YDB95
Hopeless Romantic!
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 14,105
Which doesn't mean he can't be a white supremacist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which doesn't mean he can't be a white supremacist.
I do not care what Lipton Matthews is. I do not care what Ricardo Duchesne is. What matters are facts that can be proved.Which doesn't mean he can't be a white supremacist.
You say this, and then you say...What matters are facts that can be proved.
There are three "I think"s in there. Those are not facts that can be proved. It can, on the other hand, be proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Jared Taylor is a white supremacist. Even Trump disavowed his support, that's how open of a racist he is.Jared Taylor has often been called a white supremacist.
This is what he has to say about racial differences:
Wherever you look, [East] Asians outperform whites academically and financially...
we have a considerably less than one standard deviation difference between East] Asian IQ — North Asian IQ — and white IQ. I think that, too, is a result of
genetics, and I think that that is what explains the dominance of [Eat] Asians in certain fields, and their lower rates of illegitimacy compared to whites, their
lower crime rates, their better achievement in school, their higher average incomes...
I think [East] Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful
society.
- Jared Taylor Interview
Brain size is not directly related to intelligence levels, nor are STD rates (some very book-smart people do some very dumb things in their personal lives). You are always conflating sexual morality with intelligence, and they are two very different things. And while I know you well enough to know you have undoubtedly invented some twisted logic by which Rushton wasn't racist at all, it is a provable fact that his research on race and crime has been discredited: https://psychology.uwo.ca/people/faculty/remembrance/rushton.htmlProfessor J. Philippe Rushton has often been called a white supremacist. This is what he has to say about racial differences.
On average, Orientals are slower to mature, less fertile, less sexually active, less aggressive, and have larger brains and higher IQ scores...
The World Health Organization takes note of sexual diseases like syphilis, gonorrhea, herpes and chlamydia. They report low levels in China and Japan...
IQ tests measure intelligence and predict real life success. The races differ in brain size and on IQ tests. On average Orientals have the largest brains and highest IQs...
Orientals average 1 cubic inch more brain matter than Whites...
Studies of race differences in brain size use a number of methods, including MRI. All methods produce the same results. Orientals have the largest brains (on average),
http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm
Brain size is the most important factor that correlates with intelligence. Brain size can be easily measured.Brain size is not directly related to intelligence levels, nor are STD rates (some very book-smart people do some very dumb things in their personal lives). You are always conflating sexual morality with intelligence, and they are two very different things. And while I know you well enough to know you have undoubtedly invented some twisted logic by which Rushton wasn't racist at all, it is a provable fact that his research on race and crime has been discredited: https://psychology.uwo.ca/people/faculty/remembrance/rushton.html
What can be proved is that by every objective, measurable criterion Orientals tend to be more intelligent than whites. No one who acknowledges this can be called a white supremacist.You say this, and then you say...
There are three "I think"s in there. Those are not facts that can be proved. It can, on the other hand, be proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Jared Taylor is a white supremacist. Even Trump disavowed his support, that's how open of a racist he is.
Of course they can. But whatever lets you sleep at night.What can be proved is that by every objective, measurable criterion Orientals tend to be more intelligent than whites. No one who acknowledges this can be called a white supremacist.
Someone who acknowledges that Orientals tend to be more intelligent than whites and that Orientals have lower rates of crime and illegitimacy than whites can only be called a white supremacist by denying that the term has any meaning.Of course they can. But whatever lets you sleep at night.
Irrelevant to my point, and also ignores evidence of bias in IQ testing.
YDB95 refuses to accept facts that violate what he wants to believe in.I've noticed that everything, LITERALLY EVERYTHING, which you don't agree with in either principle or outcome, is "biased" in your mind.
Why is that?
White supremacy is not only about intelligence.Someone who acknowledges that Orientals tend to be more intelligent than whites and that Orientals have lower rates of crime and illegitimacy than whites can only be called a white supremacist by denying that the term has any meaning.
The destruction of America is mostly coming from crazy white males with guns.September 2, 2025
Liberal Women and the Destruction of American Civilization
By Steve McCann
Over the past four decades, participation in protests and demonstrations advocating policies that eventuate in the destruction of a culture and society have evolved into a full-time liberal female occupation. The majority of these protestors are 50+ year-old white women augmented by a vast number of vacuous college-educated white women of all age groups who together with their race-obsessed college-educated black female counterparts are mindlessly hellbent on destroying American civilization.
The societal damage that liberal females, and in particular white women, have wrought over the past four decades is bordering on the incalculable and brings to mind a quote from Helen Keller (1880-1968). In her autobiography The Story of My Life she wrote: “I think the degree of a nation’s civilization may be measured by the degree of enlightenment of its women.” There is a direct correlation between the accelerated decline of American civilization over the past forty years and the rise of the outsized influence of unenlightened and supercilious liberal women.
Some years ago, I watched a panel discussion with a number of professors at a prestigious Ivy League university. These academics were regaling a naïve and worshipful audience of mostly white with a smattering of black women about the necessity of viewing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), the LGTBQ movement, and Third Wave Feminism as all-encompassing national civil rights battles.
The references to the United States as a racist and oppressive nation founded on white patriarchy were incessant. These leftists claimed, to raucous applause, that white privilege and resultant oppression required the immediate acceleration of the LGTBQ and DEI agendas and the transformation of American culture and society.
The adoring and reverential expressions on the faces of the young women in the audience was priceless. It was as if they had suddenly discovered meaning and purpose in their apparently guilt-ridden, or cosseted, or rage-filled lives. They no doubt thought that the prospect of being swept up a grand crusade of promoting all manner of “civil rights” in a heartless, capitalistic society would bring relevance to their lives. What they did not fathom was that they were being manipulated in order to bring about a socialist one-party oligarchy by playing on their emotions and the nation’s history of civil rights movements.
Much more here:https://www.americanthinker.com/art...the_destruction_of_american_civilization.html
Rage-driven leftist women, obsessed with moral signaling, have upended traditional norms and institutions across America. Their activism prioritizes outrage over dialogue, undermining compromise and social cohesion. Infiltrating the military, law enforcement, corporate, and political arenas, critics argue they’ve weakened standards, efficiency, and stability, replacing competence with ideology and emotion.