Has LT/LJ/theguywhofakedhisdeath always hated women?

[KyleW]

Or is this some new thing?

I never paid much attention to his ramblings. He and BB are interchangeably dumb.

 

[Wok]

Or is this some new thing?

I never paid much attention to his ramblings. He and BB are interchangeably dumb.

Nope, he has always been that way. Since the name change, he has kept to his own threads, mostly.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Woah! A thread in my honor! Ain't seen that in a while.

 

[richard_daily]

Or is this some new thing?

I never paid much attention to his ramblings. He and BB are interchangeably dumb.

He's always hated women, but he used to have other interests as well.

He's basically just another version of veteman.

 

[Morcheeba]

Less than 200 views, 68 comments for this one.

 

[Morcheeba]

He's always hated women, but he used to have other interests as well.

He's basically just another version of veteman.

Meh, maybe not since Richard is awake.

I fold.

 

[richard_daily]

Meh, maybe not since Richard is awake.

I fold.

like a house of crazy cards.

 

[Morcheeba]

like a house of crazy cards.

I should be more like a rock bottom, what is it in your sigline?

Oh, a rock bottom riser.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

He's always hated women, but he used to have other interests as well.

He's basically just another version of veteman.

Except that his cause of Conservatism is dying, and my cause - men's rights - is POWERFULLY ascendant. His people are losing battles and my people - the MRAs - are winning them.

 

[Morcheeba]

Or is this some new thing?

I never paid much attention to his ramblings. He and BB are interchangeably dumb.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxqCGTkV5wg

Like brilliant George Carlin once said, "And fuck Tucker's friend Kyle. There's another soft name for a boy, Kyle. Kyle. Soft names make soft people."

 

[KRCummings]

He was entertaining when he focused his wrath on other Litsters. But after he failed to show up at a meeting with one and then got punked into getting banned by me he changed focus and now it's a general hatred of women. Always there but not quite on the surface.

 

[Morcheeba]

He was entertaining when he focused his wrath on other Litsters. But after he failed to show up at a meeting with one and then got punked into getting banned by me he changed focus and now it's a general hatred of women. Always there but not quite on the surface.

I have to admit, I was entertained by you and LT in here. Oftentimes you both seemed suited for each other.

 

[LadyVer]

Except that his cause of Conservatism is dying, and my cause - men's rights - is POWERFULLY ascendant. His people are losing battles and my people - the MRAs - are winning them.

Right..And I have some swamp land to sell you, you weenie.

 

[badbabysitter]

Right..And I have some swamp land to sell you, you weenie.

He can't actually tell you what rights men have lost... but THEY"RE WINNING!!!!!

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Right..And I have some swamp land to sell you, you weenie.

Weenie this!

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/2012/08/angry-men-feminist-agenda/3/

Aptaker’s story underscores a disturbing trend: Men’s rights groups, convinced that men are the biggest victims of modern society, have been busy attacking, defunding, and repealing laws that have been very effective at protecting women and lowering rates of domestic violence. And rather than just ranting and raving on the Internet, these men have been pulling political levers to change both state and federal laws. That they’ve done so with remarkable success ought to make everyone very, very scared.

But that’s all the more reason that civil rights and women’s groups need to wake up and get involved, something they’ve been slow to do. When I spoke to Toni Troop of Jane Doe Inc., a Massachusetts sexual assault and domestic violence advocacy group, she assured me that “People see through their rhetoric and their repeated attempts to undermine safety for the real victims of domestic violence.” Really? Then why have they been so successful at changing the law? More women’s and mothers’ groups need to start attending these meetings and demanding a seat at the table.

MRA groups have been changing laws to become more EQUAL, not anti-woman. And they are winning. Even the media acknowledges that.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Another reason why this thread came into existence...

Then, last year, Fathers and Families and the Fatherhood Coalition achieved a major victory with the passage of the Alimony Reform Act of 2011, which removed the requirement that men pay alimony after retirement. The success of that bill allowed them to fine-tune their technique of advancing legislation: Get the governor to appoint a task force to examine the issue, secure a seat on the task force, influence the ultimate consensus, and then send it to the legislature.

PEOPLE LIKE ME ARE A THREAT.

