Mr. Speaker! We Need To Get Back To Benghazi

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

You are getting Once-ler-level annoying.

That's a lot of annoying.

Be nice.

RealJuvenile Thoughts isn't aware that Obama is the Commander in Chief, and would have made the ultimate decision to "stand down."

Is it just me or is Obama only in charge of the military when it makes him look bad? Maybe I'm wrong and two years ago Vette was praising Obama's brave move to send troops into Pakistan to get Osama but and someone correct me if I'm wrong. . .wasn't that proof that Obama wasn't in charge and just kinda rubber stamps what the military is already planning on doing? I'm just losing track of things.

 

[RjThoughts]

I wonder if Vette knows I have him on ignore, for many reasons, but one of them is I'm tired of him disgracing any uniform he wore by calling me names when I've touched a nerve or have shown him facts that disagree with his "knowledge".

 

[Busybody]

I wonder if Vette knows I have him on ignore, for many reasons, but one of them is I'm tired of him disgracing any uniform he wore by calling me names when I've touched a nerve or have shown him facts that disagree with his "knowledge".

STFU, sanctimonious asshole

yes, Im on IGGY

cause this PROOF READER is a piece of shit

 

[Sean Renaud]

I wonder if Vette knows I have him on ignore, for many reasons, but one of them is I'm tired of him disgracing any uniform he wore by calling me names when I've touched a nerve or have shown him facts that disagree with his "knowledge".

Unless you announced it prior to now probably not. The only reason people I have on ignore know is because they are either on nearly every ignore or they're Bot and I'm trying to get the rest of you people to iggy him or at least stop quoting him but apparently that's too much to ask.

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

You are getting Once-ler-level annoying.

That's a lot of annoying.

He's right, though.

And he smacks some good bitch slap in the Shitstain Derpsquawk Consortium® here. A-OK with me.

Is it just me or is Obama only in charge of the military when it makes him look bad? Maybe I'm wrong and two years ago Vette was praising Obama's brave move to send troops into Pakistan to get Osama but and someone correct me if I'm wrong. . .wasn't that proof that Obama wasn't in charge and just kinda rubber stamps what the military is already planning on doing? I'm just losing track of things.

President Obama had nothing to do with killing Osama bin Laden, but now he has everything to do with Benghoozi.

 

[Sean Renaud]

He's right, though.

And he smacks some good bitch slap in the Shitstain Derpsquawk Consortium® here. A-OK with me.



President Obama had nothing to do with killing Osama bin Laden, but now he has everything to do with Benghoozi.

He may very well be right. Once is the only person the internet to hear me go "oh how I wish I had a picture" and them to reply "o rly, your wish is my command." What can I say I might be a jack ass but I'm not ungrateful or anything.

I know he had nothing to do with the killing of Osama Bin Laden and everything to do with Benghazi I'm just trying to figure out how exactly that works and nobody will explain it to me.

 

[landslider2000]

The assumption that Fox had anything to do with Sean Smith's mother's remarks is absurd.

I heard about it on CNN, which tilts to the Left.

Any politician who would lie to a grieving mother, as Obama and Hilly and Rice apparently did, is low.

 

[Busybody]

The assumption that Fox had anything to do with Sean Smith's mother's remarks is absurd.

.

don't be silly

we ALL know the truth

the other side has GOUGED out their eyes,

so they cant see

 

[IrezumiKiss]

He may very well be right. Once is the only person the internet to hear me go "oh how I wish I had a picture" and them to reply "o rly, your wish is my command." What can I say I might be a jack ass but I'm not ungrateful or anything.

I know he had nothing to do with the killing of Osama Bin Laden and everything to do with Benghazi I'm just trying to figure out how exactly that works and nobody will explain it to me.

Those magical secret muslim powers are something else.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdi3akdjOn1rncdgao1_500.gif

 

[Sean Renaud]

The assumption that Fox had anything to do with Sean Smith's mother's remarks is absurd.

I heard about it on CNN, which tilts to the Left.

Any politician who would lie to a grieving mother, as Obama and Hilly and Rice apparently did, is low.

While I don't believe her, lets give you the benefit of the doubt. Their low. What would you have us do?

 

[landslider2000]

Obama, Rice, and Hilly have not said that Sean Smith's mother was being dishonest.

What does any sentient human do with info?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

http://24.media.tumblr.com/e433633dd75a014d9db4edb54d774c32/tumblr_mnma93N3331ql10y6o1_500.jpg

Fox News tried to drag national security adviser Tom Donilon into the manufactured Benghazi scandal.

But if they wanted to know where he was, they just had to look at their own screen.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/05/30/fox-drags-another-obama-official-into-manufactu/194266

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7xqlxK7Dm1rcz0llo1_500.gif

 

[Sean Renaud]

Obama, Rice, and Hilly have not said that Sean Smith's mother was being dishonest.

What does any sentient human do with info?

Obama, Hilly and Rice have a habit of not commenting on things that are beneath them.

Again, what would you have us do?

A sentient human chalks it up as them being dishonest and moves right along.

 

[landslider2000]

The death of the folks defending the Benghazi outpost was certainly not "beneath" Obama, Rice, and Hilly. Ask not for whom the bell...

Had what the mother said been incorrect, they would have protested quite audibly.

 

[RjThoughts]

The death of the folks defending the Benghazi outpost was certainly not "beneath" Obama, Rice, and Hilly. Ask not for whom the bell...

Had what the mother said been incorrect, they would have protested quite audibly.

the deaths are not beneath them. These hearings are!! These "hearings" have now morphed from actual information gathering to a witch hunt, to either find impeachable offences by the president, or failing at that, discrediting Hillary Clinton for her 2016 run.

