George your first non elected President in history...

Re: Re: George your first non elected President in history...

teddybear4play said:
All three times it's been answered, you bloody cunting sot wanker.

TB4p

The only answer on all three occasions has been the tax rebate...

Don't you feel you sold your soul to the devil for a few paltry dollars?

ppman
 
Texan said:
I'm just trying to let you know how much I appreciate you, without being "arrogant."

ppman, from time to time, you create reasonably thought out threads. Today, you're posting bullshit. You haven't posted anything to reply to in a reasonable manner.

I would have thought the question was quite simple really. Why not answer it?

ppman
 
Morning p_p-man,

I guess you've finished all your DIY projects so far.

Anything new you're planning for the future ?

Rex :rose:
 
Yes, yes I have!

His skillfull handling of the economy (because the sitting President ALWAYS gets blame or credit) has enriched me and my household and allowed me to put back a large chunk of change for my little one's education.

Also since I hang with the 'Publicans, the things I say to legislators has a better chance of going somewhere than it did when the guy who was elected by LESS THAN HALF OF THE AMERICAN VOTERS was in office...




HOW HAS YOUR LIFE GOTTEN WORSE BECAUSE HE WAS ELECTED, OTHER THAN YOUR MENTAL HEALTH WHICH WE CAN SEE HAS DIMINISHED GREATLY...?
 
SINthysist said:
Yes, yes I have!

His skillfull handling of the economy (because the sitting President ALWAYS gets blame or credit) has enriched me and my household and allowed me to put back a large chunk of change for my little one's education.

Also since I hang with the 'Publicans, the things I say to legislators has a better chance of going somewhere than it did when the guy who was elected by LESS THAN HALF OF THE AMERICAN VOTERS was in office...




HOW HAS YOUR LIFE GOTTEN WORSE BECAUSE HE WAS ELECTED, OTHER THAN YOUR MENTAL HEALTH WHICH WE CAN SEE HAS DIMINISHED GREATLY...?

<pssst, SIN . . . who ya talkin' to?? . . . or ya just having another general rave??? :) >
 
p_p_man DID start this thread with a question which I just now answered having JUST NOW read the thread...

As for the babble which followed, I am not responsible for following since was the usual p_p_bash.

p_p_man does need to own up to the fact that the shrub won the recounts of the Liberal Gore-Biased American Press...

:D
 
BTW - I had forgotten all about the rebate...

I put it into a fund.

It's bigger.

:D
 
Rex1960 said:
Morning p_p-man,

I guess you've finished all your DIY projects so far.

Anything new you're planning for the future ?

Rex :rose:

Morning Rex,

I've got the spare room still to paint! But thanks to the tips and advice I received on the DIY thread this one may not be so traumatic...

:D

ppman
 
SINthysist said:
Yes, yes I have!

[answer to your question edited out...]



HOW HAS YOUR LIFE GOTTEN WORSE BECAUSE HE WAS ELECTED, OTHER THAN YOUR MENTAL HEALTH WHICH WE CAN SEE HAS DIMINISHED GREATLY...?
 
SINthysist said:

My life has definitely become enriched since George burst onto the scene...

I've never had so much fun writing about someone since the days of Michael Foot (a one time leader of the British Labour Party and a complete eccentric).

:D

ppman
 
p_p_man said:
Morning Rex,

I've got the spare room still to paint! But thanks to the tips and advice I received on the DIY thread this one may not be so traumatic...

:D

ppman

Since you got more than one room I consider you rich and priviliged. How does that feel ? :D
 
HOW could you mis-read the question?

I'll be kind in rememberance of those brave pilgrims who came to America to establish a socialist paradise and were almost wiped out that first year by the non-efforts of the lazy...

Thanks to them, and their sterling example, we have the free, capitalistic society that we enjoy today and you have to merge with the rest of Europe to compete (because you're STILL trying to support the lazy...).

:D
 
Neo-Feudalism . . .

SINthysist said:
HOW could you mis-read the question?

I'll be kind in rememberance of those brave pilgrims who came to America to establish a socialist paradise and were almost wiped out that first year by the non-efforts of the lazy...

Thanks to them, and their sterling example, we have the free, capitalistic society that we enjoy today and you have to merge with the rest of Europe to compete (because you're STILL trying to support the lazy...).

:D

. . . and, turning the full historical circle, an appointed puppet President with string-pullers intent on returning the Western world to the worst excesses of feudalism . . .

Dubyah's neo-feudalism is being thrust upon the capitalist world to perpetuate the wasteful, inefficient and amoral business management excesses that masquarade as US corporate governence . . .

The current attacks upon publicly owned enterprises like Oz Telstra, the world's No 1 Telco, State owned power stations in Oz (which the multinationals are trying to sell BACK to the respective governments because the multinationals are unable to asset strip or price hike), the destruction of Oz State run insurance corporations that put a bottom in the market and held prices down for the benefit of the people, etc . . .

Globalisation for the benefit of US manufacturers exploiting their over-capacity with marginal production costs to take over markets presently occupied by other nationalities . . .

