Hold command

Croctden

Really Really Experienced
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Posts
476
If I'm spanking a sub I'd rather not have her tied down, but holding herself still for me. I'm not sure why, I guess it seems more submissive. Any other doms agree?
 
I love it. It's an excellent way to sink them deeper into submission, and they usually bind themselves mentally down even without a command.
 
Well, I'm no Dom, Croctden, but I almost always submit to Sir this way. I love the mental and emotional submission of being still. Sometimes, depending on what He's doing, I do better than other times ;)

~anelize
 
Holding still is the best way to enjoy things. I am always completely relaxed for spankings.

Struggling? Heck, I wouldn't want to get away for anything. ;)
 
My apologies for the double post...
 
Last edited:
I've heard this referred to as "mental bondage" before, and yes, I use it. But I also love the sexy look of leather restraints. So... just depends on my mood.

The problem I do have with the restraints is that I need to arrange something to clip them to, and that's not always convenient. Whereas telling a slut "bend over! now, don't move!" is always convenient!
 
I'm another fan of not restraining for spankings.

I love to stop and wait for my pet to stop wiggling. Waiting for him to remember his place and his submission before returning to the task at hand.


Helena :rose:
 
Croctden said:
If I'm spanking a sub I'd rather not have her tied down, but holding herself still for me. I'm not sure why, I guess it seems more submissive. Any other doms agree?

Weird, just thinking of this today. Hurt self, cannot manhandle. I love the idea of making her stand there and take a brutal asswhipping with a belt.
 
"Lie there with your legs apart. No, wider than that! Now don't move."

Now proceed to tease with tip of tongue, cunt lips, inner lips, a little into the cunt, lightly brushing against the clit occasionally... just keeping her frantic, waiting for...

"You moved!" *smack* One hand mark imprinted on her inner thigh. "Now I'll have to start all over again. And this time, don't move!"

:D
 
Hmmmmm she will hold still, that sums it up I think, no ifs,buts or anything only instant obedience.

Yep that works for me
 
FungiUg said:
"Lie there with your legs apart. No, wider than that! Now don't move."

Now proceed to tease with tip of tongue, cunt lips, inner lips, a little into the cunt, lightly brushing against the clit occasionally... just keeping her frantic, waiting for...

"You moved!" *smack* One hand mark imprinted on her inner thigh. "Now I'll have to start all over again. And this time, don't move!"

:D


Nice Bruce, what wouldn't I give right this minute *sigh*
 
Bachlum Chaam said:
Nice Bruce, what wouldn't I give right this minute *sigh*

Tim, am I mistaken, or don't you have a submissive in the works now? (Hope so, anyway!) Me, I'm in bliss... that last post of mine ain't just a fantasy!
 
I make exceptions with spanking virgins. I like them cuffed because is a natural tendency to reach back with their hand.
 
Call me weird, but I have a thing for mitts. I don't mind telling someone to assume the position but I find all that bondage hoo-ha visually stimulating.
 
"Don't touch me" is a great game and sheer torture for her.

I sit her in a chair and tell her not to touch me, not to use her hands, to leave them on the arms of the chair. Then I kiss her. I fondle her breasts, run my hand between her legs. and she can't touch me: can't interfere, can't protect herself. It drives her nuts not to be able to touch me.

But it's sure not an either/or thing. It's not either ropes or no ropes. The bondage has its place andis always fun. The "don't touch me" is just a different sort of bondage.

---dr.M.
 
Completely understand where this is coming from. Not that tying her down can't be fun too depending on the mood, but to me this sort of mental control is much more fulfilling.
 
so far Daddy hasn't restrained in anyway other than mentally, i'm very good at staying still.
but i have a feeling i will be bound immobile in the near future
 
This thread runs along the line of something I was just asked the other day:

Would I prefer to be spanked while restrained or submit myself to spanking without restraints?

I had to think about it, because both options appeal to me in different ways.

If restrained, I can allow myself to play the role of the captive, one who is being controlled forcefully.

And when not restrained, it is much more of a mental issue, giving my submission to Him. This option is much more difficult for me, but also much more fulfilling.

cat
 
I sent Himself this link... We have been doing this for the longest time... but we never really discussed it... today we did...

He thought that I did not care for this type of bondage... silly Sir... I do prefer to be bound and restrained, as I was today... spread eagle, face down... arms and legs tied to the posts of the new bed He made me... blindfolded... and strapped on the bed... When I am like that I can let go... I can fly... and I did. :D

But the other day was no less erotic, when he had me up against the work bench... spanking my ass... I had to restrain myself... it is harder to do that... It requires that I be more present... if that makes sense... but it no less a turn on... just a different one... :D
 
i understand that completely cellis, there are many times all i want to do is fly and if i have to assume and hold i can't just let go and take flight because my head needs to stay at least some what focused on holding position.
the last time i was with Daddy i was holding position that called for me to be on my tip toes and bent over at the waist, i started to take flight lost my footing and had a crash landing. needless to say Daddy was not all to happy with my attention drifting from where He wanted it to be
 
lilredwolph said:
i understand that completely cellis, there are many times all i want to do is fly and if i have to assume and hold i can't just let go and take flight because my head needs to stay at least some what focused on holding position.
the last time i was with Daddy i was holding position that called for me to be on my tip toes and bent over at the waist, i started to take flight lost my footing and had a crash landing. needless to say Daddy was not all to happy with my attention drifting from where He wanted it to be

I know what you mean.... The other day He had me bent over the work bench... spanking me with this wide nylon stapping that I had gotten at the feed store that was going out of business... and He hit me on that spot on the top of my thigh that is so sensitive and I screamed and moved and He just laughed... He knew He had gotten that spot... He meant to make it hurt so that I would move and lose my concentration... it worked...
 
Croctden said:
If I'm spanking a sub I'd rather not have her tied down, but holding herself still for me. I'm not sure why, I guess it seems more submissive. Any other doms agree?
And why bother with a command at all.

A simple look without blinking should suffice.
 
Submitting to a spanking without bondage is intensely erotic. However, a full out flogging/strapping/cropping/paddling maybe even whipping- I absolutely cannot hold still, it's just a natural reaction for my body to move, and I pretty much have to be well restrained or my moving target body gets hit in places not intended.

And, we both find bondae highly erotic, and at times he has a great deal of fun finding new ways of using rope.

- justina
 
It's always nice to give them something to hold onto. Besides, there are things that one just can't hold still for. I like mental bondage, or whatever you call it, but sometimes the real thing may be neccisary.
 
Back
Top