Everyone was in the loop ... including Devin Nunes

Pookie

Chop!! Chop!!
Joined
Aug 25, 2002
Posts
58,778
Exclusive: Giuliani associate willing to tell Congress Nunes met with ex-Ukrainian official to get dirt on Biden

(CNN)A lawyer for an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani tells CNN that his client is willing to tell Congress about meetings the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee had in Vienna last year with a former Ukrainian prosecutor to discuss digging up dirt on Joe Biden.

The attorney, Joseph A. Bondy, represents Lev Parnas, the recently indicted Soviet-born American who worked with Giuliani to push claims of Democratic corruption in Ukraine. Bondy said that Parnas was told directly by the former Ukrainian official that he met last year in Vienna with Rep. Devin Nunes.

"Mr. Parnas learned from former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Victor Shokin that Nunes had met with Shokin in Vienna last December," said Bondy.

...

Parnas' claims that Nunes met with Shokin, which has not been previously reported, add further context to a Daily Beast report that Parnas helped arrange meetings and calls in Europe for Nunes last year, citing another Parnas' lawyer, Ed McMahon.

...

"Nunes had told Shokin of the urgent need to launch investigations into Burisma, Joe and Hunter Biden, and any purported Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election," Bondy told CNN.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/22/politics/nunes-vienna-trip-ukrainian-prosecutor-biden/index.html
 
Maybe Schiff is not the Shifty one! and maybe the hearings ain’t quite over.
 
You guys are all nuts.

'Get dirt on' is simply being deliberately oblivious to the real thing, which is - 'expose criminal acts and gross illegality.'

And there is no possibility of a 'quid pro quo' when someone seeks to ensure that someone else hasn't broken the law, or doesn't do so - it is a RIGHT, and it may even be an entitlement of any and every simple citizen, and it IS an obligation for a sitting President to make sure that external aid funds are not misused or part of a systemic corrupt regime's dealings.

THE FUCKING END.
 
You guys are all nuts.

'Get dirt on' is simply being deliberately oblivious to the real thing, which is - 'expose criminal acts and gross illegality.'

And there is no possibility of a 'quid pro quo' when someone seeks to ensure that someone else hasn't broken the law, or doesn't do so - it is a RIGHT, and it may even be an entitlement of any and every simple citizen, and it IS an obligation for a sitting President to make sure that external aid funds are not misused or part of a systemic corrupt regime's dealings.

THE FUCKING END.

Your desire is making you weak.
 
You guys are all nuts.

'Get dirt on' is simply being deliberately oblivious to the real thing, which is - 'expose criminal acts and gross illegality.'

And there is no possibility of a 'quid pro quo' when someone seeks to ensure that someone else hasn't broken the law, or doesn't do so - it is a RIGHT, and it may even be an entitlement of any and every simple citizen, and it IS an obligation for a sitting President to make sure that external aid funds are not misused or part of a systemic corrupt regime's dealings.

THE FUCKING END.

Not to mention the President himself denied asking a 'quid pro quo' even while he was actually asking for a 'quid pro quo' which means it is impossible that a 'quid pro quo' actually occurred! Checkmate, libtards!
 
It is not the obligation of the president and his cronies to peddle Russian propaganda.
 
Parnas’s lawyer says Parnas is also willing to talk about a series of meetings he took part in at the Trump International Hotel in DC about Ukraine. claims he was part of a “team” which met several times a week in a private room on the second floor of the Trump Hotel.

The group, according to Parnas’s lawyer,*included Rudy Giuliani,*Lev Parnas, the journalist John Solomon, and the married attorneys Joe diGenova and Victoria Toensing.


https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/11/22/...or-biden/index.html?__twitter_impression=true
 
The very same Solomon that was fired from the Hill for peddling Ukraine conspiracies? I do believe there is, now that you mention it.
 
I think we now see why Schiff did not announce the end of the public hearings this week. Can they keep a camera trained on Nunes’s face during Schiff’s questioning of the Russian thug?:D
 
http://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2085985&stc=1&d=1574516274

He seems mad.
 
Last edited:
Isnt it weird how everytime a thread like this happens, you never see any right wingers until they hear how to respond from their leaders? You respond like this...yes daddy
...
 
You guys are all nuts.

'Get dirt on' is simply being deliberately oblivious to the real thing, which is - 'expose criminal acts and gross illegality.'

And there is no possibility of a 'quid pro quo' when someone seeks to ensure that someone else hasn't broken the law, or doesn't do so - it is a RIGHT, and it may even be an entitlement of any and every simple citizen, and it IS an obligation for a sitting President to make sure that external aid funds are not misused or part of a systemic corrupt regime's dealings.

THE FUCKING END.

*shakes head no* and says “yes”
 
Isnt it weird how everytime a thread like this happens, you never see any right wingers until they hear how to respond from their leaders? You respond like this...yes daddy
...
Will Trump defend Nunes though? He’s Portuguese.
 
NotQue will be along shortly with his

talking point

talking point

talking point

talking point

talking point

talking point

talking point

talking point

talking point

talking point

talking point

Over and over and over the same bullshit talking points Over and over
Once again:
Talking point

Isnt it weird how everytime a thread like this happens, you never see any right wingers until they hear how to respond from their leaders? You respond like this...yes daddy
...
 
No problem with Hunter?

I don't get it. Investigating the POTUS even before he is in office is fine no matter what crooked means they use but Hunter and Hillary get a pass on everything and looking into their crooked crap is somehow a crime? They were not inventing dirt on Hunter so even if they put a light on it so what? You folks really don't see the problem with Joe and Hunter?
 
I don't get it. Investigating the POTUS even before he is in office is fine no matter what crooked means they use but Hunter and Hillary get a pass on everything and looking into their crooked crap is somehow a crime? They were not inventing dirt on Hunter so even if they put a light on it so what? You folks really don't see the problem with Joe and Hunter?

Hillary has been more or less constantly investigated by Republican lynch mobs for decades and they've found precisely fuck all.
 
Hey, isn't there a poster on this board who likes to share John Solomon op-eds? 🤦

The very same Solomon that was fired from the Hill for peddling Ukraine conspiracies? I do believe there is, now that you mention it.


He’ll be here soon. Probably has a few more RW Op Eds to get through, so he can present his ‘facts’ and ordure references.
 
Back
Top