SgtSpiderMan
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Posts
- 28,210
Wow you still don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. Again, the states run public schools, not the feds. Funding already follows the students. Yes, it was fair for you to have to pay for public schools since you were using them even though you chose to have your kids go to a private school. What would be unfair is for taxpayers to pay for your kids to go to a school that the taxpayers have no say in how is run. We have no idea how well your kids did at the private school.You don't know what you're talking about. DoE is another redundant bloated bureaucracy.
Don't need a bureaucracy to manage loans. imho the education dep or feds shouldn't be in the loan business.
Enforce civil rights? We have local, state and a justice department to enforce civil rights. Men competing in women's sports.
Recommend education reform? Do you mean recommending puberty blockers for kids, inappropriate reading material, DEI, CRT. Since they've been overseeing K-12 standards have been dropping.
We've dropped from *1st through 3* in academics among industrial nations to among the last. Let funding be distributed directly to students and let competition reign within the education system and grant freedom for school choice. Just some thoughts. My girls went to parochial school and did extremely well the problem for me was, it was unfair for me to pay for parochial school tuition and pay taxes for public schools. If the feds are responsible for educating our children then parochial and charter schools fall under those parameters, they help achieve the mission. Again take the funding out of the Dep o Education and distribute directly to parents.
States run their athletics and they determine who is eligible to play, not the feds.
If feds don’t give out student loans who will?
You really don’t have a clue what DOE does and you’re proving it.