untamedmind
Virgin
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2025
- Posts
- 33
when you enable criminals to use violence against law abiding citizens who then are not allowed to defend and protect themselves, that is oppression.
Repeal the 2nd Amendment
- Thread starter BrightShinyGirl
- Start date
That retard calls it "progress".
What you are describing exists nowhere in the world. No government is "enabling" criminals in that way.
And nobody who fights for a loose immigration policy is doing that either.
In fact, the fantasy you are describing is EXACTLY how "The Turner Diaries" begins. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Turner_Diaries
And nobody who wants tight border control or immigration halts is racist in any way.
You know THAT'S a lie -- because immigration would not even be an issue of the immigrants were comong from Canada, and that is not because Canadians speak Engiish.
untamedmind
Virgin
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2025
- Posts
- 33
letting criminals with no bail/light sentences/repeat offenses back on the streets constantly with few consequences is enabling.
untamedmind
Virgin
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2025
- Posts
- 33
no the issue are people draining our systems. immigration law requires people to NOT be dependent on the government or tax payers just like many other country's immigration laws. race does not matter.
The U.S. has a higher percentage of its population in prison than any other country. Sentencing leniency is NOT a problem we have here.
Nope. Only what you siad was a lie.
untamedmind
Virgin
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2025
- Posts
- 33
well duh, that's because of population, and a gross moral decline that no one wants to admit or do anything about. AND because of enabling criminal behavior.
china and russia with their high population dont screw around when it comes to crime. they force consequences and do NOT enable criminal behavior. so a lot more people are law abiding.
Yea it is.
Start caining MF's publicly, teh bullshit stops.....they don't have these fuckin' problems in Singapore where you get fuckin' BEAT for defacing public property.
What do YOU think would happen, if there were immigration pressure at the northern border and none at the southern?
Copying Singapore is no constructive suggestion.
Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 7,353
China uses one bullet to the brain stem and then send the family a bill for the bullet.
Copying China is no constructive suggestion.
Saddam Hussein ruled an armed population. It never stopped him from doing whatever he wanted to them.An unarmed civilian population and an armed military works every time a despot wants to take over a country. But that's what the lefties here really want.
untamedmind
Virgin
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2025
- Posts
- 33
have you ever tried to drive in or out of canada? it is VERY strict. you answer one question weird and they'll pull you in.
theyve also arrested us citizens who were mistakenly hiking right at the border in the woods. so they can be strict with their border but we cant????
Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 7,353
From what I understand they aren't as strict as they used to be.
That has nothing at all to do with American racism and immigrants.
HumpDayHoratio
Slightly Aged
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2022
- Posts
- 8,716
Value you ask? Let’s look at the last line again…
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Notice…it’s very similar to the Fourth Amendment…
It means that citizens have the individual right to own firearms for lawful purposes and that the government may not interfere with that right.
The Fourth Amendment, uses similar language…
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”
It’s notable because it affirms that the Founding Fathers intended the Second Amendment to protect an individual right.
Heller references this similarity, and defines it as such.
If you’re so flippant about repealing the Second…when will you come for the First? Or the Fourth? It will only be a matter of time. As I posted (and both of you ignored), we already have Israeli Oligarchs calling for suspension of our First Amendment.
I’m sure both of you fully support him…
BrightShinyGirl
Abusive Little Bitch
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Posts
- 8,802
The primary reason to repeal the 2nd Amendment is because the “shall not be infringed” language has been exploited by bad actors.
It was a poorly-written addition to Constitution that serves no purpose in the 21st Century.
It is not about the language. It is simply that the freedom to keep and bear arms IS OF NO VALUE.
HumpDayHoratio
Slightly Aged
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2022
- Posts
- 8,716
Well, for one it wasn’t written in the 21st Century. The beauty is the Constitution was written by very smart men. It’s basically served us well for almost 250 yrs. You can complain, you wont be the first, that it was “poorly-written”, but as I’ve shown you with the Pennsylvania example, the Founders knew just of what they spoke.
It’s why those quotes from those 18th Century State Constitutions were used. This wasn’t some flippant Amendment that was thrown together last second…as you two jokesters would have us believe.
I have to ask…if your people had had something similar…would they have had the troubles they traditionally had? Something to ponder
HumpDayHoratio
Slightly Aged
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2022
- Posts
- 8,716
If it’s not about the language…
You’ve proven you don’t have the simplest grasp of the Founders and much less the constitution.
I know a LOT more than you do about THAT subject!
