James G 5
Holding Lit together
- Joined
- May 16, 2002
- Posts
- 12,586
Aaron Dazer said:I’d like to say I’m sorry for those who may have felt insulted or attacked by my posting. I'm sorry you can't differentiate between an intelligent Health Debate and Being Judgmental. I take it those who chose to state I’m being insulting and Judgmental can’t rebuttal my Statements. I didn’t just stand out and attack anyone and any aggression I imposed was in defense.
As far as being Judgmental I’m not so inclined. This is a Thread with a Moral and Personal topic. Joining in debating that isn’t Being Judgmental. If anything I’m passionate about Monogamy and believe Polyanything is against the good practice of Commitment and Loyalty by hiding behind a Verbal Commitment. When I feel with very very rare exception poloanything is just another form of waiting for something better to come along with out the tossing of the first asset. Yes as said before Commitment it self isn’t constrained to two persons. I’m using commitment in a different form here. One can commitment to not being committed which IMO isn’t commitment.
And I’m glade we got Definitions out, cleared some of my own ignorance as I’m sure it did many others. For this reason I’ll clarify some of my before mentioned points.
In using ReadyOne definitions
Polygamous/Polyandry: Being in a cultural or religion that accepts the practice of multiple wives/husbands isn’t what I considered in many of my arguments this is a wholly different topic. However I feel this is an ancient outdated from of culture that doesn’t have an acceptable place in a modern Developed world. Most if not all Developed nations have laws forbidding it.
Polyamory – IMO is an escape from true commitment. Entering a relationship and saying I’m going to have sex with others, swing etc.. lacks the Fundamental Values a Healthy good relationship needs. It’s a joining of sexual retaliations and not giving your self to one completely which IMO is a prerequisite for being in love. If a group of people have a strong friendship along with a sexual attraction it’s not being In Love. It’s loving each other and having sex as well. Thought this relationship could be virtuous it’s selling your self short of the next step of full unity.
Being in a Monogamist relationship and years later choosing or deciding your now Polly is failing at the previous relationship. with the exception of terminating that one and establishing a new one with different Partners who enter the new one with Commitment to the new life style.
People in a Polylifestyle of any befor-mentioned ideas in no way Threaten me. I feel they are selling themselves short and fear surrendering to love.
Man, you STILL don't get it...Poly is NOT running around & doing a lot of different people, looking for the "next best thing"
Poly CAN include open relationships, but it can also include committed GROUPS of 3 or more
Verbal commitments are used because there's no legal option for other sorts of comittments
That's like the argument used by anti-gay crusaders for years of saying they didn't commit to relationships...and then turning around & fighting allowing them to marry
And there's a limit to reasoned debate when you put people in derogatory categories, continually mix up ideas even when people explain you're not seeing sides of things, and start throwing in assertions about God decreeing certain things