Selective warnings?

InsideTheBeltway

Loves Spam
Joined
Mar 4, 2019
Posts
47
I reported VeraBad for spamming. No warning has been issued.

I reported FukLuk for threatening another member. No warning has been issued.

I reported IrezumiKiss, von_Bismarck, and RobDownSouth for disclosing personal information about another members. No warnings have been issued.
 
This place could use a hall monitor.

Applications are being accepted.

Volunteers? Anyone?

Anyone?
 
It’s all fun and games till lives get fucked with in real life. Not that the site owners care even then. It will probably take a lawsuit to get change to happen here. Several frequent offenders do live in areas where cyber bullying is a crime.
 
I reported VeraBad for spamming. No warning has been issued.

I reported FukLuk for threatening another member. No warning has been issued.

I reported IrezumiKiss, von_Bismarck, and RobDownSouth for disclosing personal information about another members. No warnings have been issued.

What personal information? :confused:

Edit: Oh, it's a performance alt.
 
It’s all fun and games till lives get fucked with in real life. Not that the site owners care even then. It will probably take a lawsuit to get change to happen here. Several frequent offenders do live in areas where cyber bullying is a crime.

The offenders I reported need to be banned.
 
Threats of violence, spamming, & disclosing personal information about other members need to stopped.


Stopped? Yes.

But, banning people isn’t going to change anything.

Most come back with a new profile.

On a mission, they say.
 
I think that the OP is a Q alt. He talked about reporting VeraBad in another thread.

As usual, Q takes the high road but he's self serving and full of shit. When I was banned with no clear motive, he danced on my grave.
And wtf did VeraBad/ CarnalFlower do to him? She might be out of bounds politically, but she didn't harass individual posters.

This shit is beyond ridiculous. Spidey/butters versus Q, with their reporting and attrition wars.

In saying that, the rules are clearly enforced subjectively. The butter/Spidey lobby is very powerful. I bet they try to get their workmates fired too over nonsense, irl.
 
Stopped? Yes.

But, banning people isn’t going to change anything.

Most come back with a new profile.

On a mission, they say.

By warning or banning the offenders I reported, admin will be sending a message that no one is free to violate TOS.
 
I think that the OP is a Q alt. He talked about reporting VeraBad in another thread.

As usual, Q takes the high road but he's self serving and full of shit. When I was banned with no clear motive, he danced on my grave.
And wtf did VeraBad/ CarnalFlower do to him? She might be out of bounds politically, but she didn't harass individual posters.

This shit is beyond ridiculous. Spidey/butters versus Q, with their reporting and attrition wars.

In saying that, the rules are clearly enforced subjectively. The butter/Spidey lobby is very powerful. I bet they try to get their workmates fired too over nonsense, irl.

I'm not a "Q alt."
 
By warning or banning the offenders I reported, admin will be sending a message that no one is free to violate TOS.

Why stop at the people you mentioned?

There are dozens more, or are you just cherry picking who to report?

Reporting someone doesn’t mean they’re going to be banned or given a warning.

Laurel interprets her rules and applies them as needed.

That’s not a decision any of us get to make.

Forcing the hand isn’t going to change a thing.
 
butters clearly reported Matt (by herself or alongside others).

Because she kept monitoring Lit. in her jammies at midnight, and the moment someone commented on Matt's banning, she jumped in.

So ridiculous... Middle school tattle tell.
 
Why stop at the people you mentioned?

There are dozens more, or are you just cherry picking who to report?

Reporting someone doesn’t mean they’re going to be banned or given a warning.

Laurel interprets her rules and applies them as needed.

That’s not a decision any of us get to make.

If interpretation is subjective, what's the point of TOS?
 
Back
Top