"Racial Equality"

[SpeareChucker]

You hate gooks, redmen and a certain Korean... virtue signal again while trying to pretend not to be a racist.

We'll wait.

He hates himself.
It manifests in his overall hatred...




:shrug:

 

[toeskr]

He hates himself.
It manifests in his overall hatred...




:shrug:

Sadz. Even sadder that his other board buddies won't call him out while virtue signal posting.
Just kidding, actually funny, shows all their hypocrisy.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Why would they?

He has the temerity to say what they think.

Laurel, for example, is firmly in his corner; she's never seen his behavior.



I've asked her about it...

 

[toeskr]

Why would they?

He has the temerity to say what they think.

Laurel, for example, is firmly in his corner; she's never seen his behavior.



I've asked her about it...

Silence is violence... so some say. Sounds like a one way street.

 

[surdeep]

Exactly what laws do you believe should be enacted to achieve that goal? Be specific and be prepared to defend your suggestion.

Police just need to enforce Murphy’s Law.

 

[SpeareChucker]

It always has been here.


A real Google-festival...

 

[bellisarius]

Most of the allegations of "blacks being inordinately effected" are based on a false narrative. If you compare the percentages to the rest of the population you are left with the impression that blacks are being singled out. However if you compare the instances to the crime rate by race the number line up quite well. As a matter of fact in some instances you can make the case that it is the rest of the population that is being "picked on."

 

[colddiesel]

So let's talk about the hard part. Exactly what laws do you believe should be enacted to achieve that goal? Be specific and be prepared to defend your suggestion.

No laws needed. Invite a blackfella for Sunday lunch. Share your best scotch with him. Then after lunch tell your wife or daughter they can give your guest a BJ. The ladies can choose who does the BJ, 'cos feminism.

It'd stand as much chance as most suggestions.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Why would they?

He has the temerity to say what they think.

Laurel, for example, is firmly in his corner; she's never seen his behavior.



I've asked her about it...

You have asked Laurel, Housesquaw?

By all means then, tell us what she replied?

Did she remind you that you can dish it out but you can't take it?
Did she explain to you once again that "freedom of speech" does not imply "freedom from criticism"?
Did she tell you if you can't stand the heat stay out of the kitchen?
Or did she simply remind you that Rob posts in accordance with forum guidelines, while you, Conager, BananaBoy and Busybody do not, hence you guys get banhammered regularly and Rob has 18 years of continuous posting with the same userid?

 

[FlowersForFun]

I answered the question.......

Now FOAD.

Seriously FOAD

You deflected to boo hoo's about inequity.

So no, you didn't answer the question....you used the question as a soapbox to put your socialist trash up again.

Which browser are you using?

Mine shows me lots of people protesting to keep cops from killing people.

Here are some suggestions to help keep cops from killing people, if that’s what you want to discuss.

• Ban chokeholds.
• Require de-escalation.
• Require warning before shooting.
• Exhaust all other means before shooting.
• Require intervention when excessive force is seen.
• Ban shooting at moving vehicles.
• Set rules for response to resistance.
• Require reports for every use of force or threat of force.

LOL!!! Phro thinks this is about police brutality...that's cute.

He hates himself.
It manifests in his overall hatred...

:shrug:

It's fucking delicious

Silence is violence... so some say. Sounds like a one way street.

It is a one way street.

Brown working class immigrant in a MAGA hat? They'll beat that guy into the ICU and cheer it as social justice.

A white guy defends his homem/family/buisness from the same mob? They're "white nationalist" reich wing extremist who murdered INNOCENT protesters who just want equality!!

There are a lot of Robs in the world, they're running a numbe of cities/states right now. I hope your town/county isn't run by Democrats or you're probably living under a double standard.

 

[Rightguide]

Most of the allegations of "blacks being inordinately effected" are based on a false narrative. If you compare the percentages to the rest of the population you are left with the impression that blacks are being singled out. However if you compare the instances to the crime rate by race the number line up quite well. As a matter of fact in some instances you can make the case that it is the rest of the population that is being "picked on."

What rights do I have that they don't have?

 

[FlowersForFun]

What rights do I have that they don't have?

What laws do they have to live by that you don't??

 

[Lazaran]

The OPs question has been answered.

Change the laws as recommended in progressive liberal platforms and reduce poverty. Black and brown people are disproportionately poor, so changes in those laws would automatically be weighted to help black and brown people more han white people, though they would still help poor white people.

Poverty leads to desperation, which leads to criminal behavior, which leads to police contact, which leads to increased potential for a violent confrontation because the poor person is already desperate.

Why do you think poor people often try to run from the police or resist arrest??

When you have enough money and lawyers, being arrested for a DUI or other fairly small crime isn't that big of a deal, but when you're poor it seems like the end of the world.

Others have specifically answered the policing laws that could be changed.

Of course you just rationalized them away.

All righties are just Sea Lions who ask questions but never seriously intend to thoughtfully consider the answers and be open to adopting some of the solutions offered.

All righties can FOAD

Seriously FOAD

 

[FlowersForFun]

The OPs question has been answered.

No, it hasn't because equality =/= equity.

Change the laws as recommended in progressive liberal platforms and reduce poverty.

Black and brown people are disproportionately poor, so changes in those laws would automatically be weighted to help black and brown people more han white people, though they would still help poor white people.

Poverty leads to desperation, which leads to criminal behavior, which leads to police contact, which leads to increased potential for a violent confrontation because the poor person is already desperate.

Why do you think poor people often try to run from the police or resist arrest??

When you have enough money and lawyers, being arrested for a DUI or other fairly small crime isn't that big of a deal, but when you're poor it seems like the end of the world.

