the name of the party.
 
AI Overview

Average IQ scores by group
Irrelevant to my point, and also ignores evidence of bias in IQ testing.
 
IQ testing is biased in favor of intelligent individuals, and races where these intelligent individuals predominate.
Yes, I get that you've chosen to believe that in order to justify your racism.
 
Not really. The Democratic Party loves to preach tolerance, but its record tells a different story. Antisemitism isn’t an occasional slip within the party, it’s become embedded. From members of “The Squad” vilifying Israel while excusing terror groups, to party leaders looking the other way, Jew-hatred has been rebranded as “progressive politics.” The Biden administration made it worse. By opening the doors to tens of thousands from regions openly hostile to Israel, and funneling many of them into colleges and universities, this White House has imported Hamas sympathizers straight into America’s cultural bloodstream. The result is a campus climate where Jewish students are harassed and threatened, while administrators bend over backwards to defend the very voices calling for Israel’s destruction. What we’re seeing isn’t just political negligence, it’s complicity. The Democratic Party once counted Jewish Americans as some of its most loyal supporters. Now, through cowardice and cynical pandering, it has chosen to empower those who despise them.
You gave up everything you ever believed in to worship a weak tyrant.

Fuck off, Jack.
 
Where is your evidence that my belief is not true?
It is very, very easy to find if you can be bothered to look for it. Just for one example:
One poignant case study involved a gifted program in a California school district that had been predominantly serving White students, despite a rapidly diversifying population. Upon examination, educators discovered that the assessment criteria relied heavily on linguistic skills and cultural knowledge unfamiliar to many minority students. Consequently, the district revamped its approach, implementing a more holistic evaluation process that included performance tasks and student portfolios. The results were significant: enrollment in gifted programs among Hispanic and Black students increased by 40% within three years, indicating that when tests honor cultural differences, they not only empower individuals but enrich educational environments as a whole.

https://blogs.psico-smart.com/blog-...lications-for-test-design-and-fairness-172557
 
It is very, very easy to find if you can be bothered to look for it. Just for one example:


https://blogs.psico-smart.com/blog-...lications-for-test-design-and-fairness-172557

IQ tests exist that require no knowledge of reading, mathematics, or English. Race gaps persist.

------------

It’s Been 20 Years Since No Child Left Behind. What’d We Learn?​

ByFrederick Hess,
Former Contributor.
Rick Hess is a scholar who writes about K-12 and higher education.

Sep 21, 2022, 06:00am EDT

The Gains Came at a Cost. The hope was that NCLB would raise “the ceiling” (promote educational excellence) as well as raise the floor (boost the performance of low-performing students). In practice, it didn’t really work out that way. School systems wound up resorting to all kinds of dubious, anti-excellence strategies in order to raise the floor. Meanwhile, they cut back on social studies, civics, the arts, recess, and gifted education in order to devote more time to tested subjects. All of this tended to lower the ceiling. Scores may have gone up, but it wasn’t clear students were learning more—and high-achievers tended to get put on the back-burner.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/freder...rs-since-no-child-left-behind-whatd-we-learn/
 
IQ tests exist that require no knowledge of reading, mathematics, or English. Race gaps persist.
Now it's my turn to ask you for a cite. The one you provide here makes no mention of IQ tests.

It’s Been 20 Years Since No Child Left Behind. What’d We Learn?​

ByFrederick Hess,
Former Contributor.
Rick Hess is a scholar who writes about K-12 and higher education.

Sep 21, 2022, 06:00am EDT

The Gains Came at a Cost. The hope was that NCLB would raise “the ceiling” (promote educational excellence) as well as raise the floor (boost the performance of low-performing students). In practice, it didn’t really work out that way. School systems wound up resorting to all kinds of dubious, anti-excellence strategies in order to raise the floor. Meanwhile, they cut back on social studies, civics, the arts, recess, and gifted education in order to devote more time to tested subjects. All of this tended to lower the ceiling. Scores may have gone up, but it wasn’t clear students were learning more—and high-achievers tended to get put on the back-burner.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/freder...rs-since-no-child-left-behind-whatd-we-learn/
Only fair to remember that NCLB was the work of staunch opponents of Affirmative Action who insisted on pretending kids from the ghetto could somehow perform just as well as kids who went to Andover if only they tried harder. So its failure is neither here nor there with respect to the question of whether Affirmative Action works.
 
