ishtat
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2004
- Posts
- 5,761
and Joe Biden?
The exit from Afghanistan was a mess and doubtless military and Intelligence heads will roll in due course. Biden will have to wear the political fall out
Then the French had a hissy fit when they got called out by the Australians on a Submarine contract and lost it to the USA after some quick work by Washington.
But there has been little coverage of the fact that the USA has pulled off a significant Foreign Policy win at China's expense. First some facts: China has been giving Australia a tough time, treating Oz as a whipping boy for its problems with the USA. Emperor Xi thought he could get away with bully tactics because, unusually, Oz has a positive balance of trade with China.
Oz supplies 56% of all world trade in Iron ore, Brazil is second on 18% and much of that is owned by Oz and US interests. Oz is also the worlds largest supplier of high grade coking coal (the type you need for making steel), exporting about 190mt pa with the USA second on 50mt. Xi thought he could tell his steelmakers to source supplies from Mongolia and Russia but the quality just isn't there and they now have significant manufacturing quality problems.
The new security arrangements mean that going forward, US with OZ has a very strong grip on China's capacity to manufacture steel, ships, tanks etc through control of basic supply chains. Xi will probably flex his muscles a few more times but it seems likely that the bully tactics might bend to pragmatic requirements over the coming months.
Getting the Subs contract was icing on the cake for the USA and the French(distraction) though very 'miffed' will be back quick smart to kiss Washington's backside. It appears that Blinken, Biden and the professional negotiators in Washington did an effective job.
The exit from Afghanistan was a mess and doubtless military and Intelligence heads will roll in due course. Biden will have to wear the political fall out
Then the French had a hissy fit when they got called out by the Australians on a Submarine contract and lost it to the USA after some quick work by Washington.
But there has been little coverage of the fact that the USA has pulled off a significant Foreign Policy win at China's expense. First some facts: China has been giving Australia a tough time, treating Oz as a whipping boy for its problems with the USA. Emperor Xi thought he could get away with bully tactics because, unusually, Oz has a positive balance of trade with China.
Oz supplies 56% of all world trade in Iron ore, Brazil is second on 18% and much of that is owned by Oz and US interests. Oz is also the worlds largest supplier of high grade coking coal (the type you need for making steel), exporting about 190mt pa with the USA second on 50mt. Xi thought he could tell his steelmakers to source supplies from Mongolia and Russia but the quality just isn't there and they now have significant manufacturing quality problems.
The new security arrangements mean that going forward, US with OZ has a very strong grip on China's capacity to manufacture steel, ships, tanks etc through control of basic supply chains. Xi will probably flex his muscles a few more times but it seems likely that the bully tactics might bend to pragmatic requirements over the coming months.
Getting the Subs contract was icing on the cake for the USA and the French(distraction) though very 'miffed' will be back quick smart to kiss Washington's backside. It appears that Blinken, Biden and the professional negotiators in Washington did an effective job.
Last edited: