Is it better to play to an empty house, than to not play at all?

No. If you can send the support staff home early, you save on labor costs.
 
The general rule is that if the cast outnumbers the audience the performance is cancelled
 
If no one sees a leaf fall in a forest, how do you know that the leaf fell?

All Art requires an interaction between the artist and the audience, a communication, however flawed, of ideas, of concepts.

If there is no audience, Art is useless.

When Burlesque artists first performed in early silent movies, they found it difficult to make the transfer. They were used to reacting to, and working with, a live audience. They adapted their performance to the audience's response, yet with no audience, just a movie camera, they didn't know whether their act was working or not. To them, playing to a camera was just like playing to an empty house.

They soon learned, from watching audiences respond to the movie.
 
Last edited:
I did an important audition once to a less than excited house which effected my performance. Their mid-morning dull faces and lack of enthusiasm made me think that I wasn't liked and I almost just walked off. But being the trooper, I ended with a dancers flourish as if I were the star of the future show. The mild applause continued to make me certain that I was a flop but later the people making the final decisions were very, very nice! :) 11am was just too early for theater people on that fourth days of auditions.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top