Now it's my turn to ask you for a cite. The one you provide here makes no mention of IQ tests.
On the internet I could not find information specifically on culture free IQ tests. i did find this:

Latest Research on Black and White IQ, March 22, 2023​


In fact, there is overwhelming evidence to suggest that the black-white IQ gap is genetic and many of these studies are quite recent. Without an introduction to these findings, the public will be unable to form a logical opinion on the matter. Therefore, in this piece, readers will be invited to a synopsis of the latest findings in intelligence research.

The objective of this article is to disseminate obscure research to a discerning public with the expectation that readers will scrutinize these conclusions for themselves. Richard Lynn in his pioneering 2015 book Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis, points out that when tests measure the intelligence of black and white university students from similar backgrounds whites still record an IQ advantage. Similarly, comparisons of elite African students with European university students show an IQ advantage for whites.

Davide Piffer in a recent paper measuring gaps in intelligence between Africans and Europeans found that Europeans have higher polygenic scores for educational attainment than Africans. Due to significant differences between Africans and Europeans at the genetic loci linked to educational attainment, Piffer diminished environmental influences as a significant explanation for the black-white IQ gap. Furthermore, advances in admixture studies equally confirm the genetic basis of the black-white IQ gap.

https://www.eurocanadians.ca/2023/03/latest-research-black-and-white-iq

Most people want desperately to close the race gap in intelligence. If a method could be found that achieved this on a large scale it would be adopted on a large scale.
 
Only fair to remember that NCLB was the work of staunch opponents of Affirmative Action.
Can you document this? What I read is that initially there was nearly universal optimism that No Child Left Behind would achieve its goals.
 
On the internet I could not find information specifically on culture free IQ tests.
Then why did you claim "IQ tests exist that require no knowledge of reading, mathematics, or English. Race gaps persist."? Either you know of examples of that or you don't, and here you are saying you don't.

The Council of European Canadians is the brainchild of Ricardo Duchesne, a recognized white supremacist. It's no surprise at all that you'd find support for your views on a site like that.

Most people want desperately to close the race gap in intelligence. If a method could be found that achieved this on a large scale it would be adopted on a large scale.
I wish I could share your optimism on that one. In the country that elected Trump twice, I no longer believe this.

Can you document this? What I read is that initially there was nearly universal optimism that No Child Left Behind would achieve its goals.
What you read? You're substantially older than I am, which means you are easily old enough to remember 2002 and NCLB yourself. You surely remember it was officially the work of George W.M.D. Bush, which of course means it really came from some right-wing think tank. Nuff said.
 
Then why did you claim "IQ tests exist that require no knowledge of reading, mathematics, or English. Race gaps persist."? Either you know of examples of that or you don't, and here you are saying you don't.


The Council of European Canadians is the brainchild of Ricardo Duchesne, a recognized white supremacist. It's no surprise at all that you'd find support for your views on a site like that.


I wish I could share your optimism on that one. In the country that elected Trump twice, I no longer believe this.


What you read? You're substantially older than I am, which means you are easily old enough to remember 2002 and NCLB yourself. You surely remember it was officially the work of George W.M.D. Bush, which of course means it really came from some right-wing think tank. Nuff said.
I am widely read, but everything I read is not on the Intrnet.

This is President Bush introducing No Child Left Behind.

https://www.bing.com/videos/rivervi...eft+behind+act+of+2001+%2b+optimism&FORM=VDRE
 
Which doesn't mean he can't be a white supremacist.
I do not care what Lipton Matthews is. I do not care what Ricardo Duchesne is. What matters are facts that can be proved.

