Baztrachian
Ars est celare artem
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Posts
- 1,198
I stand corrected on this, I assumed in the American system it would be the opposite.
I hold intellectual honesty in high esteem. Respects.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I stand corrected on this, I assumed in the American system it would be the opposite.
I'm not afraid to admit I'm wrong. No one is 100% right all the time, nor 100% wrong all the time. I should have doubled checked my opinion.I hold intellectual honesty in high esteem. Respects.
If you ban collective bargaining, then a union is ineffective....it's kind of like having a gun with no ammunition or a car with no tires...
I'm not afraid to admit I'm wrong. No one is 100% right all the time, nor 100% wrong all the time. I should have doubled checked my opinion.
Without collective bargaining, the employer doesn't have to include anything you wrote in the agreement. It's a "here's our offer", take it or leave it.Kinda like the employers do where there is no Union.No, collective bargaining is just one of the things an effective union can do. Lobbying for work place safety, lobbying for civil rights, voter outreach, campaign donations and campaign volunteer efforts, legal assistance for union members...all of these things are things the unions can and should do regardless of collective bargaining.
Without collective bargaining, the employer doesn't have to include anything you wrote in the agreement. It's a "here's our offer", take it or leave it. Kinda like the employers do where there is no Union.
https://www.businessinsider.com/states-where-teachers-unions-are-illegal-2011-2What state doesn't have a teacher's union? Name one.
There was never any "war on coal." The coal industry is dying because natural gas is cheaper.The United Mine Workers are another. They adamantly supported Democrats who adamantly wanted to shut down every last mining operation in the US. The result?
Just say you're a fucking White Supremacist and be done with it, spanky.On the other side of the argument is that Louisiana schools are required to reserve seats for black students who otherwise may not qualify according to race-neutral criteria.
As can be seen in practice here:
https://www.deltacs.org/about-us/enrollment
In short, the school is intended to serve residents of the Concordia Parish but they have to bring in black students from outside of their purview in order to satisfy what is now an onerous court order.
A court order that was intended to get rid of racial discrimination is now being used to implement it because when an insufficient number of black students is recruited to this school then a corresponding number of other students have to be denied access in order to achieve court ordered percentages of racial distribution.
Around fifty years ago there were a few racial discrimination cases against government agencies that didn't have any black people on staff for the simple reason that they had no black people living in their jurisdictions. When the activist courts ordered that black people were to be recruited from outside the jurisdiction (in one case a state) the appellate courts said this was overreach.
Back to the schools, barring a white kid access to an educational opportunity because not enough black kids can be found is patently discriminatory.
The court order is past its best-by date and it's time to end it.
There was never any "war on coal." The coal industry is dying because natural gas is cheaper.
Texas governor signs $1B voucher bill in milestone for school choice supportersWell, anyway, ending this order does not mean the public schools will again be segregated.
The real danger in that regard is "vouchers," or any other form of public support for private schools. There are private schools all over the South that were founded in the 1960s as all-white "segregation academies."