Selective warnings?

[Kantarii]

If interpretation is subjective, what's the point of TOS?

You sound as if you want the discussion board to run the way you want it to.

Doesn’t work that way.

Just because you find something you think is a violation, Laurel gets that decision.

Otherwise your name would be on the door, right?

 

[InsideTheBeltway]

You sound as if you want the discussion board to run the way you want it to.

Doesn’t work that way.

Just because you find something you think is a violation, Laurel gets that decision.

Otherwise your name would be on the door, right?

I'm not looking for any special consideration for me or for anyone else.

All I'm asking is that all TOS violations be properly and fairly addressed.

 

[Kantarii]

I'm not looking for any special consideration for me or for anyone else.

All I'm asking is that all TOS violations be properly and fairly addressed.

How do you know they aren’t being properly addressed?

You’re looking at the rules through your eyes, not Laurel’s

This is a place of business. Hers not ours.

Some things you just have to deal with.

 

[FineWhine]

I'm not looking for any special consideration for me or for anyone else.

All I'm asking is that all TOS violations be properly and fairly addressed.

twitter doesnt, goog doesnt, facebook doesnt, redditt doesnt, msm doesnt etc, why should lit? deal with it, its a one way street, always.

 

[Kantarii]

If the rules were yours to interpret, who would you ban?

The Left? The Right?

People of Color? White people?

Men? Women? Transgender?

Gay? Bisexual? Straight?

Old people?

Or just people you don’t agree with?

In any case, it’s a lost cause to fight the war
you’re waging because nothing is going to change
to suit you personally.

 

[InsideTheBeltway]

If the rules were yours to interpret, who would you ban?

The Left? The Right?

People of Color? White people?

Men? Women? Transgender?

Gay? Bisexual? Straight?

Old people?

Or just people you don’t agree with?

I would ban all members that violated TOS.

 

[InsideTheBeltway]

Why would the admin pay any attention to reporting done by the alt of a banned member?



[/thread]

Any member that violates TOS should be banned.

 

[Kantarii]

I would ban all members that violated TOS.

Fair enough.

But again, determining what is a violation of the rules isn’t in your hands.

If you think there is a violation - report it.

If they get banned, fine.

But don’t get pissy if they aren’t banned.

The decision wasn’t yours to make.

That’s like saying the cop that pulls you over for speeding and gives you a ticket has a say so in your punishment. People talk their way outta tickets in court every day.

 

[InsideTheBeltway]

Fair enough.

But again, determining what is a violation of the rules isn’t in your hands.

If you think there is a violation - report it.

If they get banned, fine.

But don’t get pissy if they aren’t banned.

The decision wasn’t yours to make.

That’s like saying the cop that pulls you over for speeding and gives you a ticket has a say so in your punishment.

Thanks for the conversation this morning.

 

[Kantarii]

Thanks for the conversation this morning.

It’s all good.

Just remember, if you don’t like hamburgers you can always go somewhere else to eat.

Makes you wonder why people come back after being banned, huh?

 

[FineWhine]

I would ban all members that violated TOS.

who defines tos? last week, mcconnel campaign was booted from twitter for posting a video of people calling for killing mcconnell, the people who called for the killings werent booted......who defines tos?

 

[Wrong Element]

The butter/Spidey lobby is very powerful.

Yeah, I really wish they'd knock it off with the phone calls and the direct mail.

 

[jaF0]

The offenders I reported need to be banned.

Start your own site, make your own rules.

Otherwise, Hush.

 

[silver gurl]

Unless your personal info is being posted, such as address, phone etc or the "p" word is being used, who cares?

It's just a board. If you are that offended, step away from the internet.

 

[jaF0]

Any member that violates TOS should be banned.

You support Capital Punishment for what YOU perceive as offenses even if others don't?

 

[InsideTheBeltway]

Unless your personal info is being posted, such as address, phone etc or the "p" word is being used, who cares?

It's just a board. If you are that offended, step away from the internet.

Disclosing personal information of other members was just one of the issues I mentioned. Spamming and threats of violence were the other two.

Do you agree that spamming and threats of violence are violations of TOS?

 

[InsideTheBeltway]

You support Capital Punishment for what YOU perceive as offenses even if others don't?

I never mentioned capital punishment.

I would like admin to ban all TOS violators.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Why trot out a new name?

https://media1.tenor.com/images/506e6ddff6f6a8cbb746b30a61489956/tenor.gif?itemid=3405980

 

[jaF0]

I never mentioned capital punishment.

I would like admin to ban ...

Same thing in the virtual world, ending the life of that ID.

 

[InsideTheBeltway]

Why trot out a new name?

https://media1.tenor.com/images/506e6ddff6f6a8cbb746b30a61489956/tenor.gif?itemid=3405980

Do you agree admin should ban TOS violators?

 

[InsideTheBeltway]

Same thing in the virtual world, ending the life of that ID.

Are you saying admin shouldn't ban TOS violators?

 

[ShagTimes]

I reported VeraBad for spamming. No warning has been issued.

I reported FukLuk for threatening another member. No warning has been issued.

I reported IrezumiKiss, von_Bismarck, and RobDownSouth for disclosing personal information about another members. No warnings have been issued.

Why do you feel the need to report these things?

 

[InsideTheBeltway]

Why do you feel the need to report these things?

To ensure admin bans the violators.