Jared Taylor has often been called a white supremacist.

This is what he has to say about racial differences:

Wherever you look, [East] Asians outperform whites academically and financially...

we have a considerably less than one standard deviation difference between East] Asian IQ — North Asian IQ — and white IQ. I think that, too, is a result of
genetics, and I think that that is what explains the dominance of [Eat] Asians in certain fields, and their lower rates of illegitimacy compared to whites, their
lower crime rates, their better achievement in school, their higher average incomes...

I think [East] Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful
society.

- Jared Taylor Interview

Professor J. Philippe Rushton has often been called a white supremacist. This is what he has to say about racial differences.

On average, Orientals are slower to mature, less fertile, less sexually active, less aggressive, and have larger brains and higher IQ scores...

The World Health Organization takes note of sexual diseases like syphilis, gonorrhea, herpes and chlamydia. They report low levels in China and Japan...

IQ tests measure intelligence and predict real life success. The races differ in brain size and on IQ tests. On average Orientals have the largest brains and highest IQs...

Orientals average 1 cubic inch more brain matter than Whites...

Studies of race differences in brain size use a number of methods, including MRI. All methods produce the same results. Orientals have the largest brains (on average),

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm
 
Last edited:
What matters are facts that can be proved.
You say this, and then you say...
Jared Taylor has often been called a white supremacist.

This is what he has to say about racial differences:

Wherever you look, [East] Asians outperform whites academically and financially...

we have a considerably less than one standard deviation difference between East] Asian IQ — North Asian IQ — and white IQ. I think that, too, is a result of
genetics, and I think that that is what explains the dominance of [Eat] Asians in certain fields, and their lower rates of illegitimacy compared to whites, their
lower crime rates, their better achievement in school, their higher average incomes...

I think [East] Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful
society.

- Jared Taylor Interview
There are three "I think"s in there. Those are not facts that can be proved. It can, on the other hand, be proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Jared Taylor is a white supremacist. Even Trump disavowed his support, that's how open of a racist he is.


Professor J. Philippe Rushton has often been called a white supremacist. This is what he has to say about racial differences.

On average, Orientals are slower to mature, less fertile, less sexually active, less aggressive, and have larger brains and higher IQ scores...

The World Health Organization takes note of sexual diseases like syphilis, gonorrhea, herpes and chlamydia. They report low levels in China and Japan...

IQ tests measure intelligence and predict real life success. The races differ in brain size and on IQ tests. On average Orientals have the largest brains and highest IQs...

Orientals average 1 cubic inch more brain matter than Whites...

Studies of race differences in brain size use a number of methods, including MRI. All methods produce the same results. Orientals have the largest brains (on average),

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm
Brain size is not directly related to intelligence levels, nor are STD rates (some very book-smart people do some very dumb things in their personal lives). You are always conflating sexual morality with intelligence, and they are two very different things. And while I know you well enough to know you have undoubtedly invented some twisted logic by which Rushton wasn't racist at all, it is a provable fact that his research on race and crime has been discredited: https://psychology.uwo.ca/people/faculty/remembrance/rushton.html
 
Brain size is not directly related to intelligence levels, nor are STD rates (some very book-smart people do some very dumb things in their personal lives). You are always conflating sexual morality with intelligence, and they are two very different things. And while I know you well enough to know you have undoubtedly invented some twisted logic by which Rushton wasn't racist at all, it is a provable fact that his research on race and crime has been discredited: https://psychology.uwo.ca/people/faculty/remembrance/rushton.html
Brain size is the most important factor that correlates with intelligence. Brain size can be easily measured.
 
You say this, and then you say...

There are three "I think"s in there. Those are not facts that can be proved. It can, on the other hand, be proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Jared Taylor is a white supremacist. Even Trump disavowed his support, that's how open of a racist he is.
What can be proved is that by every objective, measurable criterion Orientals tend to be more intelligent than whites. No one who acknowledges this can be called a white supremacist.
 
Back
Top