And when she finds like 3-5 that don’t match the records, she will attempt to make that something more than it is. Errors can happen, the civil servants try their hardest to double and triple check things.And yet this judge is letting the suit go forward. Unlike the other judge who smacked the lawyers for contempt for just filing the suit.
All Lake is asking for is access to the data to see if there were votes actually counted which shouldn't have been counted. This is based on affidavits from witnesses she possesses. Affidavits which, by the way, comprise that thing called "evidence." Something which you claim she doesn't have any of. (Please note that your personal disbelief about what the affidavits state doesn't make the "evidence" of their existence disappear. It creates a dispute of fact which can only be satisfied by examining the facts in a court of law and making a determination as to which viewpoint about those facts has greater credibility. Nor does your ideological dismissal of the controversy alter the credibility of the evidence presented so far.)
She lost by way more than 5 votes, but it does get her 5 votes closer. Or what if those votes were FOR her…