BabyBoomer50s
Capitalist
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2018
- Posts
- 14,175
That is my understanding as well, meaning Disney has a choice to make.My understanding is that Disney also tends to many services and infrastructure within their territory that will become the responsibility of the state.
It’s the wet dream of privatization. It looks great on paper but when the reality comes into action it has lots of unanticipated issues.
Oh the poor conflicted conservatives!
They can pay taxes to the state and two counties, deal with painfully slow and cumbersome bureaucratic permitting processes with these entities, and rely on them for basic maintenance. They can also brace themselves for more non-Disney development in the district. New hotels, big box stores, affordable housing, etc. Anaheim East.
Or they can make amends before June, 2023 and retain control over the district, (although possibly under slightly less generous terms than they had under the 1967 deal.)
DeSantis made his point. Floridians support the parental rights legislation and will not be intimidated by woke corporations that have benefited from generous incentives granted over a half century ago.
Let’s check back in 2023 and see which door Woke Disney picks. In the meantime, mortgage your house and buy Disney stock. It’s a terrifically managed corporation that is way undervalued. Lol.