BoyNextDoor
I hate liars
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Posts
- 14,158
Another stooge of a Trump judicial nominee.
From the ABA:
Mr. VanDyke is a highly educated lawyer with nearly 14 years of experience in
appellate law, including one year as a law clerk, an associate in a law firm, and as a
Solicitor General for over five-plus years, first in Montana and then Nevada, two states
in the Ninth Circuit where he would serve if confirmed. The Committee was tasked with
balancing Mr. VanDyke’s accomplishments with strong evidence that supports a “Not
Qualified” rating.
Mr. VanDyke’s accomplishments are offset by the assessments of interviewees that
Mr. VanDyke is arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-today practice including procedural rules. There was a theme that the nominee lacks
humility, has an “entitlement” temperament, does not have an open mind, and does not
always have a commitment to being candid and truthful.
Some interviewees raised concerns about whether Mr. VanDyke would be fair to
persons who are gay, lesbian, or otherwise part of the LGBTQ community. Mr. VanDyke
would not say affirmatively that he would be fair to any litigant before him, notably
members of the LGBTQ community.
Even though Mr. VanDyke is clearly smart, comments were made that in some oral
arguments he missed issues fundamental to the analysis of the case. There were reports
that his preparation and performance were lacking in some cases in which he did not have
a particular personal or political interest
And he is a cry baby.
From the ABA:
Mr. VanDyke is a highly educated lawyer with nearly 14 years of experience in
appellate law, including one year as a law clerk, an associate in a law firm, and as a
Solicitor General for over five-plus years, first in Montana and then Nevada, two states
in the Ninth Circuit where he would serve if confirmed. The Committee was tasked with
balancing Mr. VanDyke’s accomplishments with strong evidence that supports a “Not
Qualified” rating.
Mr. VanDyke’s accomplishments are offset by the assessments of interviewees that
Mr. VanDyke is arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-today practice including procedural rules. There was a theme that the nominee lacks
humility, has an “entitlement” temperament, does not have an open mind, and does not
always have a commitment to being candid and truthful.
Some interviewees raised concerns about whether Mr. VanDyke would be fair to
persons who are gay, lesbian, or otherwise part of the LGBTQ community. Mr. VanDyke
would not say affirmatively that he would be fair to any litigant before him, notably
members of the LGBTQ community.
Even though Mr. VanDyke is clearly smart, comments were made that in some oral
arguments he missed issues fundamental to the analysis of the case. There were reports
that his preparation and performance were lacking in some cases in which he did not have
a particular personal or political interest
And he is a cry baby.