 

[badbabysitter]

from LT's own post

"a disturbing trend: Men’s rights groups, convinced that men are the biggest victims of modern society, have been busy attacking, defunding, and repealing laws that have been very effective at protecting women and lowering rates of domestic violence."

apparently, more domestic violence is a good thing

and then he follows it up with this bit of wisdom

"MRA groups have been changing laws to become more EQUAL, not anti-woman. And they are winning. Even the media acknowledges that."

How is repealing laws that have" been very effective at protecting women an lowering rates of domestic violence".... NOT anti-woman?

 

[LadyVer]

Weenie this!

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/2012/08/angry-men-feminist-agenda/3/


MRA groups have been changing laws to become more EQUAL, not anti-woman. And they are winning. Even the media acknowledges that.

You need to take a stand, Lt. You have misrepresennted yourself too long as pro-feminist and pro-human rights. You're just one more misogynist who knows jackshit about human rights.

You big weenie.

 

[badbabysitter]

Another reason why this thread came into existence...


PEOPLE LIKE ME ARE A THREAT.

so you're blaming a woman for something she had no part of doing ( the whole Alimony Reform Act) because she wasn't allowed to vote or fight


you're not a threat... you're an idiot

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You need to take a stand, Lt. You have misrepresennted yourself too long as pro-feminist and pro-human rights. You're just one more misogynist who knows jackshit about human rights.

You big weenie.

So fighting for men's rights is being against women and against human rights. Gotcha. You big hypocrite. You just stay here and keep being a hypocrite while we go force Congress to introduce men's rights reforms into the VAWA, demolish alimony and sexist child custody laws, etc. As long as you're not in the field doing battle, it's all good!

PS: I know you fear to answer this - but which women's right have I ever come out in opposition of?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

from LT's own post

"a disturbing trend: Men’s rights groups, convinced that men are the biggest victims of modern society, have been busy attacking, defunding, and repealing laws that have been very effective at protecting women and lowering rates of domestic violence."

Laugh out loud. Extremist gender-feminists ALWAYS embellish things like that. It is unlikely that anyone ever attacked protections for women against domestic violence. What MRA groups have done is ensure that men are equally protected. These gender-feminist extremists call that reducing protection for women. Gender feminists blow everything out of proportion - it's a normal (for them) panic response to MRAs achieving equal treatment for men.

 

[renard_ruse]

So fighting for men's rights is being against women and against human rights. Gotcha. You big hypocrite...

Its no different than when someone supports equal rights for whites they are called "racist." You seem to draw a distinction between the two hypocrisies though.

Your beloved Democrat Party and its media support machine have perfected the strategy over and over again, not just with feminism but with all the other groups which make up their coalition.

 

[badbabysitter]

Laugh out loud. Extremist gender-feminists ALWAYS embellish things like that. It is unlikely that anyone ever attacked protections for women against domestic violence. What MRA groups have done is ensure that men are equally protected. These gender-feminist extremists call that reducing protection for women. Gender feminists blow everything out of proportion - it's a normal (for them) panic response to MRAs achieving equal treatment for men.

I wasnt embellishing... I was quoting.....you

so domestic violnece stats from the UN, NHS, the CDC, CMC.. are all blown out of proportion...and only Men's Rights groups and the Republican party know the truth

really?

really?

i believe men should fight to create more balanced alimony and divorce law.. I do believe that men and women should have equal punishment under the law.. men get longer sentences for most crimes then women do ( a distinct note being men get shorter sentences for some crimes then women do never seems to get mentioned by your crusaders)

but trying to repeal laws that act effectivel.. to try to stop legislation that now is now longer gender discriminatory... that goes beyond stupid

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Its no different than when someone supports equal rights for whites they are called "racist." You seem to draw a distinction between the two hypocrisies though.

Yeah, you musta missed the long ago thread where I, under my LovingTongue or Le Jacquelope login, posted that "White Student Union" was not inherently racist and shouldn't be outlawed by colleges.

 

[badbabysitter]

Its no different than when someone supports equal rights for whites they are called "racist." You seem to draw a distinction between the two hypocrisies though.

Your beloved Democrat Party and its media support machine have perfected the strategy over and over again, not just with feminism but with all the other groups which make up their coalition.

there's the victim card again