knightshadow
Original Shadow Master
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Posts
- 4,297
I was just reading an article on ABCnews.com about a court decision in California. A teen boy was convicted of rape from an instant of sexual intercourse with a teen girl. They were at a party, had some drinks and decided to go off together. As the intercourse was starting, she decided that she didn't want to continue. It appears he had already entered her and asked for a minute to finish. The whole episode last about five minutes. She pressed charges and he was convicted. Now this week the California High Courts upheld the decision stating that "No" meant "No". I found it interesting because the article asked does "Yes" really mean "Yes".
I'm not sure how I feel about this. After all, he didn't force himself on her. She had agreed. I know it's not right to go against someones wishes, but it seems that in a case where you have already started the act, nature does take over. I could see if they hadn't started yet. I guess I'm not sure where I stand on this.
Oh, by the way, the boy is doing prison time in a juvy prison. How is this going to effect him for the rest of his life? Isn't he now a sexual predator and for the rest of his life he will be watched?
I'm not sure how I feel about this. After all, he didn't force himself on her. She had agreed. I know it's not right to go against someones wishes, but it seems that in a case where you have already started the act, nature does take over. I could see if they hadn't started yet. I guess I'm not sure where I stand on this.
Oh, by the way, the boy is doing prison time in a juvy prison. How is this going to effect him for the rest of his life? Isn't he now a sexual predator and for the rest of his life he will be watched?