US refusal to eliminate tariffs on agricultural production and the "subsidies for all" US Farm Act . . . thus inhibiting competition for US farmers from third world producers having lower production costs and frequently more efficient production methods . . .

The misnamed Patriot Act that unfettered the security forces to form the biggest secret police organisation in the world, renown for thier efficiency at predicting and preventing 9/11, while simultanoeusly stripping hard earned and traditionally held common law rights from the American people . . .

The new Home Defence Act which will allow the ruling clique to LEGALLY interfere and hassle any opponents, circa the PR China model, without the citizens having legl recourse . . . (shades of McCarthy and Henry the Eighth) . . .

And yet within all this self-aggrandisement, America has produced jazz, the stage musical and . . . oh yes, the US Constitution that was overridden by the Supreme Court in the 2000 elections . . .

Good one, SIN :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Neo-Feudalism . . .

Don K Dyck said:
. . . and, turning the full historical circle, an appointed puppet President with string-pullers intent on returning the Western world to the worst excesses of feudalism . . .

Dubyah's neo-feudalism is being thrust upon the capitalist world to perpetuate the wasteful, inefficient and amoral business management excesses that masquarade as US corporate governence . . .

The current attacks upon publicly owned enterprises like Oz Telstra, the world's No 1 Telco, State owned power stations in Oz (which the multinationals are trying to sell BACK to the respective governments because the multinationals are unable to asset strip or price hike), the destruction of Oz State run insurance corporations that put a bottom in the market and held prices down for the benefit of the people, etc . . .

Globalisation for the benefit of US manufacturers exploiting their over-capacity with marginal production costs to take over markets presently occupied by other nationalities . . .

US refusal to eliminate tariffs on agricultural production and the "subsidies for all" US Farm Act . . . thus inhibiting competition for US farmers from third world producers having lower production costs and frequently more efficient production methods . . .

The misnamed Patriot Act that unfettered the security forces to form the biggest secret police organisation in the world, renown for thier efficiency at predicting and preventing 9/11, while simultanoeusly stripping hard earned and traditionally held common law rights from the American people . . .

The new Home Defence Act which will allow the ruling clique to LEGALLY interfere and hassle any opponents, circa the PR China model, without the citizens having legl recourse . . . (shades of McCarthy and Henry the Eighth) . . .

And yet within all this self-aggrandisement, America has produced jazz, the stage musical and . . . oh yes, the US Constitution that was overridden by the Supreme Court in the 2000 elections . . .

Good one, SIN :)



Don, you're full of shit.

Explain to me how the Constitution was overridden by the Supreme Court. Specific facts, not high school rhetoric.

I'm asking Don, and no one else to qualify his dumb statement.

Fredwave, peepee boy, and 70W30 - no one is asking you. Don stepped in the dog shit and doesn't need your help cleaning it off.

Can't wait for this response.
 
p_p_man said:
I'm going to throw out the same challenge I've done three times before on this Board

After that dribbling moron beame your Commander in Chief...

Have you gained any personal advantage from it?

ppman

Bush is the fourth president to serve who did not win the popular vote. But he did win the popular vote in Florida.
As for gaining any personal advantage, I'll support the candidate that will leave me alone and let me keep more of the money I've earned. In general terms, neither major party is living up to what I have in mind, though the Republicans at least seem to like the idea of workers paying less in taxes.
 
So really it's the same as before...

Apart from the tax refund nobody has gained any serious advantage from George being in power.

So why do people vote for him?

At least with the Democrats you would have had a good shot at having health care for all...

ppman
 
Re: So really it's the same as before...

p_p_man said:

At least with the Democrats you would have had a good shot at having health care for all...

ppman

We've already got health care for all. Federal, state and local tax dollars pay for medical care for those who can't afford it. The rest of us buy health insurance, or take our chances and don't buy insurance.
Health care for all always ultimately means rationed, poorer healthcare. I'd rather stick with what is in place now — even better, something with less government interference — knowing that if I need an MRI I won't be put on some weeks-long waiting list.
 
Re: Re: So really it's the same as before...

Ham Murabi said:
We've already got health care for all. Federal, state and local tax dollars pay for medical care for those who can't afford it. The rest of us buy health insurance, or take our chances and don't buy insurance.
Health care for all always ultimately means rationed, poorer healthcare. I'd rather stick with what is in place now — even better, something with less government interference — knowing that if I need an MRI I won't be put on some weeks-long waiting list.

OK, maybe I should have said an uncomplicated system of health care for all. Where you're looked after by the State from the cradle to the grave...

No having to prove what you can or cannot afford...

ppman
 
Re: So really it's the same as before...

p_p_man said:
At least with the Democrats you would have had a good shot at having health care for all...
The last effort at that was so terrible not even the Democrats voted for it.

I don't know what your problem is. You characterize a return of our own money as a "bribe," but yet massive entitlement spending is okay in your book.

Reason #1254 why you're a cunting moron who has no business debating U.S. politics.

TB4p
 
Back
Top