ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 65,098
Hilary conceded the election.
Kar-I-Less Flake -- 'Toss out the election and appoint me.'
- Thread starter jaF0
- Start date
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
She didn’t invite a gang of thugs to the Capitol building on 1/6/2017.
Yup, another classic Harpy meltdown.
And what are you gonna do if I don't "just shut the fuck up"?
BTW, thanks for recognizing my sense of humor with your use of the word "droll". Always good to know my standup comedy licks are still working.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,760
Me? Do anything? What do you think I am, a mod?
ROFLMAO!!!
BTW, you need to go back to class and learn some reading comprehension because the descriptor wasn't about YOU at all. Unless you're admitting to being a puppeteer...
YDB95
Hopeless Romantic!
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 14,162
Even overlooking the fact that both conceded their elections, that's got nothing to do with the point I was making: that it was Trump who depressed voting among his base by sowing baseless distrust of voting by mail. No one forced him to do that.
So instead of providing an actual response (typical) it just some random insult.
So there is no example, just whining because DJT lost. So funny how facts are so scary to you MAGA folks. Would force you actually admit deep down things didn’t go your way.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,760
dudly, in order to provide an actual response there has to be a conversation.
With you it's never a conversation because that requires that you participate in the conversation rather than do whatever it is that you think you're doing.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,760
Lol, ever the confused victim, eh?
The more you "exercise your right to free speech" the more you prove how imbecilic and out of touch you are. But hey, if that's what you want to show the world as your best efforts you, as you said, are free to ignore good advice telling you to keep quiet for your own good.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,760
I noticed that Lake's team has presented actual evidence that 42.5% of the randomly selected same day voting ballots they audited were invalid because they were printed incorrectly and that the errors were the cause of ballots not being able to be tabulated.
The allegation is that the errors were intentional and malicious and designed to disenfranchise R voters. The elections commission says that the voters had other options rather than use the invalid ballots.
Really? The elections commission gives a voter an invalid ballot to use then says the voter has other options? Voters don't know the ballots are invalid, but the election commission did. So what option does the voter have at the point the ballot is tossed as invalid?
Remember, the complaint is that the voters were disenfranchised. If they were given invalid ballots, that's the end game right there. It's not that the ballots examined were able to be counted. It's that the invalid ballots might have been improperly tabulated AND that some R voters were discouraged and therefore didn't/couldn't vote at all.
42.5% isn't miniscule. Nor is the fact that those particular ballots all seemed to appear in only heavy R districts. This was an intentional act to disenfranchise R voters.
The allegation is that the errors were intentional and malicious and designed to disenfranchise R voters. The elections commission says that the voters had other options rather than use the invalid ballots.
Really? The elections commission gives a voter an invalid ballot to use then says the voter has other options? Voters don't know the ballots are invalid, but the election commission did. So what option does the voter have at the point the ballot is tossed as invalid?
Remember, the complaint is that the voters were disenfranchised. If they were given invalid ballots, that's the end game right there. It's not that the ballots examined were able to be counted. It's that the invalid ballots might have been improperly tabulated AND that some R voters were discouraged and therefore didn't/couldn't vote at all.
42.5% isn't miniscule. Nor is the fact that those particular ballots all seemed to appear in only heavy R districts. This was an intentional act to disenfranchise R voters.
DeluxAuto
AntiSocial Extrovert
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Posts
- 21,950
ELECTION SECURITY RUMOR VS. REALITY
https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrolMARICOPA COUNTY ELECTION FACTS | VOTING EQUIPMENT & ACCURACY
https://www.maricopa.gov/5539/Voting-Equipment-Facts
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,760
Lol, you cite to propaganda/opinion to rebut LEGAL EVIDENCE?
Where are your "but but there's no evidence" tears?
DeluxAuto
AntiSocial Extrovert
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Posts
- 21,950
I linked to the official government website facts, Derpy. You typed something.
You tried.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,760
Wait, the GOVERNMENT is being sued for engaging in voter suppression and you linked to the government's statements of perfection as proof that the government isn't doing what's alleged and for which there's now EVIDENCE they actually are and which evidence you used to claim didn't exist? That's your case? A citation to where the gov says it's not doing what the evidence actually shows they are doing?I linked to the official government website facts, Derpy. You typed something.
