Repeal the 2nd Amendment

Even if it were legally, it would never happen effectively.

They're just not getting them.
They're losing ground in the Supreme Court but there are some hold out states that think they're above the Constitution. Ironically is the same state governors that became tyrants during covid while mumbling 'democracy' as often as they could...........even when it made no sense to do so.
 
No, private ownership of guns is NOT any use for national defense.

"Red Dawn" was not realistic story.
These guns owned by private citizens are a strong deterrent from other countries trying to invade the US. Again I say keep criminals locked up and stop the failed experiment of cashless bail. Force the DA's to do their jobs and prosecute. You want the guns gone now but yet as soon as they are needed you would want one but not be able to get one. Chicago has some strict guns laws and it is a disaster from the criminals. Australia has the strictest gun laws in the world and their crime increased after the laws were implemented.
 
These guns owned by private citizens are a strong deterrent from other countries trying to invade the US.
No country has even tried to since the UK in 1812, and citizens' guns didn't scare THEM one little bit.

At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? — Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! — All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.

-- Abraham Lincoln
 
When I heard people ranting about government plans to take their guns, I was not sure which rants were satire. Doesn't matter now. The gunhuggers can point to this thread and say "from my cold dead hands." The most satirical outlandish scenarios now look plausible, or they became documented events.
 
When I heard people ranting about government plans to take their guns, I was not sure which rants were satire. Doesn't matter now. The gunhuggers can point to this thread and say "from my cold dead hands."

"Your offer is acceptable."
 
“SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

I’m not sure how many times I have to repeat it, but it should become a little mantra for you Radicalized Killer Furries.

Now repeat after me…
 
“SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

I’m not sure how many times I have to repeat it, but it should become a little mantra for you Radicalized Killer Furries.

Now repeat after me…
Repeat after me: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state . . ."

But, that is a LIE. We have not used militia in more than a hundred years -- it is NOT necessary! The whole 2A is based on a lie!
 
Repeat after me: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state . . ."

But, that is a LIE. We have not used militia in more than a hundred years -- it is NOT necessary! The whole 2A is based on a lie!
Then repeal it. It’s that simple.

I’ll give you a hint…the wind isn’t behind your sails on this…but you keep blowing.🤣
 
No country has even tried to since the UK in 1812, and citizens' guns didn't scare THEM one little bit.

At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? — Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! — All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.

-- Abraham Lincoln
There is a scenario where a crazy person from a nuclear state (hmm there aren't any of them in this glorious world) could set off a simple EMP in the lower atmosphere knocking out power and frying electronics for most of if not all of the US. At that point we are sitting blind and anyone could step foot on this country. Now with you saying that if anything were to happen it would come from within. Exactly what the 2nd Amendment was created for. Just because it has never happened doesn't mean you simple cancel part of the constitution and hope it never happens. You take away the guns then not if but when something rises from within the nation is left unprotected from whatever rises up. Thank you for proving my point in your statement.
 
Now with you saying that if anything were to happen it would come from within. Exactly what the 2nd Amendment was created for.

But that is NOT what the 2A was created for. The purpose of the 2A was never to facilitate rebellion. It was to facilitate a militia-based national defense system -- which is now an utterly stupid and irrelevant goal.
 
“SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

I’m not sure how many times I have to repeat it, but it should become a little mantra for you Radicalized Killer Furries.

Now repeat after me…
Yes, that's why we're talking about repealing the 2nd Amendment. If you think it should stay, make your case.
 
The purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to suppress slave rebellions. Since abolition and the creation of the National Guard, it serves no useful purpose.
A second reason in establishing the second amendment was so that an armed militia could help in killing/removing the indigenous population. That way we could steal their land more easily.
 
A second reason in establishing the second amendment was so that an armed militia could help in killing/removing the indigenous population. That way we could steal their land more easily.

Conquer, not steal. There is a difference. :D
 
yep notice how they never protest in gun friendly areas? they wouldn't last a second in my town.
Weatherford TX, they tried to bus them in during the summer of love, it didn't go the way they thought it would and they ended up just crying about how unfortable they are because of all the WACIST WHYTEEZ and left, presumably to to set shit on fire in Ft.Worth like an hour later.
 
Weatherford TX, they tried to bus them in during the summer of love, it didn't go the way they thought it would and they ended up just crying about how unfortable they are because of all the WACIST WHYTEEZ and left, presumably to to set shit on fire in Ft.Worth like an hour later.
ah yes burning down property and businesses that are most likely owned by minorities. but we're the racist ones. such a joke. what a bunch of clowns.
 
Back
Top