Lootequiette: Pmann's Totally Original/Unaffiliated Thread

how trusting are you? Once it's gone is it gone for good? How do you navigate lit regarding trust? Do you have walls up initially? Or does everyone get a clean slate? If it's broken, are they allowed back in?

While I'm a trustworthy person, I'm actually not very trusting at all. I can be a very cynical person and it takes a lot for me to trust. My walls are high and thick from the get-go.

There are very few who have breached those walls and, as far as Lit goes, there are only 2 people I trust completely - with anything and without hesitation. If I do trust you and you break that trust, you'll be forgiven, but the trust is likely gone for good. Like yesterday's question, it all depends on who you are.

As for trusting men more than women...yeah...kind of agree. Men might try to use your trust to get in your pants, but they are pretty forward about that. Women on the other hand can be catty and conniving.
 
I almost always automatically distrust anyone who says "trust me". (Hi president Trump lol). It usually means they are full of crap but want you to buy their crap without any resistance. I am very skeptical of people who use that phrase.

I am very trustworthy myself though. Trust me, I really am.
 
I almost always automatically distrust anyone who says "trust me". (Hi president Trump lol). It usually means they are full of crap but want you to buy their crap without any resistance. I am very skeptical of people who use that phrase.

I am very trustworthy myself though. Trust me, I really am.

Yeah...well...I don't trust you either! ;)
 
hmmm. . i like this topic.
as no one facet works for all. and where there is a bottom line.
there are many paths to it and the top shelf. thus, what is ' Trust '.some i cant lend my tools to, but! i can trust them to pick me up on time! and some, i can not, not give any info to. but lend them money and get it all back.!

but as many have said, it Takes time to get to kno some one! then by your own standards. how and when and how far you willl let them in.
but thats just me, cause i have a date. from the day i say hello, to when i see you as a friend.
 
I wanted to stop by and wish Pmann all the best here. I’m all about inclusion and opportunity so if this thread attracts those that wouldn’t be in Litiquette VII that’s a good thing.

And not to worry this is not the first question of the day threads that have sprung up since the original Litiquette, and I doubt Litiquette was an original concept.

So in the spirit of Pmann, I will ask this:

How small would cock have to be before you said, nope, not worth my time. I mean we all know size doesn’t matter and yet we know it does.....enjoy!
 
So in the spirit of Pmann, I will ask this:

How small would cock have to be before you said, nope, not worth my time. I mean we all know size doesn’t matter and yet we know it does.....enjoy!

I like soup. So if you can't make a decent stock from it...why bother?
 
Trust. It comes hard at first. But if you reach a point, it is probably given too quickly because it feels good to have that one person you can trust completely with anything. Once trust is violated...it is impossible to let go. Right or wrong...this is the only reason relationships fail.
 
I wanted to stop by and wish Pmann all the best here. I’m all about inclusion and opportunity so if this thread attracts those that wouldn’t be in Litiquette VII that’s a good thing.

And not to worry this is not the first question of the day threads that have sprung up since the original Litiquette, and I doubt Litiquette was an original concept.

So in the spirit of Pmann, I will ask this:

How small would cock have to be before you said, nope, not worth my time. I mean we all know size doesn’t matter and yet we know it does.....enjoy!

I guess I don’t understand the question. What’s not worth your time? Coming and responding to my thread? You left out a pronoun, perhaps, regarding cock size. Do you mean how small would MY cock have to be? Or your cock? Or any cocks in general? But let’s roll with Papa C’s question.

Does size matter?

I don’t really know if girls care about size. I just have an average white man dick. Nothing special in terms of size. I think for anything other than a one night stand or just a FWB hookup, it would become less important.

Like, I’m trying to think of the other side of it... I mean, I don’t like a big vagina. But if I really liked the girl, we dated and she ended up having a big vagina, I’d still think of her fondly, even for an ex.
 
Well thankfully we have only forgiving people here. Except AGG, who is inherently evil it seems.

Trust is something that can come and go. And the weird thing is, sometimes you're not quite sure how much you trust someone... Until it's gone. Then it's really obvious how much you trusted them and how much trust was lost.

Lit is a particularly hard place to trust people. It can prey on your vulnerabilities. It can cause you to doubt yourself.

The questions are- how trusting are you? Once it's gone is it gone for good? How do you navigate lit regarding trust? Do you have walls up initially? Or does everyone get a clean slate? If it's broken, are they allowed back in?

Don't Know What You Got (Til It's Gone) by Cinderella

https://youtu.be/i28UEoLXVFQ

Trust is hard to quantify for me. In some ways, I am very open and highly trusting. Many would think too much so with the way I interact with the world and risks I take with people. The reality, though, is it is more an illusion of trust. The violation of trust, and trust itself, is an expectation of specific behaviors placed on another party, and whether they meet those expectations or not. I try very hard to not place expectations on anyone but myself. I am not trusting that you will behave in a certain way, I am trusting those behaviors will not matter to me and I can mitigate them as needed. Most of the common things that others view as violations of trust have little meaning to me.