 

[Sean Renaud]

The death of the folks defending the Benghazi outpost was certainly not "beneath" Obama, Rice, and Hilly. Ask not for whom the bell...

Had what the mother said been incorrect, they would have protested quite audibly.

As RJ put it more accurately. The hearings/accusations are beneath them.

What makes you say that they would have protested quite audibly? They claimed this was an act of terrorism within 24 hours but they've been pretty quiet on that front. Deficit is down, the silence is deafening. Nobody in this administration is the get out and make noise type for better or worse that's now who they are.

 

[dan_c00000]

He's right, though.

And he smacks some good bitch slap in the Shitstain Derpsquawk Consortium® here. A-OK with me.



President Obama had nothing to do with killing Osama bin Laden, but now he has everything to do with Benghoozi.

Thanks I try!

Add to you list that Bush II had nothing to do with any illegal wars, government bailouts, tanking economies, terrible education choices, destroying $6 billion worth of surplus money, and making the U.S. the most hated nation on Earth.

That seems like a fair starting point to judge how well Obama has done.

I wonder if Vette knows I have him on ignore, for many reasons, but one of them is I'm tired of him disgracing any uniform he wore by calling me names when I've touched a nerve or have shown him facts that disagree with his "knowledge".

The only uniform vette every wore was the time he dressed up as a janitor for Halloween.

 

[landslider2000]

The Obama approach is endless campaign, with no allegation against remaining unrebutted.

CNN, NBC, et al. did not question the factual accuracy of Smith's claim.

 

[Sean Renaud]

The Obama approach is endless campaign, with no allegation against remaining unrebutted.

CNN, NBC, et al. did not question the factual accuracy of Smith's claim.

Perhapd in Dreamland he's been in campaign mode without being rebutted. I wish I lived there, it sounds like a nice place.

Lets say Smith's claim is accurate. WHAT NOW?! Why won't you answer that simple question?

 

[RobDownSouth]

The Obama approach is endless campaign,

Since President Obama is constitutionally barred from seeking a third term, perhaps you'll tell us what office he's campaigning for now?

with no allegation against remaining unrebutted.

How dare he refudiate the baseless claims of Fox News and teh outrage machine!

CNN, NBC, et al. did not question the factual accuracy of Smith's claim.

And what if they did? It becomes her word against the President's word, which cannot be proven or disproven one way or the other. In this instance, only Fox News wins.

 

[mercury14]

The Obama approach is endless campaign.

Obama takes his case to the American people in order to explain his ideas and generate support. That doesn't mean he's campaigning for office. If means he's tired of bullshit Republican filibuster abuse so he changes tactics. Conservatives just don't like it and willfully mis-characterize it as "campaigning" since Obama tends to be pretty good at talking to big crowds.

"Hey America, 90% of us back the contents of this background check bill. Call your congressman and let's get this passed!"


...That's what Republicans falsely call "campaigning". Basically whenever America supports Obama on an issue and Obama talks to people about it, conservatives say it's a bad thing to do.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

the deaths are not beneath them. These hearings are!! These "hearings" have now morphed from actual information gathering to a witch hunt, to either find impeachable offences by the president, or failing at that, discrediting Hillary Clinton for her 2016 run.

That is a purely partisan sentiment because, much like in the IRS case, the players in this drama who are stage Left have come to learn over the course of five years that the press has given them a blank immunity from actually giving answers to questions that are uncomfortable to the Left. It is your perception that it is a witch hunt, but it is not mine for several disturbing trends are at work in both of these cases, not to mention Treyvon Martin and Dr. Gosnell, or to go back a little bit, Dr. Gosnell.

If we learned nothing from the Scooter Libby incident, it is that reporters salivate over the thought of getting Republicans, fact-finding to the nth degree and speaking truth to power, but when their party does it (and survey after survey has shown that especially the national press votes 90% Democratic) then they tend to go after those who wish to report the truth, find the facts, and hold power accountable.

If this were George W. Bush, most of you would be screaming bloody murder about plastic turkeys and banners with messages, real important shit that got no one killed or sent the clear and totally understandable message to those at war with us, we are not at war with you, we are at war with ourselves.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Like Watergate, Benghazi has several layers. But the most revealing one is the active collusion between this administration and Al Qaida.

Al Qaida is a Saudi-inspired and Saudi-funded terror gang. Almost all of the terrorists on 9/11 were Saudis. Those facts are always covered up, but they are crucial to understanding the Jihad War.

In Benghazi we ran arms from Libya to Al Qaida rebels in Syria. The Saudis are funding that rebellion.

There's that Saudi link again.

In Egypt we backed the Muslim Brotherhood against Hosni Mubarak, who kept the peace treaty with Israel for 30 years. Thirty years of peace in the Middle East is a huge achievement. The Muslim Brotherhood assassinated Anwar Sadat the peacemaker, one of the rare Arab moderates who saw the light. Today we are in league with those who assassinated Anwar Sadat. For shame.

Today Egypt is starving, and the people hate the new regime.

The Saudis are naturally on the side of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood because they share the Sunni war theology.

So the Saudis have won again, with Obama acting as their American errand boy.

In Libya, we again made common cause with Sunni radicals against Muammar Gadaffi, a real nutcase, but a man who was able to run Libya's tribal federation for years. Gadaffi had turned over his nuclear program to the George W. Bush Administration. We still betrayed him to support his enemies, and Libya is in a civil war even now.

Again, the Muslim radicals won.

The bottom line is that Obama has consistently supported the most radical Muslim elements in the Middle East.

And now, he wants to arm al Qaeda in Syria at the same time he is droning the Taliban leadership in the middle of Peace negotiations!

That is what Benghazi was, like Fast&Furious, another gun-running operation.

http://www.americanthinker.com/prin...enghazi_revealed_collusion_with_al_qaida.html