You tried.
Lol. Good one!
DeluxAuto
AntiSocial Extrovert
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Posts
- 21,950
The government is being sued by a crybaby moron (not you in this case) who is a perpetual loser (again, not you.)
Did you know that anyone can sue anyone else for anything?
Lawyers do. (also not you)
Last edited:
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 65,098
He didn't read. Shitty lawyer.
^^^Imbecilic and out of touch. In Arizona, we saw the real story unfold in real time, but Harpy, as usual, is desperately grasping at straws from afar.
This problem had to do with vote scanners not being able to read certain ballots where the print came out too light. The ballots were preserved, and the ballots were ultimately tabulated. The votes were counted. His theory that "some R voters were discouraged and therefore didn't/couldn't vote at all" is just more posturing as hapless victims. This victim posturing was also taking place during the vote on election day as both Lake and Trump laid the groundwork for their future excuses about why Lake lost. It's called "hedging your bets".
Lake did exactly what Trump did in his two elections-- she said ahead of the election that she would only accept the results if she won. Voters rejected that bullshit. Lake lost because she had a shitty attitude and supported Trump's lies about his election loss. Other Republican candidates in the same election and in the same County won their races.
There was no "intentional act to disenfranchise R voters". Keri Lake will not be crowned governor of Arizona by the courts, as she requested. Donald Trump will not be "reinstated" as President, as he demanded. Harpy once again sides with liars, because he suffers from the same paranoid victim syndrome as the rest of the MAGA cult.
rainsol
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 1,344
the bannions of the world did. no one is disputing he got bad advice. I believe Hillary retracted her concession anyway. I dont believe concession means shit.
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 65,098
Hillary did not retract her concession.
schism666
cold and ugly
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Posts
- 12,557
lmao what kind of bullshit hail mary was that?
Pointing out how wrong you are, and glaringly, I guess would look like there isn’t a conversation.
Let’s try this…
Ohhhh Arpy, please do opine on all the things you know so much more about than the rest of the world.
—
Did I miss it? I know I blinked.
Again, being wrong all the time has to be painful- so sorry about that for you. Please return to defending your alt right views that you think are the best ever. They are completely wrong and are devoid of anything that even resembles fact.
If you had one lone example, which you don’t, of a voting rule change that was “illegal” for 2020 that is more than “it allowed all people to actually vote instead counting on just conservative die hards”… we are all ears.
Again… crickets.
Heck pick a state, I’ll go through the changes one at a time with you.
What’s that, another insult about how you aren’t feeling engaged in the conversation since you have nothing to at all to actually meet the topic? Pity for you.
Thanks this has been fun!
jaF0
Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Posts
- 39,168
"
PHOENIX — An expert testifying at Republican Kari Lake’s trial challenging her defeat in Arizona governor’s race said Thursday that her claims about the impact of Election Day lines and voter disenfranchisement on the outcome weren’t backed by evidence.
Kenneth Mayer, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, also criticized a claim by a pollster who testified on Lake's behalf that technical problems at polling places had disenfranchised enough voters that it would have been a game-changer in the contest ultimately won by Democrat Katie Hobbs with just over 17,000 votes.
“There is absolutely no evidence to support that conclusion,” Mayer said of the pollster's argument for Lake, calling those “a series of assumptions and speculation.”
"
https://www.12news.com/article/news...-loss/75-c1c82b2d-ef8f-49d3-b6ac-c7c5f3462508
PHOENIX — An expert testifying at Republican Kari Lake’s trial challenging her defeat in Arizona governor’s race said Thursday that her claims about the impact of Election Day lines and voter disenfranchisement on the outcome weren’t backed by evidence.
Kenneth Mayer, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, also criticized a claim by a pollster who testified on Lake's behalf that technical problems at polling places had disenfranchised enough voters that it would have been a game-changer in the contest ultimately won by Democrat Katie Hobbs with just over 17,000 votes.
“There is absolutely no evidence to support that conclusion,” Mayer said of the pollster's argument for Lake, calling those “a series of assumptions and speculation.”
"
https://www.12news.com/article/news...-loss/75-c1c82b2d-ef8f-49d3-b6ac-c7c5f3462508
Similar threads
