Taking "Our" Democracy back.

I'm glad you feel safe enough to admit your white supremacist beliefs.

Were you in Charlottesville?
Generally speaking, I prefer East Asians to whites, although I am white. I prefer them because they tend to be more intelligent than we are, and they have lower rates of crime and illegitimacy.

I am also a Gentile. I would not have participated in the rally at Charlottesville, because I would not participate in a rally that had anti - Jewish aspects.
 
For all the times you've said that, in no way does that prove you're not a white supremacist. It simply means you're an equal opportunity racist.
How do you define "white supremacist?" How do you define "racist?"

I define "white supremacist" as one who believes that white Gentiles are superior to other races. i do not believe that.
 
How do you define "white supremacist?" How do you define "racist?"

I define "white supremacist" as one who believes that white Gentiles are superior to other races.

He defines it as anyone not himself irrespective of the actual truth or facts because he, like rorbags and rubbery, is just going to make shit up.
 
I mean, it DOES take one to know one, right?

If you believe that, let's re-visit all the times you've identified someone else as being a racist. :)

(Seriously, you must be the worst lawyer, ever. LOL)

You do realize that you just engaged in racism, right?

Can't have racism without a white dude in the building somewhere.

Lol. It's like you insist on your racism

You managed to shoehorn a butt load of fat shaming, racism, and misogyny

the left's racism.

Quoted as proof of someone's bigotry and racism.

vile Jasmine's overt racism.

Lol, you just can't let your racism go, can you?

...you open your eyes to finally see that DEI is nothing but racism.

The green new deal died after it ran into the brown thumb of racism

And there's the racism post from one of the troll group.

you're showing your racism and bigotry.

DEI did nothing except promote racism

Racism is a human condition.

How totally predictable; rubbery getting caught promoting racism

Your country was founded on systemic racism
 
Trump loves to deflect and defer to states’ rights (until they defy his agenda.. then he throws a fit). Blue states should stop paying federal taxes

Yes, tell us how you're going to defy the Federal Government with impunity.
 
If you believe that, let's re-visit all the times you've identified someone else as being a racist. :)

(Seriously, you must be the worst lawyer, ever. LOL)

Not my fault you seem to fit the mold.
 
If you believe that, let's re-visit all the times you've identified someone else as being a racist. :)

(Seriously, you must be the worst lawyer, ever. LOL)
Ha, I’m surprised the term reverse racism hasn’t been used
Yes, tell us how you're going to defy the Federal Government with impunity.
the same impunity the prez has for withholding disaster relief funds
 
Yes you do, you just don't think they're superior to all other races.
In comparing the races, I do not use a word like "superior." That would assert that every member of one race is superior to every member of another race. Moreover, it would beg the question of what is meant by "superior."
 
Ha, I’m surprised the term reverse racism hasn’t been used

the same impunity the prez has for withholding disaster relief funds

So you believe you have sovereign immunity and can defy the law?

Hah! Good luck with that one.
 
So you believe you have sovereign immunity and can defy the law?

Hah! Good luck with that one.
It will take more than luck, as you note.

Trump touts states’ rights—until a state pushes back against his agenda. Then suddenly, the feds must step in. It raises an interesting question: if Trump can withhold federal disaster funds seemingly on a whim, can states do the same in reverse? Could a state, say California or New York, legally refuse to send federal tax dollars to Washington?

Some forum members have floated the idea: if red states can pick and choose federal laws to follow (or not), then what stops blue states from withholding funds in protest when the federal government acts in bad faith or undermines their policies?

It's clear that under the Constitution, individuals pay federal taxes, not states. The IRS collects directly from taxpayers. States themselves don’t “send” tax payments—they remit payroll and other collected taxes in the course of their operations, but it’s not optional.

However, what if a state tried to resist federally mandated spending or challenged how its tax base is used? What precedent exists for that kind of defiance? Could a legal case ever be made?

On the flip side, presidents like Trump have withheld aid from states based on political loyalty, often with vague or shifting justification. Puerto Rico, California wildfires, and COVID-era support all come to mind. So the question stands: if the executive can selectively punish states, why can’t states retaliate in kind?
 
A Federal court has affirmed the Texas Election Protection and Integrity Act of 2021. A model for the rest of the nation.
 
Back
Top