Equality and STEM

Yup. It's pretty ugly what goes on inside Que's pointy little head. Fortunately for him, he's usually too much of a coward to say it directly, and lets busybody say it for him. :eek:

I just think it's funny he bothered to go back and change it ... did he think I was going to report him? It would take a lot more than that for me to make that much effort ... I didn't even bother when Coach threatened to break my arm, because (a) the proposition was just so laughable and (b) it was clear evidence that he couldn't actually manifest a logical argument any more.
 
I just think it's funny he bothered to go back and change it ... did he think I was going to report him? It would take a lot more than that for me to make that much effort ... I didn't even bother when Coach threatened to break my arm, because (a) the proposition was just so laughable and (b) it was clear evidence that he couldn't actually manifest a logical argument any more.

He's got a compulsion to edit his most offensive posts. Even long, long after his interlocutors have read what he's written. It's sometimes baffling, and always hilarious.
 
Yup. It's pretty ugly what goes on inside Que's pointy little head. Fortunately for him, he's usually too much of a coward to say it directly, and lets busybody say it for him. :eek:

I just think it's funny he bothered to go back and change it ... did he think I was going to report him? It would take a lot more than that for me to make that much effort ... I didn't even bother when Coach threatened to break my arm, because (a) the proposition was just so laughable and (b) it was clear evidence that he couldn't actually manifest a logical argument any more.

being a beta bitch in a world where they don't really exist is an especially difficult reality for him to face.
 
He's got a compulsion to edit his most offensive posts. Even long, long after his interlocutors have read what he's written. It's sometimes baffling, and always hilarious.

Especially baffling when the original post has already been quoted.
 
Jordon Peterson is to the intellectual community as 50 Shades is to the BDSM community. -schism666, just now
 
Are we holding our breaths waiting for the edit?

I re- edited for your masturbatory pleasure. You're basically the pseudo-intellectual version of hashtag. You just get off on arguing

So, you're welcome
 
I re- edited for your masturbatory pleasure. You're basically the pseudo-intellectual version of hashtag. You just get off on arguing

So, you're welcome

lmao. you hang with botanyboy and you are hashtag, q. :D

ur welcum :D
 
I re- edited for your masturbatory pleasure. You're basically the pseudo-intellectual version of hashtag. You just get off on arguing

So, you're welcome

I'd personally prefer getting off on arguing to getting off on making personal attacks. At least arguing has some art to it - that's why there are debating competitions. There's no prizes for engaging in personal denigration.
(Actually, I guess you could become a famous rapper, or a WWF 'celebrity', or the President, so maybe there is something in it.)
 
Last edited:
I'd personally prefer getting off on arguing to getting off on making personal attacks. At least arguing has some art to it - that's why there are debating competitions. There's no prizes for engaging in personal denigration.
(Actually, I guess you could become a famous rapper, o a WWF 'celebrity', or the President, so maybe there is something in it.)

This is the problem with hegemonic toxic femininity. You can present ideas which are obviously personally offencive to those that you are presenting idiotic ideas to and you don't get why they should be offended at all.

Their being offended is evidence that your ideas are somehow valid.

When that script is flipped and I pointed out that although you can't find any examples whatsoever where masculinity is beneficial in modern society but I can show where simply being female could have provided you actual benefits and helped you to get to where you are... you took that as first personally offencive and went into a series of fuck offs. Hit bitches holler.

If fuck off is not a personal attack I don't know what is, you stupid ignorant bitch.
 
Last edited:
This is the problem with hegemonic toxic femininity. You can present ideas which are obviously personally offencive to those that you are presenting idiotic ideas to and you don't get why they should be offended at all.

Their being offended is evidence that your ideas are somehow valid.

When that script is flipped and I pointed out that although you can't find any examples whatsoever where masculinity is beneficial in modern society but I can show where simply being female could have provided you actual benefits and helped you to get to where you are... you took that as first personally offencive and went into a series of fuck offs. Hit bitches holler.
If fuck ois not a personal attack I don't know what is you stupid ignorant bitch.

I'm pretty careful to not personally attack people until they do so to me - at that point, I stop giving a fuck.
I've probably slipped a few times, although even then it would usually be about things they've actually said on the boards, not their ex-Lit life.
If you find the idea that men, as a group, might benefit from patriarchal structures, personally offensive, I'm sorry. I don't believe I've ever said that about you personally, and I'm fully aware that many men DON'T benefit from those structures - that belief is kind of fundamentally inbuilt into the theoretical concept of hegemonic masculinity. If you'd bothered to read anything about it, instead of deciding what it meant based on a tenuous understanding of the notion of 'hegemonic' and an assumption that 'masculinity' is singular, then you'd have some inkling of the complexity of the situation.
But clearly it easier to just typify anyone who argues from that position as a (sometimes racist) man-hater.

I can find examples ad nauseum in which being male is beneficial in modern society - I just CHOOSE not to because I've been down that path numerous times on the GB in the past, and it's clear that either people ignore the supported examples I provide, or cherry pick tiny little points to engage with and use largely anecdotal 'evidence' to respond.
I've said this numerous times. Neither you nor Bot have demonstrated any desire to actually engage in these discussions with any actual good faith.

You have no fucking idea about my life. Don't presume you do.
 
Back
Top