That said there are a few things I keep really close to my vest. Lit, for example, while I share and talk with people often about almost everything, I can think of one thing I have only told one person. It seems completely mundane, so why wouldn't I share? There are people who know my real name, my address, my history, etc. The reason some small mundane details aren't shared is I think if it was twisted to be used as ammunition against me, it would hurt. Here, not only do people who know each other and don't get along attack each other, but people who you have never spoken to and don't know from Adam will fire away also. It can be your age, your weight, your children, your competency as a mother, your health, and anything in between. Everything is fair game to some. Either way, whether I know them or not, it is just odd, ineffectual, and often completely lacking in basic competency, which is humorous, and not a violation of trust, as I never placed the expectation that this wouldn't happen. To actually know and understand the little things that truly matter to me, well, that takes climbing some fences, with barbed wire, that is electrified, then a moat, with alligators, etc. As for gaining it back, I am not sure, it is rare to make it there at all. I don't think one can exit once there.

I wanted to stop by and wish Pmann all the best here. I’m all about inclusion and opportunity so if this thread attracts those that wouldn’t be in Litiquette VII that’s a good thing.

And not to worry this is not the first question of the day threads that have sprung up since the original Litiquette, and I doubt Litiquette was an original concept.

So in the spirit of Pmann, I will ask this:

How small would cock have to be before you said, nope, not worth my time. I mean we all know size doesn’t matter and yet we know it does.....enjoy!


Well, this has never happened to me in my life and I have seen a few cocks in my day. (as some men around America fall out of their chair laughing at my use of "few", cough cough slut cough) I looked at my handy tape measure as I can't parallel park, and I believe there would likely not be a second evening with a man with an erect penis below 4 inches in length or below a 3 inch circumference. Yeah, I am shallow like that, but this is significantly below average and smaller than anything I have ever come across in person with an erect penis.
 
What about those of us who have a very wide dick, but it’s flat, like a beaver tail? I’ve expressed my beaver tail dick shaped woes before. Sigh.

It is all about how that beaver tail can slap...you should know this
 
The questions are- how trusting are you? Once it's gone is it gone for good? How do you navigate lit regarding trust? Do you have walls up initially? Or does everyone get a clean slate? If it's broken, are they allowed back in?
I don't trust people until they prove themselves to be trustworthy. And if someone tells me that they're trustworthy, they are automatically in the not trustworthy category.

Actions mean a lot to me.

How small would cock have to be before you said, nope, not worth my time. I mean we all know size doesn’t matter and yet we know it does.....enjoy!

I know it when I see it. And yes, it does matter. It isn't the end all, be all - but it matters.
 
It’s like saying, “I’m not a rapist.”

Is there anything more rapey sounding than that?

That’s because you have to follow it up with “trust me”, duh.

I have no response to the small cock question, but I may have to look up any scientific research on the subject and post the data in the Cock Map thread.

So Chained asks a question in Pmann’s thread that leads to a post in Cock Map. This is a three-way crossover post! Must be sweeps week.
 
Happy Sunday, everyone. I hope everyone is having a nice day of rest. Unless you’re Jewish. Then that was yesterday for you. So get back to work.

Anyway, today’s question is about discourse. The time we live in with social media apps like Facebook and Twitter have opened up the floodgates for a LOT of debate. I mean, consider just 15 years ago before these things existed. You had Internet forums, but that is usually not a group of people you know. And 25 years ago, a platform for debate was virtually non-existent.

Today, with all that is going on in the world, we are exposed to hundreds, of not thousands,of opinions every day. Some informed. MANY uninformed. We see the political opinions of our friends and family on the daily. We hear what they think about coronavirus or this or that.

The question is, do you think that’s a good thing? Is it good that we now have the ability to see other points of view like this? Or does it give a platform for the ignorant and uninformed? How much influence does it have?

Please do try to keep this apolitical. It is nice when people open up. But something about politics causes an extreme polarization. And, we’re all friends here, so let’s keep specific politics at bay. The topic is okay, but please avoid specific comments pro or against political parties or candidates.

That’s All by Genesis

https://youtu.be/Vzyn60Zns-E
 
Happy Sunday, everyone. I hope everyone is having a nice day of rest. Unless you’re Jewish. Then that was yesterday for you. So get back to work.

Anyway, today’s question is about discourse. The time we live in with social media apps like Facebook and Twitter have opened up the floodgates for a LOT of debate. I mean, consider just 15 years ago before these things existed. You had Internet forums, but that is usually not a group of people you know. And 25 years ago, a platform for debate was virtually non-existent.

Today, with all that is going on in the world, we are exposed to hundreds, of not thousands,of opinions every day. Some informed. MANY uninformed. We see the political opinions of our friends and family on the daily. We hear what they think about coronavirus or this or that.

The question is, do you think that’s a good thing? Is it good that we now have the ability to see other points of view like this? Or does it give a platform for the ignorant and uninformed? How much influence does it have?

Please do try to keep this apolitical. It is nice when people open up. But something about politics causes an extreme polarization. And, we’re all friends here, so let’s keep specific politics at bay. The topic is okay, but please avoid specific comments pro or against political parties or candidates.

That’s All by Genesis

https://youtu.be/Vzyn60Zns-E

I have big thoughts about this. Great question. I need to collate my ideas into something nominally coherent and will post later.
 
No...it is not a good thing. Too many sheep. Too many ignorant masses.

I imagine the hatred our country experienced during the Civil War is very much similar to what we have now. Just without violence. But that will change. Our "Troubles" are coming. How can this ever be considered a good thing?

People will say our issues existed before social media. That is true. But since social media, has it gotten better? Or worse?

They say guns don't kill people...people kill people. Yet why does anyone need a gun capable of killing hundreds within minutes? Same is true with social media. It isn't the issue...but it is the gun. The platform.

I don't have all the answers. But I know we are hurting as a country, and those people we elect, don't give a shit. So who do you blame? Those elected? Or those doing the electing? I blame those doing the electing...and where do they get their false lies from?
 
Happy Sunday, everyone. I hope everyone is having a nice day of rest. Unless you’re Jewish. Then that was yesterday for you. So get back to work.

Anyway, today’s question is about discourse. The time we live in with social media apps like Facebook and Twitter have opened up the floodgates for a LOT of debate. I mean, consider just 15 years ago before these things existed. You had Internet forums, but that is usually not a group of people you know. And 25 years ago, a platform for debate was virtually non-existent.

Today, with all that is going on in the world, we are exposed to hundreds, of not thousands,of opinions every day. Some informed. MANY uninformed. We see the political opinions of our friends and family on the daily. We hear what they think about coronavirus or this or that.

The question is, do you think that’s a good thing? Is it good that we now have the ability to see other points of view like this? Or does it give a platform for the ignorant and uninformed? How much influence does it have?

Please do try to keep this apolitical. It is nice when people open up. But something about politics causes an extreme polarization. And, we’re all friends here, so let’s keep specific politics at bay. The topic is okay, but please avoid specific comments pro or against political parties or candidates.

That’s All by Genesis

https://youtu.be/Vzyn60Zns-E

It is both a blessing and a curse, which leaves me torn on answering the question. It provides a simple way to keep in touch and see what is happening with those in my life but not physically. It gives people of all walks of life a voice. It enables someone to ask for help. It allows me to see the causes those in my life support while it provides a fundraising opportunity. It lets me see what others find meaning in. It enables work from home options for the disabled or just the mom with a house full of children. It enables me to see a point of view or topic I may not have even noticed. It enables me to learn new skills as others demonstrate their likes, hobbies, and how they achieve their results. It is also filled with lies, delusions, and propaganda. It spreads jealousy, hate, and stupidity.

My answer today is the negatives outweigh the benefits. However, current climate weighs into my decision. Asking me the question when it is filled with death, rioting, and insane political propaganda weighs in tremendously. Ask me the question the day social media finds my neighbors missing child, helps a friend get her life back together after her home burns, finally teaches me how to fold a fitted sheet in a way that works, finds the perfect home for the dog whose owner died, provides support for someone painfully depressed, shows me an interesting topic I knew nothing about, puts me in touch with my best friend for a week at summer camp when I was 5, and saves a life by spotting a health or safety issue and you will get a different answer. I would love to see the world in black and white. I even attempt to give myself a few black and white rules to live by. However, I see so much gray so much of the time, and sometimes I have to just go with my heart. The benefit versus harm debate of social media is one of those times, and my feelings will change based on the current environment that I am in and what I am witnessing. Today, I am not seeing much positive.
 
The question is, do you think that’s a good thing? Is it good that we now have the ability to see other points of view like this? Or does it give a platform for the ignorant and uninformed? How much influence does it have?

The ability for more view points to be seen and heard is a good thing.

Freedom of opinion and expression is a cornerstone of a democratic society. It is indispensable in the formation of public opinion and creates the means for the community to be sufficiently informed. A platform to help further an informed society, no matter the opinion expressed, is a step in the right direction.

I’m fully aware that this also provides a platform for ignorance. However I would argue that it’s equally ignorant to believe anything you read and hear without doing your own due diligence. Fake news sucks but it’s our responsibility to filter it for ourselves. We can all say it influences the masses too much, but that all depends on what side of the opinion you’re on.

Also...good song choice today 👍
 
Last edited:
Back
Top