Kar-I-Less Flake -- 'Toss out the election and appoint me.'

The courts asked to see the evidence but none had been brought by the plaintiffs, who said they were waiting for the appeal stage to show what they had. This being the stupidest legal argument ever. It was the MAGA attorneys who came unprepared, not the court not wanting to get involved.
So, you think there was no election fraud. No stopping vote counting, no paper put up on windows to block view, no $500 million spent by the Zuck cuck on dem voting militia, no censure of news about Hunter, etc. We got a President who hid in the basement with 81 million votes. The country went from doing great to worst ever in 2 years. Congratulations!
 
So, you think there was no election fraud. No stopping vote counting, no paper put up on windows to block view, no $500 million spent by the Zuck cuck on dem voting militia, no censure of news about Hunter, etc. We got a President who hid in the basement with 81 million votes. The country went from doing great to worst ever in 2 years. Congratulations!
Well I do a bit of reading outside of OANN, Brietbart and this forum, so while some folks spend their time effectively screaming at the mirror, the rest of the world look on in bafflement at MAGA cultism.
Tip; get a new browser (without any cookies or log-in) such as Opera, Chrome, even Edge. Look at Youtube, check out the world's press away from your own mirror and see what the rest of the world is saying about you. You can feel bullied, that's OK but try not to show it.
 
So, you think there was no election fraud. No stopping vote counting, no paper put up on windows to block view, no $500 million spent by the Zuck cuck on dem voting militia, no censure of news about Hunter, etc. We got a President who hid in the basement with 81 million votes. The country went from doing great to worst ever in 2 years. Congratulations!

Your histrionic hyperbolic butthurt elicits joy in my heart.

TY

❤️

🤣
 
How many courts even heard the issues?
Well what can I say, if there is no evidence,then guess what? Courts don't hear them. You just disproved your own claim...*chuckles*
Answer: close to zero.
Umm no, it was more like 50...see the link below
They didn't want to get involved because of what party is in charge.
No they didn't get involved because there was no evidence, just speculation,rumours, or hearsay....Because you think speculation,rumours or hearsay are, doesn't mean courts do. Do you see how this works?
Can you say cancel?
Yes I can, stupid question even for you....
And it's "you're" not "your" you useless tool of bigger fools.
your is the correct word, you're = you are....

"Proof of your claim not withstanding"

So according to you I should have wrote, "Proof of you are claim not withstanding"

I think not.....idiot

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-courts-election-idUSKBN2AF1G1
 
Last edited:
You guys are pathetic…. Look it up dbag!

No USN ret. DORC, decent intelligent Americans don’t cater to the demands of MAGAts like you.

GMAFB

GTFO

And FOAD while you’re at it.

🇺🇸
 
You guys are pathetic…. Look it up dbag!
I asked the question.

If you look at the thread, I also advocate for candidates every legal option available to them.

But cry some more at a simple question
 
Did every poll show Lake winning, many in double digits? No and no. Most polls gave her a very small lead, but not all did, and no poll showed her ahead by more than four points, never mind double digits. Polls nationwide underestimated turnout among left-of-center voters who were disgusted with the loss of Roe and concerned about extremism on the right. That's what we saw here, nothing more and nothing less.
This is the crux of the argument and most likely the sole reason she lost. A more moderate and reasonable Republican might have done better.
 
^^^ Dem efforts to support the Fluffernutters in the primaries seems to have worked out quite well.
 
You guys are pathetic…. Look it up dbag!
Can't fix stupid or brainwashed. They actually think the country is doing great! Bring in another 5 million idiots who don't speak english. So much easier to brainwash and rule over while hijacking the national treasury.
 
Sounds good.... I mean the Democrat is clearly a Russian asset!!! Pee tapes or something.... totally not legitimate.
 
Bring in another 5 million idiots who don't speak english. So much easier to brainwash and rule over while hijacking the national treasury.
But I bet they know the difference between "your" and "you're" (note the non capitalisation of a proper noun as well)

2020 election maybe?

Your right!!
Proof of your claim not withstanding....*chuckles*
And it's "you're" not "your" you useless tool of bigger fools.
How stupid are these MAGA old white men anyhow???
 
Poor Keri, continuing to make an absolute fool of herself, and now in the courts.

MAGAts have no self-monitoring skills. Those were wiped out during years of indoctrination sessions hosted by right-wing media outlets. Cults can be so destructive.
 
So, you think there was no election fraud. No stopping vote counting, no paper put up on windows to block view, no $500 million spent by the Zuck cuck on dem voting militia, no censure of news about Hunter, etc. We got a President who hid in the basement with 81 million votes. The country went from doing great to worst ever in 2 years. Congratulations!
No brain, no headache, eh?
 

Legal experts: Kari Lake's lawsuit to overturn the election is 'poorly written,' lacking details and evidence

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/www.azmirror.com.icoArizona Mirror|35 minutes ago
Kari Lake's lawsuit seeking to overturn the 2022 election and re-do voting will be swiftly thrown out because the claims it makes aren't supported by any evidence and are overly generic, according to ...



Gee, where have we heard that before?


And yet this judge is letting the suit go forward. Unlike the other judge who smacked the lawyers for contempt for just filing the suit.

All Lake is asking for is access to the data to see if there were votes actually counted which shouldn't have been counted. This is based on affidavits from witnesses she possesses. Affidavits which, by the way, comprise that thing called "evidence." Something which you claim she doesn't have any of. (Please note that your personal disbelief about what the affidavits state doesn't make the "evidence" of their existence disappear. It creates a dispute of fact which can only be satisfied by examining the facts in a court of law and making a determination as to which viewpoint about those facts has greater credibility. Nor does your ideological dismissal of the controversy alter the credibility of the evidence presented so far.)
 
lake has 5 days from certification to speak up

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...assive-failures-election-day-maricopa-county/

pretty valid cause to speak up I’d say…. But many who hate conservatives won’t read this article.
Linus won’t read it, it is a media source that is against the liberal media perspective. He is liberal (as he keeps claiming)

As long as things happened that way. Seems like a cornucopia of issues that all magically coincided, as they assert.

With as much scrutiny that was on the election, it sure isn’t easy to do some of things Lake is stating that she thinks happened.

But sure seems like the pile of arguments that DJT carted out in his 60 + court cases. Just hoping enough will stick.
 
How many courts even heard the issues? Answer: close to zero. They didn't want to get involved because of what party is in charge. Can you say cancel?

And it's "you're" not "your" you useless tool of bigger fools.
It’s what now? Are they teaching a new version of English in some schools to replace all of the stuff about slavery and racism to make white people feel better?
 
Back
Top