Others have specifically answered the policing laws that could be changed.

Of course you just rationalized them away.

All righties are just Sea Lions who ask questions but never seriously intend to thoughtfully consider the answers and be open to adopting some of the solutions offered.

All righties can FOAD

Seriously FOAD

1) Can't be liberal and progressive....those ideologies are directly opposed to one another. "Progressiveism" is inherently authoritarian.

2) equality =/= equity....no matter how much you try to conflate the two.


You can keep ignoring those two FACTS, but you're just making yourself look dumb.

 

[Lazaran]

Democratic progressivism is far less authoritarian than corporate capitalism, which buys corrupt politicians to write laws that entrench the GROSS overcompensation of individuals, and is backed by a militarized police force that defends the GROSSLY overcompensated.

Money = power, power = authority.

When just a handful of individuals have the power and authority, you no longer have a democracy.

It isn't that complicated.

 

[bellisarius]

No, it hasn't because equality =/= equity.



1) Can't be liberal and progressive....those ideologies are directly opposed to one another. "Progressiveism" is inherently authoritarian.

2) equality =/= equity....no matter how much you try to conflate the two.


You can keep ignoring those two FACTS, but you're just making yourself look dumb.

Apparently it can ignore those two facts.

 

[Conager]

Democratic progressivism is far less authoritarian than corporate capitalism, which buys corrupt politicians to write laws that entrench the GROSS overcompensation of individuals, and is backed by a militarized police force that defends the GROSSLY overcompensated.

Money = power, power = authority.

When just a handful of individuals have the power and authority, you no longer have a democracy.

It is t that complicated.

Good thing we have the US Constitution and are ruled by laws and not the "democracy" that you authoritarians would prefer.

 

[Lazaran]

Good thing we have the US Constitution and are ruled by laws and not the "democracy" that you authoritarians would prefer.

I can respect the fact that you just admitted the status quo is based on corporate capitalism buying corrupt politicians and being backed by a militarized police force.

Honesty from a righty is quite refreshing.

Fortunately the constitution can be amended to address changing demographics and sensibilities relating to social justice.

It's no wonder you and your ilk are pissing yourselves at the moment.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Most of the allegations of "blacks being inordinately effected" are based on a false narrative. If you compare the percentages to the rest of the population you are left with the impression that blacks are being singled out. However if you compare the instances to the crime rate by race the number line up quite well. As a matter of fact in some instances you can make the case that it is the rest of the population that is being "picked on."

LOL...Ishmael has wants to use absolute numbers not ratios or percentages because the latter two don't support his "Whites are teh REAL victims here" narrative.

 

[FlowersForFun]

Democratic progressivism is far less authoritarian than corporate capitalism,

That must be why Democratic progressiveness requires so much state control over the means of production and distribution of goods an services under direct threat of violence from the state.

And corporate capitalism only needs minimal government control.

Capitalism is the economic system of liberalism. The more free or open the market economy? The more liberal.

Progressivism is not at all about liberty, it's entirely about control....you can't have a single bit of "progress" without the state putting a gun to everyone's head and forcing compliance. That's what makes it authoritarian.

which buys corrupt politicians to write laws that entrench the GROSS overcompensation of individuals, and is backed by a militarized police force that defends the GROSSLY overcompensated.

Money = power, power = authority.

When just a handful of individuals have the power and authority, you no longer have a democracy.

It is t that complicated.

No, force = violence, and violence is the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived.

The government has an absolute monopoly on the use of force, under the law.


What you're talking about is corruption.

Corruption knows no system or party, it is a naturally occurring result of authoritarianism and why socialism has failed miserably every time it's been tried.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely and all that....and even if you have a genuine good leader at first? It's just a matter of time before a Stalin, Mao or Kim takes charge and all that authority goes to their head.

Thus the concept of liberalism.....by not giving the state the authority to abuse you in the first place or in the case of the US Bill of Rights, explicitly prohibiting specific abuses of authority.

Authority the left wing is DESPERATE for and needs to have the "progress" it's talking about, because "progressiveism" is inherently authoritarian and illiberal.

 

[FlowersForFun]

I can respect the fact that you just admitted the status quo is based on corporate capitalism buying corrupt politicians and being backed by a militarized police force.

Honesty from a righty is quite refreshing.

Fortunately the constitution can be amended to address changing demographics and sensibilities relating to social justice.

What "social justice" ??? Exactly......

 

[Rightguide]

What laws do they have to live by that you don't??

Amazing, Isn't it?

 

[FlowersForFun]

Amazing, Isn't it?

https://data.whicdn.com/images/70943228/original.gif

 

[RobDownSouth]

What laws do they have to live by that you don't??

hurr durr! hurr durr! hurr durr!

So when de jure segregation was outlawed, de facto segregation went away as well? Who knew?

 

[icanhelp1]

I can respect the fact that you just admitted the status quo is based on corporate capitalism buying corrupt politicians and being backed by a militarized police force.

Honesty from a righty is quite refreshing.

Fortunately the constitution can be amended to address changing demographics and sensibilities relating to social justice.

It's no wonder you and your ilk are pissing yourselves at the moment.

If personal wealth is accrued legally then who the fuck has the right to impede that process, that's wealth redistribution. It's the progressive ideology that is putting a damper on capitalism, it's been trying for decades to create a dependent on government society. Why can't progressives give educational vouchers to urban families and let mom and dads put their children in a school of their choice, why? because the teacher's union says no. Who governs the teachers union, wait for it!!
PROGRESSIVES and blue leadership.